Scan barcode
trulydevious's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
Graphic: Blood, Violence, Grief, Forced institutionalization, and Death
Moderate: Stalking, Racism, Murder, Mental illness, Death of parent, and Body horror
Minor: Alcohol
_ciaranmoss's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.5
Graphic: Death and Forced institutionalization
Moderate: Sexism, Death of parent, and Stalking
Minor: Sexual assault and Xenophobia
brnineworms's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Overall I did enjoy Dracula and I’m glad I finally sat down and read it. It’s certainly not without its flaws but I think it’s worth reading if you haven’t already.
“The last I saw of Count Dracula was his kissing his hand to me, with a red light of triumph in his eyes, and with a smile that Judas in hell might be proud of.”
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Antisemitism, Blood, Confinement, Death, Forced institutionalization, Gore, Medical content, Mental illness, Misogyny, Murder, Racism, Sexism, and Violence
Moderate: Ableism, Alcohol, Animal death, Child death, Death of parent, Drug use, Grief, Kidnapping, Racial slurs, Stalking, Suicidal thoughts, and Xenophobia
Minor: Body horror, Self harm, Slavery, Suicide, and Vomit
pastry's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
Moderate: Blood, Cultural appropriation, Death, Forced institutionalization, and Violence
bambidew's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
Graphic: Child death, Death, Forced institutionalization, Racism, and Kidnapping
Moderate: Blood and Death of parent
wordswoods's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Graphic: Blood
Moderate: Animal death, Body horror, Child death, Death, Forced institutionalization, Grief, Mental illness, Murder, Physical abuse, Suicidal thoughts, and Violence
lezzieborden's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Graphic: Confinement and Forced institutionalization
Moderate: Blood and Death
Minor: Gun violence, Xenophobia, Suicidal thoughts, and Sexual violence
catearedwriter's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Moderate: Animal death, Blood, Confinement, Death, Forced institutionalization, Grief, Medical content, Sexism, Stalking, and Toxic relationship
knightbirds's review against another edition
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.75
Moderate: Blood, Death, Grief, Medical content, Mental illness, Racial slurs, and Sexism
Minor: Animal death, Antisemitism, Child abuse, Child death, Forced institutionalization, Gun violence, Racism, Sexual assault, Suicidal thoughts, Violence, and Terminal illness
-Moderate Racial slurs: the word "g*psy" is used multiple times throughout the novel -Moderate Sexism: There is no sexism encountered by the characters in the universe of the story, but the narration and word choices of the author are dated and express antiquated opinions on gender roles and gendered expectations throughout the novelaccidentalspaceexplorer's review against another edition
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.25
I was really pleasantly surprised by it, honestly - it's much more gripping than I was expecting it to be, and the tropes have not been so well copied that I knew every step of the plot. There were definitely parts that I could really clearly see sign-posted because of Dracula's lasting impact on the genre, but I wasn't expecting the section in England to last as long as it did or be as interesting as it was. And honestly, a lot of the early portion of the novel was pretty hilarious, with modern eyes - the time that Dracula chucks the mirror out the window, the awkwardness of all the men proposing to Lucy on the same day, them subsequently lining up to give Lucy blood transfusions - which really helped me get into the novel. But I do think that Dracula shines best when it is building tension and suspense - all of the long conversations between people about what to do next, and the drawn-out unnerving nights where you don't know whether someone will live or die, and the slow ramp-up where you know Dracula is around but the main characters don't.
As soon as it switches to action, it loses a lot of its grip, because the complicated run-on sentences and padding of the events being related that worked so well to create tension makes it difficult to follow the action sequences. The ending was just a blur of "I guess they're fighting now" that left me pretty confused, and I definitely skipped a lot in the last fifty or so pages because I was tired of the endless talking when the time for action was here.
Other things that bothered me - the casual sexism of talking about Mina as though she has a "man's brain" just because she's smart, the casual disregard for rural people and their traditions as backwards and quaint, some of the asylum stuff, the depiction of criminals as people with "child-brains" which was really weird, and the random scene right at the end where Mina exults about how great money is.
Despite its flaws, however, I think that this classic holds up pretty well, although it is much better in the beginning and middle than it is at the end.
Minor: Misogyny and Forced institutionalization