Reviews tagging 'Ableism'

Happiness Falls by Angie Kim

74 reviews

isabellamarg's review

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional hopeful informative inspiring mysterious reflective sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

It is 2020, COVID is rampant, and the father of the Korean-American Park family goes missing on a Tuesday morning. The family's lives are upended in the wake of their fathers disappearance, including Mia who initially dismissed her fathers disappearance, and Eugene her younger brother who returns from the park he and his dad frequented bloodied and alone, without his father. 

Happiness Falls follows the ensuing investigation into the disappearance of Adam Parson and how the family and their secrets may have played a role in why he went missing. Eugene, the youngest son, is autistic and has Angelman syndrome which prevents him from being able to communicate verbally. This complicates the investigation as Eugene was the last person to see his father, and also makes the authorities suspicious of him as well as the Park family.

This book combined two of my favorite genres: mystery and family drama. There were plenty of shocking twists and the book posed many deep, philosophical questions about the assumptions we make about language, race, disabilities, immigrants, our family, and ourselves. I love that one of the reasons Angie Kim wrote this book was to highlight that "just because you can't speak doesn't mean you can't think or understand." Eugene and his disabilities play a large role in the treatment of the Park family throughout the investigation into the disappearance of their father. Eugene is labelled as "non-verbal" and the novel explores the implications of this title and how harmful it can be when thinking about how people express themselves and the limitations we place on others. This novel also focused on the aspect of happiness: what it means to be happy and how we can make ourselves and our family happier. As a family deeply affected by a child with a disability, how does this create guilt and resentment with the other siblings Mia and John as well as within their parents themselves? 

Overall, I went into this novel expecting a really intriguing and dark mystery and I was not disappointed. I did not expect the novel to focus so much on the aspect of language and verbalization, but I thought it was unique and allowed me to learn more about different speech therapy methods and hopefully un-train any biases I have regarding oral fluency being equated with intelligence. Happiness Falls beautifully captured the complexity and love of a family that is still learning to communicate with each other.
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

moriahleigh's review

Go to review page

emotional reflective sad medium-paced
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

thekatreturns's review

Go to review page

emotional hopeful mysterious reflective sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

I am absolutely blown away that this comes from the same author as Miracle Creek, which has been thoroughly critiqued for its intense ableism. But I guess this book is proof that people can learn and grow and change their behavior with more information and more relationships with those most affected. Because, my goodness, this book is everything the general public should be reading about nonspeakers with regard to disability politics. The difference between the two is ridiculous and near unbelievable, and yet, the trajectory of Angie Kim’s learning is very clear me as someone who has been immersed in autistic community since the mid aughts. I know exactly how she got here, it’s clear as day, she even names specific people she learned from in the authors notes, and yet I’m still astounded that she got there at all when so many don’t. Thank you, Angie, for listening to neurodivergent people, autistic people, and most specifically nonspeakers. For broadening your horizons from the people at the center of Miracle Creek, who mean well and yet do so much harm. For addressing the nonspeaking community’s relationship with pseudoscience, testing, and disbelief directly, in the text, in an incredibly thoughtful and empathetic way. And also, for writing a damn good literary mystery. 

Yeah, aside from this being a book that I’m heartened is doing well in sales and reviews because its message is so crucial for the world to understand- this is a great book and it is not at all too preachy about said message. 

Many other reviewers found Mia annoying, but it was extremely easy for me to get into her head. Probably because we have pretty much the same personality and thought patterns. I didn’t find anything annoying, but then again I am a huge sucker for footnotes in literature. I enjoyed the morphing of her observations
“we should have done this” “I wish this had happened this way” from being like “if this had happened differently maybe we’d have solved the mystery” to “if this had happened differently maybe I would feel differently.” It’s subtle, and maintains the tension longer than it could have otherwise.


The other criticism I found in reviews of the book was that it went too deep into philosophy and the mystery of the
dad’s Happiness Quotient experiments.
I disagree with these reviewers, because, well, the idea of Welcome to Holland (a seminal essay by Emily Perl Kingsley) is constantly on the mind for disabled people and their families. The philosophies presented are a natural fit, and their hyperlogical presentation by the characters is one of many signs of autistic traits in the rest of Eugene’s family and therefore quite realistic.

Which brings me to my final point. This is not a 5 star book for me, and it so, so easily could have been. I desperately wanted to
switch into Eugene’s perspective for an epilogue. Not to get answers to Mia’s burning questions, because I think it’s beautiful and metaphorically resonant that the family doesn’t have answers to everything. But to spend some time in his head, to give him the chance to write the ending to this chapter of his story. I can see how that would feel weird for Angie as she’s not nonspeaking herself, but I maintain it could have been done in collaboration with a nonspeaking cowriter. I can also see how that would be seen as indulging doubters by saying, “yes, this kid can write, here, look at him!” But he’s not real, so no real child is being made into a self narrating zoo exhibit. Plus, the line this book walks with presenting very conclusive proof of spelling for Eugene, and acknowledging the pain of doubt, is so deft that I trust Angie and her brain trust of nonspeaking people in the acknowledgments to have handled it. If this book ever gets a sequel about some other mystery happening to these characters, I want Eugene to narrate it.
My second criticism is that Matthew Rushin should be in the acknowledgments, given that
autistic young people navigating the legal system in Virginia
is a huge plot point. Was any of this story directly inspired by him? Probably not, the details are very different. But I seriously doubt the relevant laws in real life would exist without his story.

