reflective tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

This was a really oppressive book, particularly in the final chapters. A book where our main character, Winston Smith, is offered a twinge of hope before being completely beaten into the ground. The final chapter really depressed me. Seeing Winston’s fire being completely extinguished left me with a feeling of hopelessness. Even his plan to get the better of the Party in the split second between hearing the shot fired and the bullet entering his brain was thwarted with the final feeling of adoration of Big Brother stole him of any autonomy. A sad man who I rooted for — I even felt like I was the one being punished for believing in him reading the final pages as if it were some cruel operation by the Thought Police.

This book has very outward flaws, the biggest one being Goldstein’s Brotherhood bible just being shoved into the final chapter of Part 2. It felt lazy and would have been far more impactful if it had been edited down rather than constantly repeating the same phrase over and over with different words. It’s completely hamfisted and exhaustive on the reader, and brings the narrative to a complete halt. The characters were also very one-dimensional. Parson, who Winston perceives as a bumbling fool, is probably the most interesting of all the side characters to me. He gets outed by his own daughter, which the evidence for itself seems dubious enough as there is no definite proof that his treachery even happened, and yet he sits beside Winston in the gaol cell beaming with pride. But Orwell tries to paint him as unlikeable by describing him as fat, sweaty, and stupid — which I go more into further on.

The depictions of the characters in general are very of its time. Julia is written to represent moreso the “idea” of women rather than an actual woman. She is far younger and “sexier” than Winston and, despite her sexuality, she settles on him for no real reason given. In the final chapter he almost rejects the possibility of trying to meet with her again, not just because of their equal betrayal of each other, but rather because she is no longer the sweet thing he used to gawk at. He no longer desires her despite having gone through the same physically altering trauma she had gone through. This depiction of Winston’s love interest seems to be more indicative of Orwell’s own views, which loops back to the period in which the novel was written. Even the depiction of the proles was largely influenced by Orwell’s own disgust of the lower class, describing in detail how unattractive the prole women were to Winston with how “wide” they were from pumping out children. To describe the less fortunate as ugly, dirty, stupid, and reduced to just “breeding,” Orwell gives in to the stereotypes that are propped up by the higher class of the real world. There are also insensitive descriptions of non-white people, particularly bad with the seldom Asian characters that are only mentioned in the few paragraphs they are included in.

My only regrets with this book are that I wish I had read this sooner. At my age now, I have become jaded and cynical towards the world. I was apathetic that the characters feared they were being watched and analysed, and that the Party had got away with their tyranny. I was half-expecting Big Brother to have been a machine algorithm all along, with how perfectly planned the Party was in capturing traitors by planting rebellious material as if it were rat poison. In my mind, no political organisation comprised of humans will ever be able to carry out what the Party had while also being able to hold on to their power. Maybe if I had read this when I was younger it would have impacted me more, let alone before the age of surveillance and censorship we are currently in. Either way, I’m still thankful that I finally got around to reading this classic.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
challenging dark emotional mysterious sad tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
challenging dark slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
challenging dark emotional hopeful inspiring mysterious reflective sad tense fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
dark

Well, I had never read this in high school and after years of hearing 1984 frequently referenced, this is the first book I read to kick off my reading era! 

My first comment regards the main character of this book, Winston. He represents the type of man raised by a militant, totalitarian government and as such he's by no means meant to be a good or likable character. We, the reader, see how this world has fostered hatred towards woman - something we see contemporarily with the rise of misogynistic influencers targeting young men. While important to include, Winston's misogynistic and violent views toward women make certain passages a little difficult to read.

Secondly, beyond Winston’s perspective of women, Orwell’s views towards women are evident in his characterization of female characters. Julia lacks depth, is primarily defined by her sexuality, and remains uninterested in (even struggling to grasp) the intellectual and political concepts Winston discusses with her. Early on in the novel she boldly confesses her feelings for Winston, and when asked why she pursued him, we are told that she is particularly astute, and was able to tell that he stood against Big Brother. Her boldness and astuteness seem to be completely as the story progresses, and she allows Winston to entirely speak for her towards the end of the novel. Moreover, every revolutionary figure referenced in the book is male, which both reinforces a narrow perspective on resistance and is dismissive of the key role women have played historically in revolution and times of political turmoil. Despite this 1984 is a book that should continue to be read, and I'm glad I have finally gotten around to doing so.

Bonus: I did not realize until after purchasing the audiobook that the narrator is the voice actor of Wyll in Baldur’s Gate 3! His narration about a minor character, Comrade Withers, had to be the highlight of the 12 hour listen.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
juan_adhd_reading's profile picture

juan_adhd_reading's review against another edition

DID NOT FINISH: 39%

Presté este libro y desafortunadamente no tuve el tiempo suficiente para terminarlo antes de devolverlo.

Me intriga mucho la trama, por lo que espero reponer mi lectura pero con una edición en su idioma original.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: N/A
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

This book is a  misogynistic piece of shi-

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
challenging dark emotional reflective sad tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
challenging dark mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

briejoy's review against another edition

DID NOT FINISH: 7%

Violently misogynistic 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings