Reviews with content warning for Death of parent - Fever Dream

Reviews tagging 'Death of parent'

Fever Dream by Samanta Schweblin

9 reviews

gotnoculture's review

Go to review page

dark sad tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? N/A
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

Content Warnings

morgue666's review

Go to review page

dark mysterious sad tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.25

Can’t help but think watching the movie before reading the book helped in some way but hindered in others. I imagine this is much more impactful when read by people in Argentina where they can read between the lines a little more and infer about the

impact of pesticides as this is environmental horror very clearly linked to Argentina’s current climate.

Content Warnings

hpfan9501's review

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious sad tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? N/A

Content Warnings

opal_scorpio's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5

super suspenseful and confusing book. i started it at like midnight thinking i’d just read a bit but instead i ended up staying awake until almost 4 am reading the whole thing in one sitting. and it was so worth it!!

i was so fascinated by the plot and how it’s laid out in a back and forth, conversational manner with David (who is probably a hallucination).

the environment being the villain/killer of the story was really interesting instead of it being david’s change haunting the town. it’s such a rational explanation that you don’t even think about it!! but the deformities and miscarriages of the children of the town and the mysterious animals deaths could be explained by whatever that chemical was in the barrels.

it’s sad that david is blamed for the spooky stuff when in reality his brain was probably fried from the illness that killed the horse and the subsequent fever that lasted for days, NOT his soul being split.

throughout the story it’s hard to tell what is reality and what is made up, but the entire conversation is probably also made up in amanda’s head. but i think what really drives home the “fever dream” is amanda seeing her husband visit david’s father looking for answers and her imagining her daughter had switched souls with david. so scary and kinda plausible within the world but since she, the narrator, dies at the end of the story it makes you, the reader, rethink everything she has recounted up until that point.

fantastic book!! 10/10!

(any technical issues i have with the book are being attributed to its translation from spanish to english. i think the plot was fantastic, just some words here and there that maybe didn’t make a lot of sense but again i think it’s a translation issue and not the author’s fault.)

Content Warnings

librarymouse's review

Go to review page

emotional mysterious reflective slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

I'm really not sure what to think of this book. It's very consumable. I read it in just over an hour. At a few points, I wondered if this book is an allegory for the changes that occur when a child starts showing signs of autism, since both David and Nina are noted to line up things just before their poisoning becomes severe. I'm not sure that that is the case, but this book, as per the title, reads like a fever dream. There's definitely a commentary being made on the visibility of disabled children, how they're viewed when the disability is developed, and on a wealth disparity between the urban well to do and the rural poor.

I'm sure if I were to read this again and again, I'd find a new understanding each time.

the confirmation of the migrations being done in the greenhouse being real, at the end, is an interesting twist (?). I don't know that it can be called a twist because David is co narrating, and were told by Carla that it is real, but Amanda's scepticism is infectious. Nina being in David's body at the end of the book, unrecognized by her father is heartbreaking. Carla saying that if she could have another child, she'd want one like Nina is made all the more unsettling and sad with the ending. Her tying knots, as if trying to reinstate the snapped, ineffable rope that connects her to her mother

Content Warnings

jjjreads's review

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional mysterious sad tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

Content Warnings

emi98's review

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

"A young woman named Amanda lies dying in a rural hospital clinic. A boy named David sits beside her. She's not his mother. He's not her child. Together, they tell a haunting story of broken souls, toxins, and the power and desperation of family."

Within the countryside there is the things you don't see in the city: a sense of isolation and disconnect that is claustrophobic when you may be facing troubles; a compulsion of anxiety, darkness, and fear the worst is about to come.

The mother Amanda was very well written, with her constant interjecting thoughts of her daughter and the measure of safety, or the "rescue distance" (which was the original title of the book, one I believe should have been kept), where she continuously calculates the reachable space to her child in order to stave off any potential harm to her:

"I always imagine the worse case scenario. Right now, for instance, I'm calculating how long it would take me to jump out of the car and reach Nina if she suddenly ran and leapt into the pool. I call it the "rescue distance": that's what I've named the variable distance separating me from my daughter, and I spend half the day calculating it, though I always risk more than I should."

It's an incredibly brilliant and intimate detail of parental anxiety that establishes such a good dynamic of a mother/child relationship; in contrast, the relationship between a local woman at Amanda's vacationing spot, Carmen and her son David, one irrevocably changed through contamination by poisoning of one careless mistake, makes for a disturbing contrast. One of the more brilliant moves was this mounting, dread-invoking fear continued with the fact that no matter how close children are, even right beside their respective parents, their hostile surrounding makes the rescue distance lose its power, as indicated by Amanda near the end:

"My mother always said something bad would happen. My mother was sure that sooner or later something bad would happen and now I can see it with total clarity, I can feel it coming toward us like a tangible fate, irreversible. Now there’s almost no rescue distance, the rope is so short that I can barely move in the room."

