medium-paced

Great use of research balanced with story telling

I enjoyed it in general. But (although I've found the reasons she mentioned for which some women rejected good partners unreasonable) I do not agree on the main point of the book that women are "demanding/picky" and that's why they remain single!
If men are "not demanding" because they look for low maintenance wives who can just keep their homes warm, then women should be "demanding". Men do not need to consider matters like financial stability for instance when they look for potential wives, women need. Men do not need to pay much attention to qualities like being responsible, women need.
It's a matter of needs rather than wants; women just have different and more needs (most of them are triggered by the fact that we do live in a male-dominated world)!

I haven’t thought as much about any single book I’ve read this year but overall— this book is the biggest proof of the tragedy of heterosexuality I’ve ever read in my life.

As in, I finished it and immediately started reading the tragedy of heterosexuality. Which seems like, a necessary counterpoint to this depressed, subservient book

I am VERY GLAD I read it (speaking as a 22 year old ) and I truly will try to get all my peers to read it, but not as guidance. It’s genuinely far more useful as a meditation on the obsession of society with a) marriage and b) mediocre men.

More thoughts to come but they’re gonna have to be like a doctoral thesis because this book is DOUR and PASSIVE

This popped up on Libby and I gave it a go since I really like the author's work on some podcasts I've listened to. While there were sentiments of this book I really liked, there was a lot I didn't. It was very depressing and made me even more grateful for my relationship...at several points I paused my reading to hug Drew a little closer

Everyone should read this book!!!

Read this after ‘Maybe You Should Talk To Someone’ which I LOVED and was quite disappointed
reflective

Or . I don't know why I found this book as irritating and ridiculous as I did, but it might have something to do with the author's lack of awareness about her own sense of privilege. She suggests that women need to get over themselves and their laundry lists of desired traits in a partner and “settle” (no longer a bad word) for the "good enough" guy who might be right under their noses lest they end up over 40 and unmarried. While others have criticized Gottlieb for her desire to be married and to have a traditional family, I don't think she or any woman is somehow anti-feminist for wanting a “traditional family.” Rather, I am bothered that Gottlieb fails to acknowledge the privilege she shares with her over-40 and single compatriots who dismiss men for the most trivial reasons. This dilemma of ending up partnerless at 40 is not unique to middle and upper class white women. Many women of color end up partnerless not because of their own impossible standards and neuroses, but because of an unfavorable demographic realities. That said, I find it a little hard to be sympathetic to Gottlieb’s dilemma…
emotional funny lighthearted reflective medium-paced

Interesting, too long, but made the point without, I thought, being misogynist.