Scan barcode
kylieqrada's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Violence, Racism, and Sexual content
Moderate: Kidnapping, Car accident, and Death
Minor: Homophobia
danielles_reads's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.75
But she had grown complacent, had forgotten that there was always room to be afraid. All fear had to do was let doubt do the dirty work and then it could move right in, past the rubble of a person's defences.
I have mixed feelings about this one. I was really into it at the beginning, and found Joan's journey really compelling. It started to go downhill a bit when there were so many chapters from other characters' points of view instead of Joan's (I remember saying to my husband that I thought the book was about Joan but most chapters are from everyone else's POVs - and like was Heiser's POV really necessary?). But I really wanted to find out what the hell was going on with Victor, and I thought I had sort of figured it out. But then the ending was so abrupt, vague, and kind of depressing that it made everything that led up to it fizzle out in my brain and feel a bit pointless.
Spoiler ramblings:
Also like the book is advertised as being inspired by "the traditional Canadian Métis legend of the rogarou" but from what I understood of the ending, Bavarian folklore actually drove the entire story?? There were a few scenes of Joan thinking about the stories she heard growing up of the rogarou but there was never any real horror with one other than Victor's chapters, kind of. I wanted a lot more of the rogarou! I did learn stuff about the Métis that I didn't know... like I didn't know they were all "halfbreeds"!
I did really like Dimaline's prose though. It's very poetic without being purple or flowery. She had some really interesting similes and metaphors that seemed a bit weird at first but made perfect sense and led to easier visualizations. I wish I had written down some of the odder ones, but as a few examples: "The trees closed in on both sides like an evergreen cross-stitch" and "She turned to see a small bar, hanging like a comma off the end of the motel wing." The prose flowed very well and was easy to read.
I did like Joan, and her ruminations on Catholic guilt and indigenous culture were very interesting. Her relationship with Zeus was really cute, though it did seem like Zeus loved her more than she loved him. At first I was really invested in her and Victor's relationship, and seeing them reunite, but as the book went on it seemed like they only really had a sexual relationship. Like all Joan ever thought about was having sex with him. And yeah, it is understandable to miss that part of your husband, but she barely thought about anything else so we hardly learn anything about them other than they were obsessed with fucking. And like... ok lol.
There was also one moment in the book that was so obviously written by someone who didn't understand social media culture that literally took me out of the story because I had to look up how old Dimaline is lol (she's Gen X). For one, Zeus is 12 years old and apparently knows how to use Facebook better than Joan, in her 30s, does. But it was really the fact that Zeus was looking up the Facebook profile of a girl who was explicitly said to be born in 1998 (aka on the cusp of Gen Z) and posting emo photography a la 2012-era Tumblr or Instagram with location tags. Like dude. What Gen Zer is using Facebook nowadays? And on top of that, what Gen Zer is posting emo filtered photos on Facebook?? Makes no freaking sense. Anyway, it was a small moment but it was a huge driver for the plot so I can't get over it lol.
It seems a little unfair to rate this under 3 stars since I thought the book was going to be a solid 4 stars up until like the 90% mark. But the more I think about this book the more irritated I get at the ending! I'm still open to reading more of Cherie Dimaline's work, but it's not as much of a priority anymore as it was before I read this. I can't deal with abrupt and open endings, especially in standalones, and I hope this is not typical of her work.
I gotta say, though, one of the best parts of reading this was holding the floppy paperback, lol. I don't buy that many books but I did buy this one, and reading a paperback you own is a lot more satisfying than one from the library that is all laminated and stiff lol.
"Sometimes we have to do what we have to do, even if that means working in the mines. What are we supposed to do? Stay poor? Would that prove to you that we're Indian enough?"
"No, my love." Mere was serene now that she had successfully made her point. "We are supposed to stay right with community. That's how we know we're Indian enough. The companies are out to take it all, you know. We shouldn't just hand it over."
Graphic: Sexual content
Minor: Fatphobia
saint_eleanor's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
This was very beautiful to read, its about a Mètis woman whose husband goes missing a year ago and turns up as a famous christian Reverand and no memory of his wife, and she suspects the ‘rogarou’ a sk!nwalker type creature has something to do with it and she teams up w her nephew to get him back.
The ‘romance’ and the family dynamics were so realistic and lovely as well as complicated i thought it was so well written. I put romance in quotes bc its not like sappy hallmark romance but DEEP LOVE FOR HER HUSBAND who she is also pissed at and she like goes into combat mode to get him back even tho they have a complicated history and its dope.
I took a star off bc i felt the ending to be a tad predictable.
Graphic: Sexual content
anissawren's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
Graphic: Violence, Grief, Racism, Blood, Sexual content, Religious bigotry, Colonisation, and Fire/Fire injury
Moderate: Alcohol, Car accident, and Vomit
Minor: Homophobia and Infidelity
dixit's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
Graphic: Sexual content and Fire/Fire injury
Moderate: Murder, Racism, Grief, Alcohol, and Violence
maregred's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Moderate: Colonisation, Racism, Fire/Fire injury, and Religious bigotry
Minor: Sexual content
rachaelwho's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Fire/Fire injury, Abandonment, and Sexual content
Moderate: Death and Grief
Minor: Fatphobia, Abortion, and Body horror
maryfranvs's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.75
Moderate: Death, Violence, Addiction, Injury/Injury detail, Fire/Fire injury, Car accident, Murder, and Sexual content
Minor: Adult/minor relationship, Racism, Gore, and Racial slurs
raebeen's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Moderate: Sexual content
lpmooreislandtrees3's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
Moderate: Sexual content, Colonisation, and Emotional abuse