Reviews

Swing Time by Zadie Smith

amyingomar's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.75

lynecia's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Check out my review for AYO Magazine
http://ayomag.com/ayo-books-swing-time-by-zadie-smith/

interestedinblackbooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

did not love at all.....

mickstrauther's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

I loved this! I was skeptical at first because of how many reviews complained that this book was “about nothing,” and I am notoriously someone who needs a solid plot in a novel. Instead of agreeing in the case of this book, I felt myself happily drawn forth by Smith’s writing, which is just so quick-witted and well done that this alone pulled me along. She’s not so dense that you can’t understand what she saying, but instead, your brain power goes toward finding and understanding the hints she’s dropping and the connections she is suggesting. She’s a clever writer, and because of this, I trusted her, even as the book veered into and away from Tracey, the narrator’s childhood friend, who the book largely revolves around.

I loved reading about the friendship between Tracey and the narrator. Books about childhood friends are incredibly intriguing to me, and this one did not fall short. But the other half of this book, which follows the narrator’s career as a PA for a pop star, was also such an interesting territory to explore. It did take me a while to get through the book, but mostly just because it’s not a fast-paced, anxiety inducing novel. That doesn’t necessarily detract from the parts I enjoyed. 

I would definitely recommend this book if you’re looking for great writing and some food for thought regarding race, relationships, class, performance, and family. It’s not exactly lighthearted, but I wouldn’t categorize it as dark either. 

bibliobrandie's review against another edition

Go to review page

I'm halfway through this book and am throwing in the towel. I find myself uninterested in the characters story and am not really sure where the plot is going.

nichecase's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

tracey bits > aimee bits > africa bits, though at the same time, i felt a bit like... ehh zadie you've done this whole "childhood friendship gets complicated" bit three times already. it's no surprise that it's good at this point! (for the record, zadie smith has been doing "best friend bildungsromans" since before it became a trend in bookselling.)

even though, to my estimation, this is her worst run-through of the theme, i can see how people would think it is a very, very good exploration of it: it goes to much darker places than smith has ventured before. no longer are friends ripped apart by semi-comic and semi-fantastic explorations of mouse cloning; now the inciting incident is something more akin to a long (and chronological) line of
Spoilerparanoid schizophrenia, pre-pubescent displays of sexuality, destruction of family members and blackmail.
this was the most interesting part of the book to me - this strong line of fatalism running through it, fate caused by social forces and prophesied by activists and sociologists
Spoiler(in particular, the narrator's mother, who predicted that the narrator would do well and tracey would not, despite their best efforts to shuck off these labels)
. it reminded me, in its own way, of a greek tragedy, and i wish it had been developed more as a coherent throughline and not just as scattered reflections on its more prominent (though still under-explored for my liking) motif of bad mothers.

the narration was also stale: smith's last four books have all had wonderfully wry omnipresent narrators in the tradition of forster, but this narrator was very much a blank wall in her narration (though she wasn't quit as much as a nothingness in her dialogue or characterisation). i think this kind of sapped the life out of much of the novel, because we were necessarily limited to her: the snippets of characterisation we find would, in a novel like [b:White Teeth|3711|White Teeth|Zadie Smith|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1374739885s/3711.jpg|7480] be fleshed out into paragraph-long digressions on the eventual fate of the character. this novel lacked that, and didn't even have an enjoyable narrative voice to make up for that loss. (which is a shame because, alongside forster, one of smith's stated influences is nabokov, that master of the off-kilter first person narrator.)

usnebojemesa's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

finally
this is almost a 2.5 stars for me

cesarreads's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

caro1234's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

the_end_of_june's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny inspiring reflective slow-paced
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0