The run-on sentences, familiar in the Spanish language (and perhaps lesser so in its translation, but I digress), serve well to the unravelling of the duo's vacation, propelling the reader to critical moments

(the deformed children, the poisoning, the greenhouse, the hospital)

. The subsequent rhythm of the dialogue via sentence structure created a momentum that made it easy to finish in a single sitting (an hour for myself).

The novella took inspiration on the usage of pesticides and other (obviously harmful) chemicals dumped without concern in Argentina (although not the only country by far). Soy, the main culprit, is one of the largest monoculture cash crops, and reports of surrounding communities to these farms are devastating to read; people's health, security, and livelihood are all severely and at time, irreversibly impacted by these processes. Below is an excerpt from an interview with the author on the general foundation of this story:

"This story could be set anywhere. In fact, the first time I heard about pesticides and their terrible consequences was through a documentary about this subject in France. But, mainly because of corruption, Latin America has the worst agrochemical regulations and agreements. And Argentina, in particular, is one of the biggest importers of soya—one of the products more related with pesticides. We spread this soya all over the world; it is the base of a lot of our food. Soya is in everything: cookies, frozen fish, cereal bars, soups, bread, all kinds of flour, even ice cream!"

(Since when does soy have to be in everything? Will we one day see the impact of this consumption in our own communities? How haunting the innocent description of the waxy soy fields are in the work; how haunting when we discover the moment that everything is a danger to you?)

The deformity, whether through physical, mental, or spiritual matters, of the children is a central topic of this book. Although defects are a sensitive topic in the disability community (as many of the times it's used to demonize said character(s)), disability here is shown as a symbol of preventative violence towards children. The sense of wrongness isn't laid with the child---such as morality, or by God-willing, the latter common in many Latin-American communities, more so in countryside backgrounds---but rather the actions of third parties that harmed these children. Disability, loss, chaos; these and more are all the outcomes of poison, and are supposed to disturb our conscious.

We learn that transmigration of the soul is offered, by a village grandma (rather more a village witch), as the most tangible cure to these poisoning that often killed. Transmigration, or the movement of the soul after one's death, can serve its spiritual representation at how shattered whole communities are at violence; the hospital I suppose is supposed to represent some type of purgatory: there are worse things than death, and how those things can be both fleeting and never-ending. This act also, I believe, explored the fear of parents with their children---the othering of your own child, on how your child loses every sense of who they are and you of what they are---and inevitable consequences after the "worst case scenario" happens. <spoiler/>

The narrative is told entirely in dialogue, where there is little to no explanation for certain details or events. It's exactly as if someone who in the midst of a death-inducing fever would recount to you, as per the conversation of Amanda and David (italics):

(That is not important.

How can it not be? That's the story we need to understand.

No, that's not the story, it has nothing to do with the exact moment. Don't get distracted.)

I wouldn't say this was a new type of literary genre, I have seen comparisons to the horror sci-fi; almost fantastical, almost uncanny, but still unable to deny many facts of reality, (examples include VanderMeer's Annihilation/Area X series). The narration itself, with feverish ramblings and constant interjection, does remind me of Iain Reid's "I'm thinking About Ending Things", or basically any of David Lynch's work (which I believe the author is a fan of)--in particular, some dream sequences in Twin Peaks resonated strongly with this work. Horror is one of the genres to truly explore the effects of the evils of the world, it is where we attempt to translate this horrendous facts and our processing of said facts into a story that is absurd, yet so easily identifiable to the reader. Could something so monstrous affect any one of us---even on our best behaviour, even at our most-guarded moments, even when the rescue distance is at zero---and change us forever? Sources say yes.

It was, personally, an unsatisfactory ending just based on how the novel was written, leaving it more of a frustrating mystery (thus reflected in my rating, boohoo). Also, there could have been (even with its novella size) cuts to some dialogue as they were unnecessary (the worms for example: I was not a fan even though the visceral, raw things it's supposed to evocate is something I usually like) and caused a break in concentration in the otherwise smooth flow of the book.

Definitely worth a read… another great work in LA literature! :3c

Content Warnings

parasolcrafter's review

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious reflective tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

Content Warnings

meaghanelizabook's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

Content Warnings

More...