Scan barcode
val_theburrowofstories's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? N/A
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
Graphic: Medical content, Medical trauma, Injury/Injury detail, Cursing, Confinement, and Abandonment
Moderate: Excrement
omiii's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
I've smiled at this book and laughed at it a few more times than I should have. This book is heavy on sarcasm, situational absurdity, and problem-solving. From conflicts that are actually extremely interesting (how would you go about growing crops on Mars?) to ones that are a bit more mundane and underwhelming (Mark's encounter with the sandstorm leaves... a lot to be desired?), it certainly does have its ups and downs. However, the downs are certainly made more bearable by the humor and expositionary narration that the story provides.
I'd say to give it a read if you like constant exposition and sarcasm-laced commentary. It's certainly an interesting take on what a sarcastic dumbass would do, trapped on a planet alone.
Minor: Abandonment and Suicidal thoughts
megmahoney1's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
Minor: Abandonment, Injury/Injury detail, Suicidal thoughts, and Confinement
singalana's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.25
Minor: Medical content, Rape, Self harm, Suicidal thoughts, Blood, Confinement, Fire/Fire injury, Abandonment, and Injury/Injury detail
alisonfaith426's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Diverse cast of characters? No
4.5
Graphic: Car accident, Confinement, Cursing, Excrement, Injury/Injury detail, and Abandonment
kate_has_book_thoughts's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
Graphic: Abandonment
Minor: Excrement, Blood, Cursing, Grief, Car accident, Suicidal thoughts, Injury/Injury detail, and Cannibalism
heather_harrison's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
“I can't wait till I have grandchildren. “When I was younger, I had to walk to the rim of a crater. Uphill! In an EVA suit! On Mars, ya little shit! Ya hear me? Mars!”
Does it cram in science and maths more than any fiction should enjoyably? Yes, sometimes. Particularly towards the last 10% of the book. But it was still an enjoyable read, with personality and flare and cringeworthy humour.
“Also, I have duct tape. Ordinary duct tape, like you buy at a hardware store. Turns out even NASA can’t improve on duct tape.”
There was some nuance lacking compared to Project Hail Mary, and you can definitely see that Weir has been honing his craft.
“He’s stuck out there. He thinks he’s totally alone and that we all gave up on him. What kind of effect does that have on a man’s psychology?”
He turned back to Venkat. “I wonder what he’s thinking right now.”
LOG ENTRY: SOL 61
How come Aquaman can control whales? They’re mammals! Makes no sense.
I will say, there were parts were the narration was a little hard to follow as we jumped between perspectives with the one narrator.
[12:04]JPL: We’ll get botanists in to ask detailed questions and double-check your work. Your life is at stake, so we want to be sure. Also, please watch your language. Everything you type is being broadcast live all over the world.
[12:15]WATNEY: Look! A pair of boobs! -> (.Y.)
P.S.: It made my happier than it should to hear Watney mention wanting to move to Western Australia (due to it being on the opposite side of the world to Idaho and the state's obvious connection to potato farming). I don't care that this is a fictional character, it brings me joy
Graphic: Abandonment
saskiahill's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
5.0
Graphic: Abandonment
Moderate: Death, Suicidal thoughts, Medical content, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Colonisation
serotiny11's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
But. There’s no character development to speak of - many of the characters are flattened to a single character trait that becomes their entire personality. The author does not seem to be interested in psychology at all and more into the science problems and survival…which would sure make for a fun space movie, but dragged as a story, for me anyway.
The whole book was a series of life-or-death scenarios that Mark would invariably get out of the very next day through a combination of wild ingenuity and unbelievable good luck. Every single time. Which made the pacing and outcome of each scenario increasingly repetitive and predictable. As this was originally published as blog posts, makes sense, but really reads like an exercise the author was entertaining himself with—what crazy problem can Mark deal with today, and how will he solve it? Each one was interesting individually and would be great as a blog post but as a book, ehh.
Last issue I had was with Mark's entries themselves. There were weird tense issues at the beginning that threw me off, and he would go back and forth between using very technical language, but then explain something really obvious like what CO2 stands for…I was wondering who his log entries were actually intended for? Surely not just NASA, surely not just laypeople…I keep coming back to this book feeling like a fun science-writing experiment for the author that doesn’t entirely work as a novel.
Ok one more…Mark became increasingly unlikeable for me….juvenile jokes became his whole personality (funny at first, but got old), and there was a casual use of some language related to s*xual assault that kicked me right out of the book.
Sigh…definitely fun at times, but not nearly as good as I had expected.
Graphic: Abandonment
Minor: Rape
elijah__'s review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Abandonment
Minor: Injury/Injury detail, Suicidal thoughts, and Cannibalism