4.03 AVERAGE

tower_junkee's review

4.75
dark funny reflective tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: N/A
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Can't wait for the sequel 
thauge's profile picture

thauge's review

4.75
dark mysterious sad tense

monsieurbearr's review

4.0

He's done it again - and even better than the first!

I began it just after finishing the first one, and I don't read crime much often. However, Chizmar is an author who is among the likes of King, so of course I was willing to get right back into his twisted world.

It started off pretty slow for me, and I wasn't really enjoying it. But by the end, I could barely put it down and finished off the remaining 50% in a little less than a day.

I am excited for the next in the series and will be purchasing it as soon as it comes out.
dark mysterious reflective slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: No

Setting the Scene: đŸ‡ș🇾 We’re back in Edgewood, Maryland and nearby towns. 
POV: We are following the author of Chasing the Boogeyman in present day (2022), long after the success of their first book. We are also taking a tour through their thoughts, their past, and a town that’s seen better days as they work on their full memoir. Sprinkled throughout is online commentary about the author, their work, and speculations on copycat killings. 
 
Mood Reading Match-Up:
  • Reflective memoirs with fandom levels of information and commentary
  • Excerpts and mini-interviews about copycat killings and a true crime author
  • Fragmented stream of consciousness with snippets of victimology and theories on what motivates a killer
  • Touches on elements of problematic true crime ‘stans’, the downsides of fame, human nature, psychology, family, ambition, anonymity, and legacy. 
 
----
đŸș Growls, Howls, and Tail Wags 🐕
 
🎬 Tale-Telling: The story felt like it was aiming for complex, but to me it came off a corny in its reflection on crime, fame, and the human condition using tired, clichĂ© commentary and pointing out the obvious. For those less familiar with true crime, or crime fiction and thriller tropes, it may work and feel like a straightforward narrative?

🎧 Audio had its hiccups
‘doing the voices’ aren’t exactly this narrator’s forte, but we also had annoying dates, times, and ‘2022’ repeated before every online comment or post. They didn’t make   minor adjustments in the audio production for the epistolary parts.

đŸ€“ Reader’s Role: Part amateur sleuth, part Chizmar fan. The story started off captivating but soon became meandering and interrupting of itself,
and given the ‘big bad’ couldn’t be solved by piecing together the clues
, it just leaves the ‘fan’ role for us to take on. 
 
đŸ‘„ Characters: Center stage is our MC, Richard Chizmar, and his family, so this might feel too insular if you’re not feeling invested in him and his world. The book teetered on the edge of asking for empathy for our MC but felt whiny and “poor ol’ me”, especially against the backdrop of the murders. The character study of our MC felt one dimensional and repetitive in its over-exploration of the same themes and thoughts. If this was an actual memoir, I wouldn't rate it since he’s telling us his story, he should be allowed to do that in his own way. But this was a fiction/metafiction and in that context, our MC came across as vapid, self-centered, and long-winded without ever addressing it or developing further.
 
đŸ—ș Ambiance: The evolution of the town of Edgewood and Chizmar’s home set the backdrop for the story, which was less about atmosphere and more about action—or the contemplation thereof. There was minimal setting of the scene, but I didn’t have the text and audio didn’t come with the photos. I’m not sure if there just weren’t any in this book, or if listeners are missing out. 

đŸ”„ Fuel: A mix of catch-up, commentary, and walks down memory lane that sometimes enhanced the story, but mostly left me craving more as each storyline stalled out. This felt like an unfocused mishmash of multiple drafts that were never given enough investment to take off and it just didn’t work for me. I lost interest in the plot and character arcs. 

🚙 Journey: This is a journey that’s as much about the narrator’s inner world as it is about any external mysteries. There are different kinds of memoirs– ones that are about someone going through something traumatic or unique, and others about someone who is well known and therefore their memoir may contain a lot of “nothing” and stream of consciousness because it is meant to appeal to fans and people who WANT to know them more intimately. This read like the latter.

Random Thoughts
đŸ€“ What worked: The book does a decent job of tying back to its predecessor without making prior knowledge a prerequisite.
đŸ«  What didn’t: It’s an unnecessarily long book, with a disjointed narrative trying to wear many hats—true crime, memoir, philosophical inquiry. The exploration of various elements—past, present, killers, victims—were a mess of thoughts and plot lines. The focus on Chizmar himself could read as introspective but for me read as self-indulgent. Trying to use the same format of the first book (Chasing the Boogeyman) didn’t work here - the storytelling and blurred lines between fact and fiction felt awkward and forced.
 
----
 
Content Heads-Up: Murder. Body horror (decomposition, dismemberment; brief, investigative context). Adoption. Stalking/threatening. 
Rep: White and ambiguous Americans.
 
👀 Format: Everand Audio
 
“Reviews are my musings 💖 powered by puppy snuggles đŸ¶ refined by my AI bookworm bestie ✹”

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
bookmama316's profile picture

bookmama316's review

3.0
dark mysterious slow-paced

jgeppert's review

4.75
dark emotional mysterious tense
dark mysterious tense fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
elauren113's profile picture

elauren113's review

5.0
dark tense fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

amuncy's review

5.0
dark emotional funny fast-paced
ashleynicole1's profile picture

ashleynicole1's review

3.0
dark mysterious medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

I have to be entirely honest, at the conclusion of this book I found myself not really warning another one. I adored the first book and felt like the story had been told. I was eager for the second book to see how the story could expand but it feels as if the author took one successful story and decided to stick with it. 


From a true crime perspective, I really liked how this book explored copycats and the responsibility that falls on authors, reporters and consumers of true crime. It does beg the question of why write more books? But alas, I will most likely pick up book three if I stumble across it.