Reviews

The Deorhord: An Old English Bestiary by Hana Videen

rosy_posy's review

Go to review page

challenging informative mysterious slow-paced

4.5

Really interesting etymological read. I’m surprised to say my favourite bits were the animals that were ordinary or extraordinary - the baffling part felt the weakest to me. Would definitely recommend to anyone interested in language, history of animals or just medieval history generally! Really a weird and wonderful read.

agentbird's review

Go to review page

informative slow-paced

4.0

mayphoenix7992's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative inspiring fast-paced

4.5

4,5⭐️

Amazing book on Old English words. How fascinating to see so many words that have survived into the english we speak today, but also it gives us so many information on how animals were thought of in those days.

I'd recommend it to anyone who likes history, english history or languages.

derekjohnston's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny informative inspiring lighthearted reflective relaxing medium-paced

4.0

tigerkind's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny informative lighthearted reflective medium-paced

4.0

andieevalee's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny informative lighthearted fast-paced

3.5

kjgrievewriter's review

Go to review page

informative relaxing slow-paced

3.0

Intriguing, but ultimately quite bland compared to the first book (Word Hord), much to my surprise as an animal lover. The distinct lack of any references to other historical works - outside of the very few extant Old English texts Videen has chosen to draw from here - is particularly puzzling when she refers to "a lack of writing" on certain subjects and creatures. Yet she somehow manages to open the book with two chapters on the eagle and the spider respectively, but doesn't mention Tolkien anywhere despite Deor Hord's focus on Christianity vs Paganism, and that the two animals are the angels and demons of his mythology. Neither does she address the fact that the villain Shelob literally means female spider (she + Old English 'lob', meaning spider). Similarly, no references to Myrmidons (from Greek 'myrmex', meaning ant) in the ant chapter. It just seems odd, as she references a number of middle English and Latin texts. So maybe Lord of the Rings is a bit modern, but surely it's not a stretch to expect exploration of the classical epics? I just had the unpleasant sensation of feeling like I had more knowledge than the author on certain subjects purely based on how much low hanging fruit was left out.

augustinianseptember's review

Go to review page

informative inspiring medium-paced

5.0

jackievr's review

Go to review page

funny informative medium-paced

4.25

wemilyebb's review

Go to review page

informative lighthearted medium-paced

5.0