Scan barcode
julietbourke's review against another edition
adventurous
hopeful
lighthearted
mysterious
medium-paced
4.0
trueperception's review against another edition
4.0
First and foremost: This book was provided to me for free by the author, in return for an honest review.
Though not the type of book I would usually read, this was fairly good. Decent characters. The plot was a bit predictable at times (up until the end), but for a book aimed at 9-12 year old, and me being over 30, that's acceptable. I'm excited to see where the story goes from here.
Though not the type of book I would usually read, this was fairly good. Decent characters. The plot was a bit predictable at times (up until the end), but for a book aimed at 9-12 year old, and me being over 30, that's acceptable. I'm excited to see where the story goes from here.
raven_nivhaar's review against another edition
3.0
3.5
I won this book from a First Reads giveaway.
The copy I won is an uncorrected proof, so there will be no review.
I won this book from a First Reads giveaway.
The copy I won is an uncorrected proof, so there will be no review.
catladylover94's review against another edition
5.0
really good about the world heating technology, and a mans idea to hide it on a ship and even after 100 years, it stays hidden, until a war breaks out and it is waken by a young girl and her friends the rats
froggylibrarian1's review against another edition
3.0
300 years on that ship??? What about scurvy??? Too little worldbuilding and explaining...
jennametheny's review against another edition
adventurous
mysterious
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.75
abigailbat's review against another edition
3.0
Interesting world-building and a really solid steampunk fantasy adventure. Reminded me a bit of LEVIATHAN by Scott Westerfeld.
the_fabric_of_words's review against another edition
5.0
We picked up this somewhat older book at the library on a summer run.
I've loved non-fiction stories about expeditions to the Arctic (Sir Ernest Shackleton and Sir John Franklin) and Antarctic, so this book's cover caught my attention.
Visually it reminded me more than a little of the Jaws movie poster. My son read it, and said it was "pretty good." No explanation for why people turn on machines, just that they do, and life is miserable, ever after. Having once had a school assignment to make a pound cake the colonial American way, creaming the butter and sugar by hand -- it takes an hour(!!) -- my son could relate to non-electric appliance era misery.
The MC is a "Nothing Girl" who is free of the tribalism that has gripped the ship (three tribes - cooks, engineers and officers), because she belongs to no tribe. The secondary character is a boy who's been brainwashed by the anti-machinists to believe that the ship needs to be destroyed, and he's planted on the ice to be rescued and infiltrate the crew.
Visit my blog for more book reviews, free teaching materials and fiction writing tips: http://amb.mystrikingly.com/
I've loved non-fiction stories about expeditions to the Arctic (Sir Ernest Shackleton and Sir John Franklin) and Antarctic, so this book's cover caught my attention.
Visually it reminded me more than a little of the Jaws movie poster. My son read it, and said it was "pretty good." No explanation for why people turn on machines, just that they do, and life is miserable, ever after. Having once had a school assignment to make a pound cake the colonial American way, creaming the butter and sugar by hand -- it takes an hour(!!) -- my son could relate to non-electric appliance era misery.
The MC is a "Nothing Girl" who is free of the tribalism that has gripped the ship (three tribes - cooks, engineers and officers), because she belongs to no tribe. The secondary character is a boy who's been brainwashed by the anti-machinists to believe that the ship needs to be destroyed, and he's planted on the ice to be rescued and infiltrate the crew.
Visit my blog for more book reviews, free teaching materials and fiction writing tips: http://amb.mystrikingly.com/
leslie_d's review against another edition
5.0
I hugged the book before I read it, and you can be sure I hugged it afterward. Why? Because Lian Tanner has written one of my favorite Juvenile Fiction Series (The Keeper Trilogy) and she did not let me down in Icebreaker.
Tanner creates rather than contrives her characters and their conflicts. It takes reading the novel to realize what I mean by that difference between the creating and the contrivance. The characters experience real, important change, within the boundaries of their personality. You labor alongside them in those pivotal moments.
Icebreaker is not for those who like to anticipate the story and control every outcome. Tanner doesn’t make her adventures easy on the characters, why would she make it easy on the reader? Tanner’s characters earn their stunning heroism and heart. That Petrel would arrive to a transformative state is perhaps expected, but what of the others, and what of the winding series of events that traverse the massive and entangle innards of the Oyster? There are clues to mysteries (Crab) for the reader to guess successfully, but the overall the sensation of honestly not knowing what is coming next is marvelous.
Tanner complicates her otherworldly stories in painfully realistic ways. Both Petrel (aka Nothing Girl) and the strange boy she rescues have internalized the beliefs of their respective adult worlds—and they have to push back for the sake of everyone. Theirs is a violent and devastated world. The different factions are rational outcomes and hauntingly familiar, yet there is a fine and cutting edge of ridiculousness in the situation. So much of the violence is situated in willful ignorance and incredible egoism. Squid is a still, quiet breath of fresh air.
The presence of tribal leaders’ children in the story is notable; especially the handling of daughters (like Squid) as game-changers. The offspring represent the attitudes of their tribes as well as the opportunity for change. The Braids’ leader, Orca’s daughter, is a horrible fascination and was no doubt one of the most tenuous to write. How to convincingly affect change in relatively few pages, and can we trust it going forward? Nothing Girl and the “rescued boy” (who represent two sets of “others” or factions) are convincing actors, posing in alternate versions of themselves, playing the role survival requires of them. The reader is helped to understand that there is a lot at stake when it comes to who and when to trust—and how to prioritize needs and wants. From the get-go, the question of whether a Nothing Girl should have rescued the boy on the ice haunts the story: Is he worth it? Is she?
The harsh setting is fraught with the kind of danger that inspires courage and resourcefulness, though the survivalist Petrel would downplay such aggrandizement of her reality. Yet while she may not find herself exceptional or worthy of manning the story, the reader will see what her few friends do, worth the risk-taking. She is so earnest, so damned determined and requiring of love. She is so damned familiar.
How Tanner manages to make such a horrible moment near the end, the realization of Nothing Girl as Petrel, to be also humorous… She has great storytelling instincts. Tanner is thought-provoking in unexpected ways, reminding the reader always of perspective (that there is always more than one at play).
Icebreaker combines the most appealing traits of juvenile fiction: an exhilarating imagination and an increasingly necessary imperative: empathy.
I wrote this of Museum of Thieves way back when: “Tanner created a cast and setting of delectable proportions for which I found I was ravenous in Museum of Thieves and will sure to be again in City of Lies.” Go ahead and transpose Icebreaker and Sunker’s Deep; Tanner is a satiating must-read.
——-
Of note: Perfect for tracing the pathways of character development over the course of a plot, no “convenient” gaps to leap over here.
~L (omphaloskepsis)
https://contemplatrix.wordpress.com/2015/08/27/book-never-a-nothing-girl/
Tanner creates rather than contrives her characters and their conflicts. It takes reading the novel to realize what I mean by that difference between the creating and the contrivance. The characters experience real, important change, within the boundaries of their personality. You labor alongside them in those pivotal moments.
Icebreaker is not for those who like to anticipate the story and control every outcome. Tanner doesn’t make her adventures easy on the characters, why would she make it easy on the reader? Tanner’s characters earn their stunning heroism and heart. That Petrel would arrive to a transformative state is perhaps expected, but what of the others, and what of the winding series of events that traverse the massive and entangle innards of the Oyster? There are clues to mysteries (Crab) for the reader to guess successfully, but the overall the sensation of honestly not knowing what is coming next is marvelous.
Tanner complicates her otherworldly stories in painfully realistic ways. Both Petrel (aka Nothing Girl) and the strange boy she rescues have internalized the beliefs of their respective adult worlds—and they have to push back for the sake of everyone. Theirs is a violent and devastated world. The different factions are rational outcomes and hauntingly familiar, yet there is a fine and cutting edge of ridiculousness in the situation. So much of the violence is situated in willful ignorance and incredible egoism. Squid is a still, quiet breath of fresh air.
The presence of tribal leaders’ children in the story is notable; especially the handling of daughters (like Squid) as game-changers. The offspring represent the attitudes of their tribes as well as the opportunity for change. The Braids’ leader, Orca’s daughter, is a horrible fascination and was no doubt one of the most tenuous to write. How to convincingly affect change in relatively few pages, and can we trust it going forward? Nothing Girl and the “rescued boy” (who represent two sets of “others” or factions) are convincing actors, posing in alternate versions of themselves, playing the role survival requires of them. The reader is helped to understand that there is a lot at stake when it comes to who and when to trust—and how to prioritize needs and wants. From the get-go, the question of whether a Nothing Girl should have rescued the boy on the ice haunts the story: Is he worth it? Is she?
The harsh setting is fraught with the kind of danger that inspires courage and resourcefulness, though the survivalist Petrel would downplay such aggrandizement of her reality. Yet while she may not find herself exceptional or worthy of manning the story, the reader will see what her few friends do, worth the risk-taking. She is so earnest, so damned determined and requiring of love. She is so damned familiar.
How Tanner manages to make such a horrible moment near the end, the realization of Nothing Girl as Petrel, to be also humorous… She has great storytelling instincts. Tanner is thought-provoking in unexpected ways, reminding the reader always of perspective (that there is always more than one at play).
Icebreaker combines the most appealing traits of juvenile fiction: an exhilarating imagination and an increasingly necessary imperative: empathy.
I wrote this of Museum of Thieves way back when: “Tanner created a cast and setting of delectable proportions for which I found I was ravenous in Museum of Thieves and will sure to be again in City of Lies.” Go ahead and transpose Icebreaker and Sunker’s Deep; Tanner is a satiating must-read.
——-
Of note: Perfect for tracing the pathways of character development over the course of a plot, no “convenient” gaps to leap over here.
~L (omphaloskepsis)
https://contemplatrix.wordpress.com/2015/08/27/book-never-a-nothing-girl/
michaelferlazzo's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
funny
lighthearted
mysterious
sad
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.5