Reviews - The Sign of the Four

3.3k reviews for:

The Sign of the Four

Arthur Conan Doyle

3.61 AVERAGE

mrlollington12's review against another edition

3.5

adventurous mysterious slow-paced

Plot or Character Driven: A mix

Strong character development: No

Loveable characters: Yes

Diverse cast of characters: Yes

Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

gabiharvey's review against another edition

4.25

adventurous dark mysterious fast-paced

Plot or Character Driven: Plot

Strong character development: No

Loveable characters: Yes

Diverse cast of characters: No

Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

solid book. proof that a book doesn't need to be long to convey a great story.

taylercoates's review against another edition

3.5

adventurous challenging mysterious medium-paced

Plot or Character Driven: Plot

Strong character development: No

Loveable characters: Yes

Diverse cast of characters: Complicated

Flaws of characters a main focus: No

Not as good as #1, happy for the introduction of Mary Morstan but the rest just didn’t flow as well

Interesting conundrum but not as well written, found myself wanting to finish it just so it would be over

wardo2700's review against another edition

4.0

This is a great mystery that I think any reader would enjoy and especially those that are Sherlock Holmes fans. I think I liked this story better than the first novel but both are equally well written. I would recommend this book to any reader ten and older due to the fact murders are committed.

siren224's review against another edition

3.0

أنا اجلت قراءة مغامرات شارلوك فترة طويله لأنه ببساطه أنا بكره أسلوب الذكاء الخارق ده
شبه مستر بوارو وميس ماربيل
بس لما شفت المسلسل بقي عندي فضول
روايه حلوه
تحليله واستنتاجه حلو طبعا ومنطقي
معجبنيش جزء أنه زعلان الثوار الهنود قتلوا الانجليز
ما انتو محتلين بلادهم
مفهمتش ازاي سيخ وأسماءهم مسلمة برده
ظهر برده الغرور الانجليزي في الرواية جدا وهو بيتكلم عن البيض وعن المستعمرات
حبيت شارلوك اكتر من مستر بوارو بكتيييييير
اعتقد مش هتبقي القراءة الأخيرة