Take a photo of a barcode or cover
4.0 AVERAGE
4.0 AVERAGE
informative
slow-paced
challenging
informative
medium-paced
challenging
sad
medium-paced
I wanted to read this because I've become interested in Seneca's philosophy writings, but it turned out that Dying Every Day didn't have much philosophy in it. It didn't even have as much Seneca as I had expected in it, given the title. It was really more about Nero, and the "satellite people" who were in and out of his life. Seneca was probably the most prominent and visible of those, but the book would probably have more accurately been described as a dive into Nero and his court. Nonetheless, I enjoyed the book, and the deeper background it gave me into that period and place. It is well written, well-researched, and now having read it, I believe it was worth the time I invested in it.
What makes someone a great teacher?
A great student.
That's the reason why Annie Sullivan is among the first great teachers who come to mind--not because of the remarkable teaching methods immortalized in The Miracle Worker, but because of the remarkable public intellectual that Helen Keller became.
That's the reason why Socrates is immortal--not only because he was such a brilliant thinker, but also because his student, Plato, turned out to be a pretty renowned philosopher in his own right.
There are other great teacher-student duos: Ambrose and St. Augustine, Aristotle and Alexander the Great, to name a few more.
Of course, this coin has an opposite side--and it was the primary reason why I read James Romm's Dying Every Day this month.
It is a wicked student that makes one a wicked teacher.
In the annals of history, there are few characters more notoriously wicked than Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus, who ruled Rome from 54 to 68 AD. His reign of terror is remembered for the burning of Rome, the first persecutions of Christian, and the violent termination of his incestuous relationship with his mother, Agrippina.
Almost as bad--considering that this is a critique of Nero's teacher--was the fact that the young emperor was a poor poet, despite his desire to perform in public and earn the adulation of Roman audiences (with his hooligans milling through the crowd to ensure enthusiasm).
Nero's teacher was Seneca, probably better-known today as one of Rome's most famous playwrights and Stoic philosophers. Seneca had been rescued from exile in Corsica by Agrippina, hand-picked to tutor the young Nero while the boy's mother plotted the murder of his adopted father, the Emperor Claudius. (Somehow we can't blame Nero's misdeeds on his mother's brother, the heinously evil Uncle Caligula, who was long gone from the scene.)
Seneca followed Nero upon his accession to the imperial throne following Claudius's death, writing the teenaged emperor's first speeches and acting--along with Agrippina--as a chief adviser.
Romm follows the ethical dilemmas that dogged one of Rome's most prominent ethical thinkers through a progression of teacher, adviser, advocate and target of the mad Roman princeps (a term that Romm uses instead of emperor throughout the book). His chapter titles reflect Nero's crimes: Suicide (I and II), Regicide, Fratricide, Matricide, Maritocide and Holocaust. In many of these these crimes Seneca was an accomplice. From each of them Seneca benefitted.
Romm is sympathetic to Seneca to a point:
But Romm brings to light many of Seneca's weaknesses--which might not be evident to readers of Seneca's works which place Reason preeminent above wealth, power and love.
Seneca, the son of a Roman knight, a few rungs down the social ladder from most senators, amassed a huge fortune to go along with his political power in Nero's court. Romm finds allegations that Boudicaa's Rebellion in faraway Britain may have been caused, in part, by Seneca's insistence on calling in loans in the colony, raising the ire of Britons.
How ironic is it that the poet who wrote, "all the world's gold mines, heaped up into a single pile, would not be worth the frown on the face of a good man," possessed quite a few gold mines in his own rite (112).
By the end of Seneca's life, his fortune is too much. He tries to give most of it back to Nero in exchange for a peaceful retirement. His request is refused. The paranoid Nero keeps his enemies close. His allies closer.
Romm intersperses his history with examples from Seneca's works, showing how the moralist tried to represent ideals in his works that he fell far short of in real life.
The final contradiction of Seneca's life was his title as a teacher. Plyny the Elder, who wrote a generation later, called him pinceps eruditorum or 'educator of emperors.' His critics, among which was the writer, Cassius Dio, who left a detailed account of his role in Nero's court, preferred the term, tyrrannodidaskalos or "tyrant teacher" (217).
A great student.
That's the reason why Annie Sullivan is among the first great teachers who come to mind--not because of the remarkable teaching methods immortalized in The Miracle Worker, but because of the remarkable public intellectual that Helen Keller became.
That's the reason why Socrates is immortal--not only because he was such a brilliant thinker, but also because his student, Plato, turned out to be a pretty renowned philosopher in his own right.
There are other great teacher-student duos: Ambrose and St. Augustine, Aristotle and Alexander the Great, to name a few more.
Of course, this coin has an opposite side--and it was the primary reason why I read James Romm's Dying Every Day this month.
It is a wicked student that makes one a wicked teacher.
In the annals of history, there are few characters more notoriously wicked than Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus, who ruled Rome from 54 to 68 AD. His reign of terror is remembered for the burning of Rome, the first persecutions of Christian, and the violent termination of his incestuous relationship with his mother, Agrippina.
Almost as bad--considering that this is a critique of Nero's teacher--was the fact that the young emperor was a poor poet, despite his desire to perform in public and earn the adulation of Roman audiences (with his hooligans milling through the crowd to ensure enthusiasm).
Nero's teacher was Seneca, probably better-known today as one of Rome's most famous playwrights and Stoic philosophers. Seneca had been rescued from exile in Corsica by Agrippina, hand-picked to tutor the young Nero while the boy's mother plotted the murder of his adopted father, the Emperor Claudius. (Somehow we can't blame Nero's misdeeds on his mother's brother, the heinously evil Uncle Caligula, who was long gone from the scene.)
Seneca followed Nero upon his accession to the imperial throne following Claudius's death, writing the teenaged emperor's first speeches and acting--along with Agrippina--as a chief adviser.
Romm follows the ethical dilemmas that dogged one of Rome's most prominent ethical thinkers through a progression of teacher, adviser, advocate and target of the mad Roman princeps (a term that Romm uses instead of emperor throughout the book). His chapter titles reflect Nero's crimes: Suicide (I and II), Regicide, Fratricide, Matricide, Maritocide and Holocaust. In many of these these crimes Seneca was an accomplice. From each of them Seneca benefitted.
Romm is sympathetic to Seneca to a point:
Seneca had made the bargain that many good men have made when agreeing to aid bad regimes. On the one hand, their presence strengthens the regime and helps it endure. But their moral influence may also improve the regime's behavior or save the lives of its enemies. For many, this has been a bargain worth making, even if it has cost them--as it may have cost Seneca--their immortal soul (133).
But Romm brings to light many of Seneca's weaknesses--which might not be evident to readers of Seneca's works which place Reason preeminent above wealth, power and love.
Seneca, the son of a Roman knight, a few rungs down the social ladder from most senators, amassed a huge fortune to go along with his political power in Nero's court. Romm finds allegations that Boudicaa's Rebellion in faraway Britain may have been caused, in part, by Seneca's insistence on calling in loans in the colony, raising the ire of Britons.
How ironic is it that the poet who wrote, "all the world's gold mines, heaped up into a single pile, would not be worth the frown on the face of a good man," possessed quite a few gold mines in his own rite (112).
By the end of Seneca's life, his fortune is too much. He tries to give most of it back to Nero in exchange for a peaceful retirement. His request is refused. The paranoid Nero keeps his enemies close. His allies closer.
Romm intersperses his history with examples from Seneca's works, showing how the moralist tried to represent ideals in his works that he fell far short of in real life.
The final contradiction of Seneca's life was his title as a teacher. Plyny the Elder, who wrote a generation later, called him pinceps eruditorum or 'educator of emperors.' His critics, among which was the writer, Cassius Dio, who left a detailed account of his role in Nero's court, preferred the term, tyrrannodidaskalos or "tyrant teacher" (217).
Was Seneca a brilliant writer and teacher? An opportunistic hypocrite? How could he live with himself, praising simplicity and poverty while living in eye-popping opulence and wealth? How could he have witnessed, or even advised, matricide, fratricide, and general mayhem and retained any sense of personal morality? Did he came back to himself late in life? Why did he vacillate and accommodate and even write Nero's speeches that veiled murder with the most gossamer fabric? Even his busts show these contrasts: one bust looks like a fleshy bureaucrat, the other like a half-starved ascetic (the second one is known as pseudo-Seneca and may have been sculpted to show his "inner Stoic qualities" rather than his outward form). So who was he, really?
James Romm does an excellent job of not deciding for us how to judge the life of Seneca. As a result, we get to witness the searingly difficult choices of a sane man living in a time of extraordinary madness. I've admired and valued Seneca's writings but had a sort of Wikipedia-depth understanding of his life circumstances. This book made me admire him all the more - admiration mixed with pity, disappointment, and quite a few shocks.
Who knows how bad the reign of Nero would have been without Seneca and Burrus to ameliorate some of his worst impulses? Another way to think about this is: what if Pol Pot had had a Seneca? Could his mitigating influence have saved 1.5 million Cambodian lives? A mad emperor can wreak an awful carnage. One adviser who can turn the emperor's mind even a few degrees can be invaluable.
Thanks to this book, I have a more nuanced understanding of Seneca as an actual human being rather than only a name on the front cover of a collection of intellectual exercises and abstract principles.
James Romm does an excellent job of not deciding for us how to judge the life of Seneca. As a result, we get to witness the searingly difficult choices of a sane man living in a time of extraordinary madness. I've admired and valued Seneca's writings but had a sort of Wikipedia-depth understanding of his life circumstances. This book made me admire him all the more - admiration mixed with pity, disappointment, and quite a few shocks.
Who knows how bad the reign of Nero would have been without Seneca and Burrus to ameliorate some of his worst impulses? Another way to think about this is: what if Pol Pot had had a Seneca? Could his mitigating influence have saved 1.5 million Cambodian lives? A mad emperor can wreak an awful carnage. One adviser who can turn the emperor's mind even a few degrees can be invaluable.
Thanks to this book, I have a more nuanced understanding of Seneca as an actual human being rather than only a name on the front cover of a collection of intellectual exercises and abstract principles.
Absolutely excellent book on Seneca and his writings compared to his actions in the court of Nero. I loved Ghost on the Throne and loved this book. James Romm has become one of my favorite authors. His work is quality.
challenging
informative
slow-paced
I really enjoyed this book as we see the historical side of what Seneca experienced along side his Emperor Nero. This book does an excellent job bringing in family backgrounds and gives you a good perspective on how Seneca lived his life to the end.
Interesting times always include interesting people. Seneca clearly is one of those interesting people. However, both in the past and ever since, he remains an enigma, and so is his relationship with Nero. This volume seems to find Tacitus' account the most reasonable, even though no conclusion is drawn, then or now. Lots of history, biography episodes of many prominent people of the times. The oddest example, Octavia, who lived through her father killing her mother, her stepmother killing her father, her husband killing her brother, and in the end, her husband killing herself. Of course all of these murders were related through incestuous interbreeding and marriages, mostly illegal even at the time. This incest and murder appears to be the problem of hereditary succession, regardless of the title of the leader or the population being governed, if even it was governing.