Reviews

The Castle of Crossed Destinies by Italo Calvino

corprew's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

A great book for insight into how the human mind makes and interprets symbols.

grayjay's review against another edition

Go to review page

It was okay. I appreciate Calvino's obsession with writing stories based on random sets of tarot cards, but I didn't find the stories very interesting or nuanced.

hiraether's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging slow-paced

1.0

inu_master's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective fast-paced

5.0

shiftycourtney's review against another edition

Go to review page

fast-paced

2.5

theesotericcamel's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Already known for his inventive writing style, Italo Calvino decides to rely on the Tarot as the creative fuel for the collection of stories that occupy this book. In fact, the book is divided into two parts: "The Castle of Crossed Destinies" and "The Tavern of Crossed Destinies." In either part though, the premise remains the same. It is a place where many travellers meet, however their power of speech has been magically taken away. Instead they must rely on a pack of Tarot cards to tell their stories to each other. What is also interesting is that each part uses a different Tarot deck, with the "Castle" using a deck of The Italian Visconti Tarot, and the "Tavern" using the French Mariseilles Tarot. The cards themselves have already been infused with a lot of meaning over the centuries that people have used them. However, Italo Calvino decides to use them in a purely visual manner. That is, ignoring any popular associations the cards have, and simply relying on the images on the cards themselves to propel and inspire the stories. The cards are then laid into patterns and sequences of cards to tell the stories. I think this is especially well done in the "Castle" part of the book. Where the stories interlock into a big spread, and the stories of all the characters can be read by going upwards, downwards, backwards, or forwards along the big spread. This creates a tapestry of stories of sorts, and it is fascinating to see how the stories interweve in a clear pattern. In the second "Tavern" part, he throws away this scheme and opts to jump around the grand spread with less reagard to their placement. The pattern is less rigorous, and so I found the effect to be less impressive. All the same, the collection of stories in this book reminded me a lot of the Canterbury Tales. Perhaps because of the medeival feeling setting, and the similar premise of various travellers telling their stories. However, the use of Tarot cards means that the story is mediated through the cards themselves. Or rather the Narrator's understanding of the meaning of the cards. Although the cards are illustrated in the margins of the book as the story unfolds, it is the Narrator who observes and contextualizes their significance in the story of the traveller laying the cards down. Its a decidedly odd literary effect. Which makes for a unique read!

bennought's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

While the idea for the book is absolutely amazing and incredibly intriguing, I found myself having a hard time getting through it. Maybe it is my unfamiliarity with tarot cards, but the stories felt stilted and sometimes nigh on unreadable. I knew there was some kind of subtext in each of them, but most of the time I was completely missing it or only just getting an inkling. To be perfectly honest, the only sections I actually enjoyed and felt like I understood were the two triple-plotted pieces (Hamlet/Macbeth/Lear and Faust/Parsifal/Oedipus) and his note at the very end.

Calvino remains one of my favorite writers, but I was very disappointed with this book.

_lul_'s review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

1.5

adam_kirsch's review

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? N/A
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

hillybean82's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious reflective fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.0

The language was too flowery for me to get into it. I felt like I was back in high school English class. I did enjoy the concept of characters sharing stories and how it tied into the lore of tarot, but it wasn’t enough to keep me all that engaged.