Scan barcode
han_cat's review against another edition
4.0
A rather interesting David Lodge book, a tad over-long but very readable. I normally feel unsure about novelised biographies but I found this easy to accept as an imagined version of HG Wells based on a fair amount of research. But I don't think any of the characters in this book come out as likeable characters.
The main themes do get very repetative at points. Interestingly Lodge doesn't have any embarrassment writing the sex scenes but they aren't particularly good! I mostly enjoyed this for the mention of ideas in society i had very little knowledge, Fabians, free love etc. Overall it's an interesting read but by no means perfect.
The main themes do get very repetative at points. Interestingly Lodge doesn't have any embarrassment writing the sex scenes but they aren't particularly good! I mostly enjoyed this for the mention of ideas in society i had very little knowledge, Fabians, free love etc. Overall it's an interesting read but by no means perfect.
scotchneat's review against another edition
3.0
David Lodge's take on the last days of HG Wells.
It's 1944, and Wells is hiding in Regent's Park and thinking back on his life. Lots of books, rancour, affairs, women and politics, plus some crazy family dynamics as people fight for his attention and his money.
Through time, we see Wells' rise as a popular writer and his sometimes contradictory views on society and his definite views on open relationships. And sometimes he was a bit of a dick.
I do hear more Lodge than Wells in some of the writing, as though the we are and yet are not getting a first-person account.
It's 1944, and Wells is hiding in Regent's Park and thinking back on his life. Lots of books, rancour, affairs, women and politics, plus some crazy family dynamics as people fight for his attention and his money.
Through time, we see Wells' rise as a popular writer and his sometimes contradictory views on society and his definite views on open relationships. And sometimes he was a bit of a dick.
I do hear more Lodge than Wells in some of the writing, as though the we are and yet are not getting a first-person account.
reader_fictions's review
3.0
A Man of Parts is a fictional biography of author H.G. Wells. I did not go into this book knowing anything about H.G. Wells, except for his having written quite a few novels and his being one of the founders of the genre of science fiction. Given that, I cannot assert with complete assurance that the events related in Lodge's book are all faithful representations of the author's life, but I suspect they are. The extensive acknowledgements certainly suggest that Lodge did his research before writing the book, not that I would expect less.
Why, then, is this written as a novel, rather than a biography? My suspicion is that it is simply much more fun to write historical fiction than a strictly correct biography. Why? Because, had he written this as nonfiction, he would have been unable to put words into the mouths of the characters, and would have had to rely solely on, instead, the literature, letters and speeches of Wells. While that does a lot, it does not give the same freedom that the label of fiction does.
This is my second experience with David Lodge, although my only successful one, as I gave up on the first book of The Campus Trilogy quite swiftly. I found the opening pages not at all to my liking and decided to move on. Lured by the interesting subject matter here, I could not resist requesting a copy of A Man of Parts. Thankfully, I found myself much more drawn to the book than I ever expected. The writing is excellent and what I learned completely shocking. Impressed by this one, I will definitely be giving The Campus Trilogy another go, especially since Penguin was kind enough to give me the new, completely gorgeous edition containing the whole of the trilogy with this book.
You may wonder why I found the contents of the novel so entirely shocking. That's because it turns out that H.G. Wells was one heck of a horndog. Seriously. He spent all of his time that was not devoted to writing pursuing sexual intercourse with various ladies, most of whom were many years his junior. Many of these sexual partners were authors like himself.
Honestly, the descriptions of Wells' social life and his completely nutty (and hypocritical) opinions on sexual relations were the most intriguing part of the book. Wells espoused a belief in free love, although he did (mostly) attempt to only sleep with women he cared for, although, given the opportunity, any relatively good looking woman would do. (On one occasion, he even slept with a woman with a shriveled hand.)
At the same time, Wells fervently believed in the institution of marriage. He married twice (the first, which was to his cousin by the way, ended in divorce, since he wanted to marry his second wife, Jane). Both marriages were passionless, which increased his straying. Jane seems to have been okay with it, although certainly not thrilled. I imagine she was not as pleased with the arrangement as Wells seems to have believed. Despite his constant straying, Wells was remarkably constant to Jane, and never really wanted to leave her. Of course, his affairs also had other consequences, like babies and scandal. It's funny how this is never the part of history that you get to learn about in school.
Lodge largely uses a pretty straightforward narrative style (third person, mostly following Wells' viewpoint). However, he occasionally switches to a very strange style, wherein H.G. Wells responds to some sort of interviewer. I'm not entirely sure what to make of these sections, but they did tend to be fascinating, since the voice really liked to probe Wells about the subjects he least wished to discuss. I suspect that this was either employed solely as a narrative device or, perhaps more likely, was used to depict Wells' dementia at the end of his life, as he tried to account for his behavior.
While I did enjoy the novel, I will warn that it is not an especially quick read, or, at least, it was not for me. Nonetheless, I found it to be well worth the time, and, if you ever want to have your illusions of a classical author shattered, this is definitely the way to go.
Why, then, is this written as a novel, rather than a biography? My suspicion is that it is simply much more fun to write historical fiction than a strictly correct biography. Why? Because, had he written this as nonfiction, he would have been unable to put words into the mouths of the characters, and would have had to rely solely on, instead, the literature, letters and speeches of Wells. While that does a lot, it does not give the same freedom that the label of fiction does.
This is my second experience with David Lodge, although my only successful one, as I gave up on the first book of The Campus Trilogy quite swiftly. I found the opening pages not at all to my liking and decided to move on. Lured by the interesting subject matter here, I could not resist requesting a copy of A Man of Parts. Thankfully, I found myself much more drawn to the book than I ever expected. The writing is excellent and what I learned completely shocking. Impressed by this one, I will definitely be giving The Campus Trilogy another go, especially since Penguin was kind enough to give me the new, completely gorgeous edition containing the whole of the trilogy with this book.
You may wonder why I found the contents of the novel so entirely shocking. That's because it turns out that H.G. Wells was one heck of a horndog. Seriously. He spent all of his time that was not devoted to writing pursuing sexual intercourse with various ladies, most of whom were many years his junior. Many of these sexual partners were authors like himself.
Honestly, the descriptions of Wells' social life and his completely nutty (and hypocritical) opinions on sexual relations were the most intriguing part of the book. Wells espoused a belief in free love, although he did (mostly) attempt to only sleep with women he cared for, although, given the opportunity, any relatively good looking woman would do. (On one occasion, he even slept with a woman with a shriveled hand.)
At the same time, Wells fervently believed in the institution of marriage. He married twice (the first, which was to his cousin by the way, ended in divorce, since he wanted to marry his second wife, Jane). Both marriages were passionless, which increased his straying. Jane seems to have been okay with it, although certainly not thrilled. I imagine she was not as pleased with the arrangement as Wells seems to have believed. Despite his constant straying, Wells was remarkably constant to Jane, and never really wanted to leave her. Of course, his affairs also had other consequences, like babies and scandal. It's funny how this is never the part of history that you get to learn about in school.
Lodge largely uses a pretty straightforward narrative style (third person, mostly following Wells' viewpoint). However, he occasionally switches to a very strange style, wherein H.G. Wells responds to some sort of interviewer. I'm not entirely sure what to make of these sections, but they did tend to be fascinating, since the voice really liked to probe Wells about the subjects he least wished to discuss. I suspect that this was either employed solely as a narrative device or, perhaps more likely, was used to depict Wells' dementia at the end of his life, as he tried to account for his behavior.
While I did enjoy the novel, I will warn that it is not an especially quick read, or, at least, it was not for me. Nonetheless, I found it to be well worth the time, and, if you ever want to have your illusions of a classical author shattered, this is definitely the way to go.
roba's review against another edition
4.0
It took David Lodge a hundred or so pages to convince me that a novelistic approach to this biography was worthwhile. But he clearly had enough good source material (including very personal letters - some of them illustrated with 'sad panthers' and the like) to fuel what turns out to be a very lively and entertaining - but also authentic feeling - read.
Wells is an engrossing character (and a cheeky sod), embroiled with a host of interesting women, and friend and/or rival of many famous figures of the early 20th century. Lodge animates them all convincingly, particularly Wells, who he clearly likes greatly, but not without an eye for his faults.
Wells is an engrossing character (and a cheeky sod), embroiled with a host of interesting women, and friend and/or rival of many famous figures of the early 20th century. Lodge animates them all convincingly, particularly Wells, who he clearly likes greatly, but not without an eye for his faults.
More...