inkwellimps's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated

2.75


I wouldn't recommend it to people who are fans of the original book. As a derivative work, I wasn't expecting to be so far astray from the original--Victor in particular I was very bothered by. To give one example early on in the novel,
there is a scene where Victor as a child comes to his senses after having hurt his younger brother and is wholly unconcerned that his brother is bleeding out
, which makes me wonder if Kiersten White and I read the same Frankenstein where Victor is filled with anxiety and dread over the thought of anything happening to his loved ones, where securing his family’s safety is his sole motivation after the creature’s creation. Like EVEN if we go with the "Victor is mad" theory, it is Victor's emotional investment in the wellbeing of his family that drives the tension and interest in Frankenstein. Additionally, in the original every death puts Victor in a deep despair where he stops engaging with the world and caring for himself until others intervene. In The Dark Descent, this is reduced to Victor being very sickly, and is entirely unrelated outside of giving Elizabeth a way to conveniently discover Victor's research.

I do genuinely believe there's a lot that could be said about Elizabeth, or anyone in her position, as someone taken in as a parentified only daughter (as Victor's parents seem to treat her in the original), but I don't think this book is the book to do it. I was eagerly anticipating how White would handle (spoilers for the original book)
Justine being accused of young William's murder and Elizabeth genuinely blaming her. In the original, this is a moment of real heartbreak for Elizabeth where she not only loses the child but believes momentarily her close friend is guilty of murder before Victor convinces her of Justine's innocence.
I was genuinely disappointed that the Elizabeth of The Dark Descent could not be--even momentarily--flawed and this Elizabeth for no moment doubted Justine's innocence, making the scene overall more boring.

For being billed as “The Dark Descent of Elizabeth Frankenstein”, the majority of the novel portrays Elizabeth as a victim. The darkness in question is mainly Elizabeth trying to make herself appealing to Victor and ||convincing herself she is responsible for Victor’s murders via not knowing he was committing them||. She is rather hastily comforted by a side character, Mary,  that she is not at fault. Shortly before this, Mary straight up tells Elizabeth that she is a victim.
After taking charge, Elizabeth leads a more righteous life
—as much as the author’s note solidifies that this was written with the intent of being a feminist novel, it bothers me that all of the female protagonist’s choices cannot be caused by her own volition, but must instead be caused by the villainous male character. It’s just another caricature of femininity.

I did try to give this novel a chance as its own isolated narrative after getting over that initial surprise, but beyond what it borrows from Shelley, I found it to be mediocre. There was a small moment I was genuinely invested around the 3/4 mark where it is revealed that
Elizabeth still could inherent the Lavenza fortune and that this potential is the reason Judge Frankenstein kept her around,
but a couple scenes after that I found myself disengaged. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ahoyitsjoy's review

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Excellent "women's rights and women's wrongs" book. I loved White's version of Elizabeth. She was such an interesting and sympathetic character, compared to her existence as a stereotype in the original.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kianacynthia's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional mysterious reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

4m0r's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

I know this book is brilliant. But somehow I always forget how good it actually is. Elizabeth is the perfect protagonist, you know she's privilege by he looks, but that hasn't gotten her anywhere, it's here brain. How she adapts to survive, the lengths she goes to protect herself and the ones she loves. When everything breaks apart it's like that Elizabeth does no longer exist and we start getting glimpses of what is going to be the new Elizabeth, it's wonderful. K.White really is a genius for being able to write this mesmerizing book

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jomarie's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.5

This book did not deliver on the promises of the back cover blurb. I wanted to see what growing up was like for Elizabeth, wanted the tension that came with Victor being sent away for school and coming back amid tragedy that he helped cause. The flashbacks were as close as we got, but they came in only when Elizabeth was reminiscing on a specific memory. 

While Elizabeth was positioned as being a master manipulator, it had a desperate edge to it that didn’t strike the right cord for me. In the beginning, I couldn’t tell if Elizabeth truly wanted to be with Victor or if she just was compelled due to her station - and I don’t think I was supposed to question that. Victor retained his dramatic pick-me tendencies from the original story, but with a more sinister, psychotic edge which was the best combination of original text and innovation by White in the whole novel. 

In fact, the one plus this reimagining has over the original text is that it had much more of the gothic, creepy vibes I expected from a story about reanimating the dead. Although, if I hadn’t read Frankenstein right before, then I’m not sure I would have enjoyed this book since everyone’s travel across Europe would have seemed overly random. 

The final nail in the coffin for me was the ending. There was promise when the author changed Elizabeth’s end from the original text, even if I didn’t love the implication that Victor wrote a fictitious version of events that became The Modern Prometheus (put some respect on Mary Shelley’s name). Still, it was a chance for the author to get creative. Elizabeth’s final confrontation, however, felt a bit rushed and out of the blue, and then the literal last page went back on her characterization for the back half of the book. My opinion of the book plummeted from ‘fine’ to ‘annoying’. 

The Dark Descent of Elizabeth Frankenstein is just one of those stories where the premise is better than the actual plot. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

murielreads's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark mysterious reflective tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

La trama? Fabulosa. La ambientación? Sublime. La narración? Impecable. Los personajes? Exquisitos. Mí amor por Kiersten White? Infinito. 


At this point simplemente denme la lista de compras del súper de Kiersten que yo la leo a encantada

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

apestforwrens's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

If you want “girlboss Frankenstein” this isn’t the book you want. If you want “Rebecca and Frankenstein had a weird kid” this is that book. It’s a really interesting take on the original that pays homage to both the story and Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley. Slow burn for a fascinating character journey

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

white_dragon_tea's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark funny hopeful reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

booksofautumn's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

nicoleleann1997's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings