Reviews tagging 'Injury/Injury detail'

Dio di Illusioni by Donna Tartt

232 reviews

place6o_ffct's review against another edition

Go to review page

Plot got too thin. Eventually it felt like just futzing around following the characters—and without the sense of progression from the plot, I got bored. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

brot's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

norabeideineroma's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional informative inspiring mysterious reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

amberg25's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious reflective tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ilsabelle's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious reflective tense
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

joslyn_cole's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark slow-paced

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

clairebear23's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

Well.

Did I finish the book in two days? Sure did. I wish I would have gone to bed instead.

I have a lot of problems with this book. It was entertaining, I can certainly admit that. But I wasn't drawn into the story by any measure of concern for the characters. I just wanted to know what the mystery was and how everything turned out. For all his aloofness and intellectual elitism, Henry did manage to get me hooked on finding out his secrets.

I agree with many others that the characterization fell flat. Like used-powdered-sugar-instead-of-flour-while-baking-cupcakes flat. When every character has a selfish motivation, it's boring. There's nothing unique about a person acting in their own self-interest and -preservation. No one was able to actually face their emotions about anything -- the beginning was fine before the drugs and alcohol induced hazes of the next 75% surfaced. For a book about intense emotion and living in the moment, everyone seemed intent on being miserable and trying to stoically ignore their inner turmoil that definitely most certainly most obviously were there (/s).

I really had a problem with the way Francis was portrayed. I think Tartt relied heavily on the "predatory gay" stereotype that tends to pop up in "gritty" stories / anything created earlier than 2014. Francis doesn't respect boundaries, comes on to every male in his life, and only seems to have sexual rather romantic or platonic interests. When Richard reflects on the moment they had in the canoe where their hands brushed, he made it seem like it was an inevitable thing that Francis would hit on him. It wasn't inevitable, Tartt just chose to play along with the oft-touted epithet of closeted bigots: "well I'm a man, and you're gay, so therefore you must be attracted to me" and "what if he hits on me? Because he's obviously interested in me because I'm a man." Didn't like and it put a sour taste in my mouth.

It honestly didn't feel like there were any stakes. I was never worried at any point for them. Again, I simply was curious and wanted to find out what the hell was happening. Even when Julian found the letter at the end, I knew nothing was going to happen. Julian was barely in the whole book, so why now should he play an important role?

What the hell was up with the Camilla and Charles incest plot. Awful. Ridiculous. Charles did not get enough shit for that
.

The whole story was overly pedantic and pretentious. I kept waiting for them to all turn on Henry and realize how miserable they were living their life in isolation and with their nose stuck in the past.
It almost got there, and then Henry shot himself (which, was a weird scene in itself)
. Just set me on edge. I love me some Shakespeare and I can and will talk your ear off about his plays, but this was just too much. Personally a matter of taste, I think, in this regard.

Generally, I'm not a big fan of "dark academia" because I find them to be overly pretentious. So I admit I had a bias coming into this book, but I feel justified in not liking it as a whole because of the flat characters, loose ends to major plots (ie Charles and Camilla), Francis, and just the vibe. Thanks for reading.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

stxrlightreaderxx's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

theeo's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious reflective tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

I mostly enjoyed this! I found the plot to be a thrilling slow burn, and disliking the majority of the characters was strangely fun. The writing style is also really wonderful. The characters sometimes sound overly-formal, which at first is a little jarring, but it works because it adds to the weirdly entertaining unpleasantness of their personalities.

I disliked that some descriptions and details felt unnecessary - the author sometimes goes on tangents that don’t offer much substance or relevance to the plot, and almost feel like filler to an already rich story. This is more of a person gripe, but I also didn’t love how long the chapters were. I don’t like to stop mid-chapter (especially when I’m enjoying it) so I ended up sleeping too late on several occasions while reading this…

I did really enjoy this book overall! I may even reread one day, as it’s quite dense and I read it reasonably fast.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mskingbean69's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional informative mysterious sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings