Reviews

Saints by Gene Luen Yang

skiwi's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

pcarney's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Easier to read after reading Boxers. I think I liked this story better

gellyreads's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

joana_stormblessed's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

great book and it really added to the story. this was really good

roseleaf24's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I'm glad that most of the lists and review outlets consider Boxers and Saints together, because they really are a unit. I don't think this was quite as balanced a view of Christianity as it could have been. It was an amazing presentation of one life in a very complicated war, and what brought her to be on the "side" she was on. I love the way the stories combine, and how simply the format allows the idea that concepts such as right and wrong and winnersin war are not so simple at all.

ponch22's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

It feels only right to review [b:Boxers|17210470|Boxers (Boxers & Saints, #1)|Gene Luen Yang|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1359199413l/17210470._SX50_.jpg|23691809] and [b:Saints|17210471|Saints (Boxers & Saints, #2)|Gene Luen Yang|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1359199657l/17210471._SX50_.jpg|23691810] together since they're companion pieces, each telling a similar story from two different points of view.

[a:Gene Luen Yang|68959|Gene Luen Yang|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1415919636p2/68959.jpg] tells a fictionalized version of the Boxer Rebellion from the POV of Little Bao, a young man who ends up becoming a leader of the Boxers, and from the POV of Four-Girl, a young girl from Bao's village who becomes a Christian after being visited by the spirit of Joan of Arc (not yet Saint-ed).

I read the larger Boxers first & loved Yang's illustrations and [a:Lark Pien|2679817|Lark Pien|https://s.gr-assets.com/assets/nophoto/user/u_50x66-632230dc9882b4352d753eedf9396530.png]'s colors. The slimmer Saints has a much more muted color palette (I suppose to make the ghostly Joan glow all the more?) but goes well as the second book read. (I feel like a reading of Saints before Boxers would have been wrong, especially since the epilogue of Saints negates the powerful ending of Boxers)

While I've heard of the Boxer Rebellion before, I never knew much about what it was (or even who fought in it). These two stories do a good job setting up the pros & cons for both sides—neither group is presented as fully good nor fully evil. It was interesting seeing the handful of scenes that are in both volumes. Boxers definitely feels like the stronger book (given its length, more details, and stronger ending); as I said previously, the Epilogue in Saints felt lazy when looking back at the first book's ending (although I did enjoy the quick callback to the prayer Four-Girl seemingly teaches without any text).

historybowler's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Closer to 3.5 stars. I think this is the weakest of the duology because it seems like the story isn't as well developed as Boxers. It is still good though!

hannahmcclee's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional informative mysterious sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

megadeathvsbooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Boxers was, overall, better. But this did a nice job of filling in the blanks.