3.61 AVERAGE


i liked the story mire than the one of a study in scarlet, and i feel that i can appreciate the characterisation and banter of holmes and watson more than i could when i first read holmes stories at about fourteen. but the racism and colonial attitude was quite unbearable.
adventurous dark lighthearted fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: No

I think what I disliked, and a bit liked, in this story the most is that the mystery was solved in the first half of the book. I wanted that strange tingly feeling in my chest combined with an adrenaline rush and a quick flipping of pages (in my case, kindle buttons), but I didn't get it. In crime fiction, what a person likes best is that tension built up to the point where you can't take it anymore, at that point the answer must be given... but no, in here, instead I was left with a boring story on how everything happened which took more than 10% of the book, and which did not interest me much. In fact, I found myself distracted during a huge portion of it. A study in scarlet was way better. I liked the feeling of confusion I got in part II of that story.
A study in scarlet, also, seemed more interesting. This one had a nice looking summary that got me excited but which was revealed at the beginning of chapter II and, thus, I was not exactly hooked up.

I gave 4 stars for that exact beginning, and for the extreme intelligence and shrewdness, combined with extraordinary cognitive and deduction abilities that Sherlock Holmes, yet again, shows.

Oh, I also disliked the very unbelievable way in which Watson came to fall in love with Mary. Seriously, dude, at least take her out on a date first.

What I liked a lot too is Sherlock's addiction to cocaine. Arthur Conan Doyle did not struggle to make his main character lovable, but actually showed him with all his flaws: His hardheartedness, his addiction to cocaine as a cure for boredom (which of course doesn't make it excusable), and the fact that he is a fucking arse to everyone. I still like him a lot. I like his train of thoughts and his lack of prejudice, which is the scientific method I support wholeheartedly. And because I always imagine him as Robert Downey Jr. and damn that MAN IS HOTTTTTTTT!! Also, I am sapiosexual. I can't help not liking intelligent people.

Definitely not a favourite in this series.
lyserature's profile picture

lyserature's review against another edition

DID NOT FINISH

unsuccessful re-read. it was more exciting when i was nine.
adventurous funny lighthearted mysterious slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: No

from the opening paragraph depicting sherlock holmes shooting cocaine as a cure to boredem I could tell this would be an improvement on the previous novel from Arthur Conan Doyle.

Thoroughly enjoyed this novel and recommend to all!
adventurous mysterious slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: N/A
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: No
adventurous mysterious relaxing fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: No
adventurous challenging dark mysterious tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: N/A
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
adventurous mysterious fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes