Scan barcode
grubstlodger's review against another edition
2.0
Strange book this. It says that it has a central idea, that children’s authors are closer to children but doesn’t really have much to argue for that. To make up for the lack of solid argumentation for it’s case it throws tons of quotes and citations for what are essentially opinions, as if having an endnote to an opinion makes it correct. I am of the the opinion that when you write opinions you should show yourself opinionated, not hide it as fact. In such it seemed to me to be a very American piece of ‘scholarship’ that carries on the 17/18th Century idea that all valid opinions are stated in previous texts. There was also such an American bias that sometimes it was hard to read.
just_fighting_censorship's review against another edition
2.0
1 1/2 Stars
Overall, this was a disappointment. These have to be the least scholarly literary essays that I've ever read (also the least interesting). These felt like research papers written by a high school freshman.
For the most part they were pretty direction-less providing surface level biographies of authors and a brief summary of their notable works. The literary criticisms were an inconsistent mix of shallow interpretations and opinions passed on as facts.
There really isn't anything in this book that you can't find on Wikipedia and the writing style is about the same.
There was a tie for most horrendous between Lurie's essay on Dr. Seuss and JK Rowling. I can excuse some of the faults within the Rowling/Harry Potter essay because this was written in 2003, a time when Harry Potter was a bit more "scandalous" and most of the articles written about it mentioned fundamentalist Christians. However, I was expecting literary criticism, not a fluff article for Time Magazine.
Her article on Dr. Seuss is a sad representation of the author. Her observations often state the obvious except for when she is shamefully reaching. The elephants in "Oh the Places you Will Go" represent Republicans because they are elephants.... Really? Internet Creepypastas have more supporting evidence!
Overall, I just found these essays to be of the basest quality. They weren't interesting or well crafted. To make matters worse I didn't feel that the author cared. There didn't seem to be a whole lot of passion for the subject matter. Often I finished an essay and thought, what's your point?! Apparently each essay was meant to illustrate that children's authors "prefer the world of young people to the world of adults". First off, no. You did not properly illustrate this 'theory'. Second, does this even qualify as a theory? I'm going to write a book about how chefs love cooking and painters love art.
My suggestion is that you skip this one.
Overall, this was a disappointment. These have to be the least scholarly literary essays that I've ever read (also the least interesting). These felt like research papers written by a high school freshman.
For the most part they were pretty direction-less providing surface level biographies of authors and a brief summary of their notable works. The literary criticisms were an inconsistent mix of shallow interpretations and opinions passed on as facts.
There really isn't anything in this book that you can't find on Wikipedia and the writing style is about the same.
There was a tie for most horrendous between Lurie's essay on Dr. Seuss and JK Rowling. I can excuse some of the faults within the Rowling/Harry Potter essay because this was written in 2003, a time when Harry Potter was a bit more "scandalous" and most of the articles written about it mentioned fundamentalist Christians. However, I was expecting literary criticism, not a fluff article for Time Magazine.
Her article on Dr. Seuss is a sad representation of the author. Her observations often state the obvious except for when she is shamefully reaching. The elephants in "Oh the Places you Will Go" represent Republicans because they are elephants.... Really? Internet Creepypastas have more supporting evidence!
Overall, I just found these essays to be of the basest quality. They weren't interesting or well crafted. To make matters worse I didn't feel that the author cared. There didn't seem to be a whole lot of passion for the subject matter. Often I finished an essay and thought, what's your point?! Apparently each essay was meant to illustrate that children's authors "prefer the world of young people to the world of adults". First off, no. You did not properly illustrate this 'theory'. Second, does this even qualify as a theory? I'm going to write a book about how chefs love cooking and painters love art.
My suggestion is that you skip this one.
geriatricgretch's review
4.0
Informative essays that all have a nicely unexpected twist with an idea that I wouldn't have put in with that book or author.
More...