1.63k reviews for:

A Botanical Daughter

Noah Medlock

3.67 AVERAGE

adventurous dark funny mysterious tense fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: No

Hmm. I'll start with the good, which is that this book made me laugh out loud several times. The scene of Simon trying to get over the Finches' gate really got me. I also enjoy how the language used shifts with each character's perspective. Simon's sections are awkward, Chloe's are verdant and teeming with life and rhythm. I also liked when it got real nasty.

That said, overall this was a bit disappointing to me. It was very oddly paced, with any climax (of which I'd say there are arguably two) fizzling out almost immediately. There were no consequences or repercussions faced by the protagonists, which in a book compared to Shelley is... a bit astounding. Nothing ever came of the tension produced by Jenny not knowing of Chloe's true origins. Simon and Gregor (Boo!!! Gregor sucks btw!) just get to live happily ever after or whatever. There is zero character development or journey happening here, which is so frustrating because there was so much that could've been done with Simon and Gregor acting as foils to each other.

There's a lot of potential here, and I'd be willing to get into more of this author's work just because I was really impressed by this quirky, silly, but violent and gothic setting. But overall I found it quite shallow and extremely unsatisfying.

P.S. I have absolutely zero qualms about monster fucking. I understand the monster fucking itself and the ensuing consequences were the biggest ode to Shelley this book deigned to bother with. But I still hated it and think it was the point where the book really took a nose dive for me.
dark tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Between the beautiful cover and the mix of queer romance and horror, I was so excited for this read. Unfortunately it didn’t deliver the way I hoped. Too much technical plant speak took me out of it and i really wanted more of the relationship between the 2 main characters and more horror elements. The shocking event at the end really supports my opinion that men shouldn’t write female characters. Mostly disappointed because i saw lots of potential. Full review is up on the podcast - Fully Booked and Caffeinated 

grimripley's review

5.0

I truly adored this book: the plot, the characters, the detailed descriptions, the mechanics of Choe, the chemistry between characters, and of course how unhinged some of them were. Not every character was loveable, of course; some of them were easy to hate, but that is how they were written to be. What I especially loved was Chloe, she was written to be equally horrifying, adorable, and curious about the world around her. Jennifer's character was a wonderful example of non-conformity, especially when it came to her thoughts, sexuality, and preference to wear men's clothing. I think Simon had the best character development; at first, he was a bit shy and nearly anti-social, preferring his taxidermy and oddities over social interactions. It was quite fun watching Gregor spiral and lose his humanity. He was a complete hypocrite and manipulative, making him a great antihero, but leans towards villain in the end. The only thing I didn't like was the ending for Chloe and Jennifer, but not every book has a happy ending for everyone. It was a happy ending for Gregor and Simon, but I wanted to see Chloe and Jennifer have a happy ending together. The ending I wanted is not something I would take away a star for, the ending was still good.
dark emotional reflective medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
informative medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
readgina_la_987's profile picture

readgina_la_987's review

2.0

I listened to the audiobook and a lot of things annoyed me, especially Gregor’s voice.
I did like the press though.
challenging dark emotional reflective medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

First off, I love Frankenstein. I think about MWS and her life on a regular basis, and you can tell the author of this novel does to. I don't think this novel would be as enjoyable if it was removed from its connections and commentary on Frankenstein. Similar reflections or personhood, familial ties, and death abound. 

I kept waiting for this to feel more like horror, and it never quite did. In the end, I think that was the right move. I keep thinking about the last scene where
Chloe rings her bells for everyone that has contributed to her sense of self and family.
This stuck with me much more than I think a true plant murder story would have. I found myself rooting for creating queer joy and building a separate paradise while also struggling with removal from the "common homosexual" and the clearly problematic relationship at the center of the story. This is not an easy book to sum up or even describe how I feel about it. And that makes me enjoy it even more. 
dark reflective medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
challenging dark hopeful mysterious sad tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes