Reviews

Planetfall by Emma Newman

mebius's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional informative mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

Loved the book. MC, story, worldbuilding. My only gripe is ending felt a bit rushed and no explanations,
why original splintered group didn't tried to reach main settlement and expose Mack lies
.

bluefoxx's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

3.5. Started listening to this as something to kill time at work but I finished it a little too quickly for it to serve that purpose lol. Not sure if I’ll continue right away but I’ll keep it in mind if I’m in a slump in the future.

einnymydog's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

crimsoncor's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Liked it I guess, but didn't love it. It was an interesting character study that ultimately didn't feel like it led somewhere.

emath98's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

wishfulfillment's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

Dropping at 10%. I appreciate how accessible this was and how extremely fast-paced, but it was too much too fast for me and I couldn't keep up. I might want to give this a second try in a couple of years.

frasersimons's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional mysterious reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

This went by much more fast than I thought it would. Though the scope of the plot was myopic and straight-forward, the interiority of the anxiety ridden main character did a good job of keeping and ramping up tension. The parts where it was contrived felt alright to me as well, since it’s from her perspective, which is clearly altered due to her health. As someone now medicated for their own anxiety, if you expect people to think and act rationally, or interpret, to some degree, what others are doing, rationally, that’s not how it works. It’s one of the reasons why simply pointing out solutions or the problems themselves tends to be highly ineffective. 

It was easy to feel for the MC and the world building was interesting, but not new. I probably would have liked this even more had I read it closer to release, since now the ideas behind the sustainability and in general, technologically, feel fairly old hat.  

Very curious as to where the series goes from here. Originally picked it up because the sequel is an often labelled as cyberpunk, and I have an ongoing interest and project, where I read through a lot of that subgenre. (Even if quite a few books shelved as such end up not actually being so.)

being_b's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Like many other reviewers, I was delighted by the excellent portrayal of a mentally ill protagonist (anxiety! OCD!) and pleased to have a queer protagonist. The novel reminded me of [b: Crime and Punishment|7144|Crime and Punishment|Fyodor Dostoyevsky|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1382846449s/7144.jpg|3393917]: It explores how a terrible secret can warp a person and eventually an entire community, and the awful winding tension it causes in Ren's internal life as it fractures her relationships to others.

This brings us to the SFnal elements. The worldbuilding for the Earth they left behind was excellent, detailed yet lying lightly on the story rather than weighting it down with infodumpery. Unfortunately, the worldbuilding for their new planet was absolutely sparse. I think this may have been an intentional choice meant to further illustrate the isolating effect of secrets, and how the great lie at the foundation of the colony has prevented them from becoming truly part of their new world. Since the SFnal elements are primarily in the setting, however, this has the effect of divorcing the genre elements from the plot:
SpoilerThe heart of the story could easily have been told without traveling to another planet.


The ending was disappointing:
SpoilerRen's struggles are swept away by God's city, which seems to magically "cure" her mental illness. There's no real hint as to why Ren was able to see what the enigmatic Suh couldn't. Ren's discovery, "cure," and ascension feel tacked-on, like the author had written themselves into a corner- after a story so focused on Ren's interior life and her struggles relating to others, it felt really cheap to have an ending that takes her away from everyone else and uses an unknown mechanism to "fix" her.


Still, the first 90% of the book was fantastic.

emmaloho's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional mysterious sad fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

this book never fails to absolutely crush me. the building of the plot with both past memory and present mental illness is so well done, and the ending is incredible. both times I've read it now the kick off to the climax had me breathless, shoulders locked, jaw hung open, nauseated. the scifi world building is in my opinion masterful, both the human tech to the alien gods city. anyone who enjoys scifi should read this book

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ericmcdaniel's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75