Also, sorry if it seems disrespectful that I’ve referred to the author as Angie throughout, just a habit in transcribing my previously orally expressed thoughts. I mean full respect when I say that everyone who’s ever been criticized for something they write should listen and learn like she has very clearly done. 
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

cheyarsen's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

4.5 stars ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️✨

Okay, I really loved this one. 

This book follows the perspective of Mia, the unabashedly and hyper-analytical daughter and sister of the Parkson family, following the disappearance of her father. No one seems to have any idea what could’ve happened to their father. No one except for Eugene, Mia’s little brother, who shows up at home the day of their father’s disappearance covered in blood. The only problem? Eugene has Angelman Syndrome and is nonverbal and can’t communicate what he has seen to his family. Now the Parkson Family must race against the clock, not only to find their father but to protect Eugene.

What this book got right for me:

✔️ Autism/Angelman Syndrome Representation
✔️ AAPI Representation 
✔️ S2C Representation
✔️ Open Ended
✔️ Unreliable Narrator (which added to the overall mystery)
✔️ No Happy Endings (I know what you’re thinking…how is this a good thing? Don’t worry, I’ll explain)

What I didn’t love:

✔️ The amount of talk about experiments (again, I’ll explain)
✔️ The passage of time 

I oftentimes forgot while reading this book that this was a work of fiction. Kim’s connection to the characters and their stories is evident through her writing. She cares about these characters, which in turn made me care about these characters. 

I think one of my favorite things about mysteries like these is they don’t end happily in real life a lot of times. This made it feel even more real to me. As devastated as I was by the ending, I don’t think it would’ve been as moving if it had had a happy ending.

One of my only problems with this book was the way passage of time felt like weeks fit into two days, I kept forgetting the timeline as I was listening to the book. I think this in part had to do with the over abundance of talk about the Happiness Quotient Experiment. While I found it super interesting, I don’t think it really contributed much to the book other than just being an interesting tidbit.

All in all I loved this book. This is my first book from Angie Kim and I look forward to reading her debut novel as well in the future.
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jjones2208's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious reflective
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes

5.0

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

smagzisreading's review

Go to review page

dark emotional inspiring sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

murve's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.25

I enjoyed the mix of mystery/thriller and social commentary, especially with how much Covid affected everyone in this story. It was satisfying to see all the pieces of this story finally come together, although I wish
it had a happier ending. :(


Thank you to the author, the publisher, and NetGalley for an eARC in exchange for my honest review.
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

maidinnah's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional informative mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

Cerebral, smart, and thought-provoking, Happiness Falls asks you to challenge your ingrained biases, reflect on the power of language, think about our need for closure, and ponder the meaning of happiness, all while slowing unfurling the mystery of a father’s disappearance. Mia’s presumptive and know-it-all attitude can be grating at times, especially since she’s the narrator. Additionally, this is a book that plays with a lot of ideas and ends with some open plot points, which may be unsatisfying to some readers. However, I was very invested in the Parksons, learning about who they are and how they feel about each other, especially Eugene, the non-speaking autistic youngest son, whose plight is as central to the story as the mystery. 
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

melodyseestrees's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.25

There are so many frustrating elements to this story, especially the ending. The character motivations seemingly make sense but the character actions do not necessarily match up quite right. There are many questions in the latter half of the book but don't hold your breath and wait for all the answers.
Mia goes 'eh, I don't care to know' and erases any evidence that was on her presumed deceased father's phone.
The end pacing also did not match up with how the rest of the story had been. A good portion of the dialogue around Eugene felt microaggression level ableist at best, though the surprise therapist at the end had the best dialogue with Eugene. Perhaps this is realistic but something about it felt off. This led to the rating falling from the expected 4 to a 3.25.
The edition I had did 'footnote' information in a jarring and disruptive way to the reading experience. Some whole pages had maybe a paragraph of information to them in an italicized font that was frustrating to read. These thoughts of Mia's surely could have been worked into the actual text as a mark of who she is as a person. 
There were a few characters who appeared, did maybe two actions, and then disappeared never to be seen again
looking at you unhinged lady in the park with pepper spray and supposedly existing band of teenage boys
. There were plot beats that were dropped.
We saw hints and part of the lead officer having seemingly faked one or two injuries in previous cases but this played very little in the hearing against Eugene for hurting her.
The notebook revealing that Mia's father was running experiments on his family, having no exploration done into it. Was he really just writing notes to himself? Was he writing a paper? Was he as unhinged as park pepper spray lady? We'll never know!
The police, having access to the same information as Mia not putting together the unlock code, as all of that info came from the notebook they were scanning and sending to Mia. Can police even do that during an active investigation?
Harmonee's backstory being sort of explained despite her having very little to do with the story. The perspective of familial trauma given was interesting but never really led anywhere. One could argue that whole history didn't need to be spelled out since it amounted to John was special cuz he looked white, Mia was treated like she was dumb because she didn't look white, Eugene witnessed a death firsthand, John and Mia learned how to whisper yell.

This book felt like it was trying to fit several stories into one- Harmonee's story, Mia's dad's story, Eugene's story, and Mia's memoir.
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lindseybkoehler's review

Go to review page

emotional funny hopeful informative inspiring mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.5

Expand filter menu Content Warnings