Take a photo of a barcode or cover
*realizing now that's maybe unfair paraphrasing, it's mostly just about plain conflict and drama - but the thing is, all the horrible stuff that happens in the retreat is so aimless and devoid of sense that it barely registers as conflict to me, at least in the narrative sense of the word, and, well, this is a book. narrative is all there is. i know the absurdity of it all is the point, again i respect that, and i think that on an esthetic level the centering of pain and suffering and horror that transcends any logical end works pretty well, but. again. the "okay so what why should i care these people are just supid and doing stupid shit for no reason" urge is strong with this one.
Graphic: Addiction, Adult/minor relationship, Alcoholism, Animal cruelty, Animal death, Body horror, Body shaming, Bullying, Child abuse, Child death, Chronic illness, Confinement, Cursing, Death, Eating disorder, Emotional abuse, Gore, Hate crime, Homophobia, Mental illness, Misogyny, Pedophilia, Rape, Self harm, Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide, Terminal illness, Torture, Violence, Forced institutionalization, Blood, Excrement, Vomit, Police brutality, Medical content, Kidnapping, Grief, Cannibalism, Medical trauma, Abortion, Suicide attempt, Death of parent, Murder, Pregnancy, Cultural appropriation, Gaslighting, Toxic friendship, Alcohol, Sexual harassment, War, Injury/Injury detail, Classism, Pandemic/Epidemic
Cada uno de los personajes es presentado, seguido por su historia lo que hace que el libro sea una mezcla de novela y relatos cortos.
Chuck Palahniuk lleva la estupidez humana al extremo más extremo de una manera ofensiva y asquerosa que para mi mente enferma hace mucha gracia.
La primera historia, "Guts" (Tripas), tenía fama de hacer que los oyentes se desmayaran cuando Palahniuk la leía en voz alta en las firmas de libros. Lo cual no me extraña. Solo por “Guts” vale la pena leerlo.
One writer spoke about the need to slow down and focus and I really identified with that but this isn't the only way to do that...
For me, this book went from being boring to intriguing to disgusting- in a twisted cyclical dance.
**spoiler**
The funniest and grossest parts to me were-
1. When the writers were yelling but didn't want to be too loud so that passerby would rescue them- they do not want to be rescued. They want to fall deeper into their creativity in this unorthodox way.
2. When the writers decided to maim themselves so that they could spin the story of their willing captivity into being a kidnapping by their host- to make it a good story for the media.
3. The Guts, Swan Song, and Speaking Bitterness chapters. (grossest to me personally)