shelbybelby's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny lighthearted medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

rose10's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

This is described as a modern retelling of P&P but I had issue that many of the characters and the writing were homophobic, and had other stances which didn't sit right with me. I'm not sure whether this was the author's intention, but it felt unnecessary in the story. I also felt that Liz's and Darcy's relationship lacked the spark which is a central part of the plot. 

While the setting and context of the story has certainly been updated, this book felt very uneven in its pacing, with chapters often being little more than a page and suddenly jumping from one plot point to a sudden random thing next and events being resolved very quickly. I felt this book had a lot of potential, and started out with some plot points which I thought could have been very interesting, but ultimately this book fell flat and missed the mark. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lenaricharz's review

Go to review page

fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

nothingforpomegranted's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny lighthearted fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

Like most devoted bookworms out there, I have a particular passion for Pride and Prejudice and all that Jane Austen has contributed to the literary world over the past two hundred years. 

Unfortunately, Curtis Sittenfeld's Pride and Prejudice retelling for The Austen Project just didn't cut it for me. Though Sittenfeld did an admirable job adjusting the Pride and Prejudice story to modern times in Cincinnati, incorporating characters and events in surprising but logical ways, her renditions of Liz, Darcy, and the rest of the Bennet family and cast were flat and unsatisfying.

We begin with the arrival of Chip Bingley, one-time star of find-love reality show Eligible in Cincinnati, where Liz and Jane Bennet have been visiting from New York after their father's heart attack only to discover the family house and financial situation in near ruin. While Liz prioritizes her job as a writer for a women's magazine and trying not to worry about her fourteen-year affair with her married best friend, Jasper Wick, Jane is pursuing motherhood through artificial insemination, which gets complicated when she enters a whirlwind flirtation with Chip Bingley himself. 

Of course, the true star of a Pride and Prejudice retelling should be one Fitzwilliam Darcy. Sittenfeld's Darcy is an accomplished neurosurgeon with massive California estate and a seeming commitment to bachelorhood. In fact, I quite liked this version of Darcy, and I appreciated Sittenfeld's acknowledgement of how much Darcy smiles in the original book (I certainly like him more than Sittenfeld's whiny, clueless Liz); however, as the book reached its climax, so much happened so quickly, and Darcy's sudden confession felt so much more unexpected and dramatic than the original. 

In short:
Jasper Wick sucks and the fact that Liz pined over him for over a decade is a shame, particularly for a character based on one of the most independent, feisty women in literature. 

Bingley and Jane were done very well. I loved Jane's modernized storyline, and I thought they both exhibited their characteristic naive sweetness in a charming way.

Lydia and Ham were intriguing and sympathetic, which is a bold move given the drama surrounding Lydia's storyline in the original. It's not clear to me whether Sittenfeld wanted this partnership to be as damning as Austen's, so I want to give her the benefit of the doubt and accept this as an interesting shift in the retelling. 

Mary weirdly got the last word, and I don't really understand what she did to deserve it. 

The discriminatory language--racist, homophobic, body shaming--was appalling, especially given this book's relatively recent publication date. Nearly every page had some sort of inappropriate comment or language, and it poisoned me against so many of the characters.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

diana_barv's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny lighthearted medium-paced
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

I can’t decide whether I liked this or not. It was fun I think, mostly the first half. But Mrs. Bennet was WAY too much and the way the book treated some issues... yikes.
The Chip and Jane romance was... okay. And Liz and Darcy had their moments but the part where “Darcy saves Lydia” just didn’t accomplished it like the original or other retellings.
Overall, I read it way faster that I thought I would and it was enjoyable most of the time

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
More...