Scan barcode
Reviews tagging 'Injury/Injury detail'
Lycanthropy and Other Chronic Illnesses by Kristen O'Neal
12 reviews
courtneyfalling's review against another edition
funny
mysterious
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
Lots of reviewers have already pointed out issues with how Kristen O'Neal (a white author) constructs Priya (a Tamil American main character) and her family. Especially because Kristen O'Neal tried to argue this was Own Voices because she's chronically ill which... is not what Own Voices is, like one aspect of a character's identity aligning with yours does not make it Own Voices. Plus we get into kind of mixed territory since Priya has chronic Lyme and the author does not, so it's like... do different chronic illnesses experiences even still "count" as Own Voices? Diagnostic categories are constructs, but recognizing wildly varied chronically ill experiences given diagnostic journeys and labels plus other identities like race is critical?
Anyway. I'm just gonna link this because I think it highlights the biggest issues: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/3824728041. Brief media studies/pop culture studies rant, the cover is shitty. No one is arguing that the werewolf is Priya or a direct stand-in for another Desi character. But for the love of God, aesthetically, what this cover does is absolutely juxtapose a Desi character with a werewolf against a highly contrasted background, and that is still problematic! And on a larger systemic level this cover would've passed from illustrator to editors to marketers and not one was like, hmm, maybe this is not appropriate and will not make readers of color feel safe, and that's a huge problem. Like the combo of limited diversity in publishing, limited avenues for editors or marketers of color to really voice their concerns or make substantive changes, and white-audience-centric, profit-over-purpose structures in publishing is bad and this is a good, small-scale example of how it is bad, actually. Please make connections and consider the larger whole. ~Critical consumption~ and all that jazz.
Beyond the other criticisms I've seen about how O'Neal represents Priya and her family, I'll quickly add: they're really Christian and it's not a huge part of the book but it's also not written well at all. It feels very smushed in and there's no recognition or nuance at all around the distinct cultural barriers and biases that Christian Desi folks experience, besides a somewhat throwaway and underdeveloped mention of how they drove a little extra to a mostly Desi church. And it became pretty clear in the Acknowledgements that it's because O'Neal is very Christian and that affected how she wrote Priya's family's religious experiences and I just... do not like how any of this layers onto what is already Not Great Writing of a Desi Character and Family From A White Author.
Nothing else in the story is that great either. Chronically ill rep is eh (fine, not outstanding) but the main friendship between Priya and Brigid can get really frustrating plus O'Neal really needed to read some more perspectives from neurodivergent folks and others most affected by continuing eugenics rhetoric becauseit was all I could think about in Priya and Brigid's argument over Brigid's attempts to "cure" herself via literal poison. Like autistic children are murdered regularly by parents and guardians via similar "cures" like bleaches and other toxic poisons via similar rationales and someone really needed to take a step back and be like I get you are having a hard time, Brigid, and suicidality in chronic illness is real, but this is eugenicist shit . Especially in a book that is supposed to be taking on chronic illness rep well, like that was how it was sold and marketed. And when eugenicist rhetoric always impacts disabled and chronically ill folks of color most!
Anyway. I'm just gonna link this because I think it highlights the biggest issues: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/3824728041. Brief media studies/pop culture studies rant, the cover is shitty. No one is arguing that the werewolf is Priya or a direct stand-in for another Desi character. But for the love of God, aesthetically, what this cover does is absolutely juxtapose a Desi character with a werewolf against a highly contrasted background, and that is still problematic! And on a larger systemic level this cover would've passed from illustrator to editors to marketers and not one was like, hmm, maybe this is not appropriate and will not make readers of color feel safe, and that's a huge problem. Like the combo of limited diversity in publishing, limited avenues for editors or marketers of color to really voice their concerns or make substantive changes, and white-audience-centric, profit-over-purpose structures in publishing is bad and this is a good, small-scale example of how it is bad, actually. Please make connections and consider the larger whole. ~Critical consumption~ and all that jazz.
Beyond the other criticisms I've seen about how O'Neal represents Priya and her family, I'll quickly add: they're really Christian and it's not a huge part of the book but it's also not written well at all. It feels very smushed in and there's no recognition or nuance at all around the distinct cultural barriers and biases that Christian Desi folks experience, besides a somewhat throwaway and underdeveloped mention of how they drove a little extra to a mostly Desi church. And it became pretty clear in the Acknowledgements that it's because O'Neal is very Christian and that affected how she wrote Priya's family's religious experiences and I just... do not like how any of this layers onto what is already Not Great Writing of a Desi Character and Family From A White Author.
Nothing else in the story is that great either. Chronically ill rep is eh (fine, not outstanding) but the main friendship between Priya and Brigid can get really frustrating plus O'Neal really needed to read some more perspectives from neurodivergent folks and others most affected by continuing eugenics rhetoric because
Content Warnings
Graphic: Chronic illness, Injury/Injury detail, and Medical content
Moderate: Ableism, Abandonment, and Suicidal thoughts
Minor: Animal death
aviery's review against another edition
adventurous
emotional
funny
hopeful
lighthearted
mysterious
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Medical trauma, Suicidal thoughts, Injury/Injury detail, Chronic illness, and Body horror
Moderate: Gore, Medical content, and Mental illness
Minor: Animal cruelty and Cursing
More...