Reviews

Genius Squad by Catherine Jinks

catethegreat03's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I really enjoyed this book. Cadel and Sonja return in the sequel as well as several, in my option, lovable characters. The twist and turns kept me reading (though there was one twist that more frustrated me than anything else. I'll let you read it and come to your own conclusions) and it was an exciting read. If you liked the first book, you'll enjoy the second and I look forward to reading the next book.
(Important note: I don't think you can enjoy this book if you don't read the first one, so please read Evil Genius first).

readwithpassion's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

While it took me a long time to read this one, I definitely did enjoy it. It didn't feel extremely creative or unique, but it is full of suspense that would grab a lot of readers. The best way I can describe it is: Artemis Fowl (genius kid; action plot) meets City of Ashes (evil father; suspense) meets Little Brother (computer whiz). I didn't read the first one, but I didn't feel terribly left out. The author describes most of the background information, but leaves enough open for the reader to want to go back to the first. I am not left pondering themes of human nature, but it was an action-packed tale that many kids would enjoy.

sfergie's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Not quite as good as Evil Genius, but still a decent book in its own right.

Before I started reading this, I read a few of the other reviews, which said that it was boring except for the last quarter of the book. Whilst the last quarter is admittedly far more exciting, the rest of the book is really interesting and still entertaining.

I loved it almost as much as I loved the first one.

melfurious's review

Go to review page

4.0

A great second part to this series. The characters from the last book weren't hard to follow on this one, and the introduction of new characters was spaced out enough that I didn't get lost like I did in Evil Genius. Looking forward to the next one!

jedabooks's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

marykirk's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

It was different from the first book because Cadel's identity is floating on the edge (he's lost and denied everything he's known and he's trying to figure out the boundary lines). It also went much slower than the first book (it took me a time to finish it.) but the ending when the villain returned? Omigosh. Things got infinitely quicker and so much more compelling. Read to the end. It's worth it.

roshk99's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

A bit too convoluted and technical, Cadel is too much of a martyr

kjtoo's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Not quite as strong as its predecessor, [b:Evil Genius|295741|Evil Genius|Catherine Jinks|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1173479293s/295741.jpg|2996049], but still a worthy read.

adeperi's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Just as good as the first, if not better!

elissagator's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I didn't realize this was a sequel. Publishers need to do a better job of printing somewhere on the cover #2. Besides that, I was able to follow the story line fairly closely and I didn't feel completely lost. Cadel is a foster kid being in a witness protection like program after he was part of a school to train youngsters to become evil geniuses and take over the world, his father being Evil Genius No. 1. From what I surmised, that's what the first book was about. This second book, I felt like it moved pretty slow. It wasn't until the end that things started picking up.

I liked the concept of the book, I always like when kids outsmart adults. I may or may not read the first and third.