sinimini's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

I think I now know why this book is called “The Diary of a Madman and other Stories”. It is because the first one is the only one worth reading and the rest are there to make the book long enough to publish as a commodity. I had to stop after page 80 because the “other stories” felt like the actual ramblings of a madman. 

sirhe's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

"Can't you see that I don't have precicely that with which I could sniff?"

kxtaro's review

Go to review page

dark funny reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75

readingisadoingword's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging funny mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? N/A
  • Strong character development? N/A
  • Loveable characters? N/A
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A

4.0

 I read this collection of Gogol stories as part of #AYearOfRussianLit
This volume contains - The Diary of a Madman, The Nose, The Carriage, The Overcoat and Taras Bulba.
There's a lot to unpack from these short stories and a lot that I'm quite sure went far over my head!
In the first four stories all the protagonists are fixated by social status and their desire for recognition or advancement. There is a cynical insinuation that a higher status does not necessarily represent a "better" person and that not all those in positions of power are deserving - or at least are not unanimously regarded as deserving by their inferiors. In The Carriage and the Overcoat an external inanimate object takes on the power of impressing ones peers - surely a materialistic view of society?
All apart from Taras Bulba are absurd and grotesque stories with elements almost of magical realism and a dash of humour on some. On the whole I pitied the main characters and their foibles but sometimes I was a bit lost in the absurdity.
Taras Bulba was an altogether different type of story - more of a romanticised historical novella, it chronicled the escapades of elderly Cossack Taras and his two sons. The themes of loyalty, betrayal, religion and heritage were strongly presented and had a very contrasting tone to the preceding stories.
This was an interesting introduction to Gogol and intrigued me to read more and perhaps even re-read, as I feel these stories require more than one perusal to fully understand their nuances. I'm glad to have dipped my toe into Gogol's world. 

brontebabeblog's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

The word surreal can't quite do justice to these utterly bonkers short stories. This collection is hilarious and strange. Definitely one for lovers of the likes of Franz Kafka and Mikhail Bulgakov. I've honestly never laughed so hard as when I read The Diary of a Madman, but The Nose is in particular is also incredibly funny, ridiculous, and utterly brilliant. Just read them.

tasat's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny slow-paced

3.0

tcatsninfan's review against another edition

Go to review page

This collection of short stories is awesome so far, but we'll see how it turns out.

biasobreira's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Hilário, uma alegria de leitura. O único defeito é não ter tido o julgamento da porca parda.

assimbya's review

Go to review page

3.0

"The Overcoat" was superb, quite equal to the short stories of Anton Chekhov, but "The Nose" and "The Carriage" felt unfinished rather than intriguing, and "Taras Bulba" most assuredly not succeed in its obvious aims. I am left with a patchy, uneven impression of Gogol's abilities as a writer.
More...