Take a photo of a barcode or cover
4.16 AVERAGE
4.16 AVERAGE
5 stars.
Its a big "fuck you" to all those who tried to erase Sappho's literary merits as an exposure to her sexuality only to have it survive, though partially, in twenty first century; to have her works reach every part of the world and not just the geography she was tied to. It only goes to show how even amidst sexism and bigotry, her works were admired and artists, poets and literary agents have taken it upon themselves to preserve and treasure what remained and what they could collect at that time.
Aristophane portrayed her as a clown on stage, Horace and Ovid though admired her works didn't attribute much to the passion she showed other women in her works, apologists called the homoerotic text as "oh, its just metaphor", and twentieth century poets like Auden publicly dismissed homo-eroticism in her poetry while in private admitted to it.
My favorite:
Anger
When anger is flooding
through your chest
best to quiet your reckless
barking tongue
---------------------------
Famous critique:
Some say there are nine Muses.
Count again.
Behold the tenth:
Sappho of Lesbos.
Plato, in The Greek Anthology 9.506
Yeah.
Its a big "fuck you" to all those who tried to erase Sappho's literary merits as an exposure to her sexuality only to have it survive, though partially, in twenty first century; to have her works reach every part of the world and not just the geography she was tied to. It only goes to show how even amidst sexism and bigotry, her works were admired and artists, poets and literary agents have taken it upon themselves to preserve and treasure what remained and what they could collect at that time.
Aristophane portrayed her as a clown on stage, Horace and Ovid though admired her works didn't attribute much to the passion she showed other women in her works, apologists called the homoerotic text as "oh, its just metaphor", and twentieth century poets like Auden publicly dismissed homo-eroticism in her poetry while in private admitted to it.
My favorite:
Anger
When anger is flooding
through your chest
best to quiet your reckless
barking tongue
---------------------------
Famous critique:
Some say there are nine Muses.
Count again.
Behold the tenth:
Sappho of Lesbos.
Plato, in The Greek Anthology 9.506
Yeah.
So this is my first time reading Sappho, and I absolutely loved it.
As a queer person, I really wanted to read her because I wanted to feel her voice and I always want queer women to be represented in work. For me, this book was really special because of how ancient it is, which proves to me that queer people have been around since forever, and always will be.
... unfortunately, though, Sappho's work is fragmentary. Fragmentary because she was a woman, and she loved other women. Many of her poems were burned of destroyed, despite the fact that she was one of Greece's first and most prolific lyrical poets. (She wrote nine books!) If I think about it for too long, I get angry. And then I get angry that years later, after finally acknowledging her importance, academics (most of them white, male and heterosexual) vehemently denied her sexuality at every turn.
If I could say one thing to her, I would apologise, both for how she was treated, and how her work was treated.
MOVING ON, away from my bitter rant. This translation felt a little bit formal for me, so I'd like to read some others and explore more of Sappho's work and how differently her poems can be recommended. I absolutely loved her poems, though, and consumed them - perhaps too quickly. I'd love to reread this book again and just take more time to soak up her work.
I enjoyed the introduction and how many ancient people wrote about her, and what they thought about her, but overall the translator can be quite dry. I'm not sure if this will be my favourite translation, but I am excited to read another edition or translation because it'll be like experiencing the book all over again.
Because of the translation and how formal it was, I will give this book 4 stars. c:
As a queer person, I really wanted to read her because I wanted to feel her voice and I always want queer women to be represented in work. For me, this book was really special because of how ancient it is, which proves to me that queer people have been around since forever, and always will be.
... unfortunately, though, Sappho's work is fragmentary. Fragmentary because she was a woman, and she loved other women. Many of her poems were burned of destroyed, despite the fact that she was one of Greece's first and most prolific lyrical poets. (She wrote nine books!) If I think about it for too long, I get angry. And then I get angry that years later, after finally acknowledging her importance, academics (most of them white, male and heterosexual) vehemently denied her sexuality at every turn.
If I could say one thing to her, I would apologise, both for how she was treated, and how her work was treated.
MOVING ON, away from my bitter rant. This translation felt a little bit formal for me, so I'd like to read some others and explore more of Sappho's work and how differently her poems can be recommended. I absolutely loved her poems, though, and consumed them - perhaps too quickly. I'd love to reread this book again and just take more time to soak up her work.
I enjoyed the introduction and how many ancient people wrote about her, and what they thought about her, but overall the translator can be quite dry. I'm not sure if this will be my favourite translation, but I am excited to read another edition or translation because it'll be like experiencing the book all over again.
Because of the translation and how formal it was, I will give this book 4 stars. c:
