Take a photo of a barcode or cover
69 reviews for:
Bunk: The Rise of Hoaxes, Humbug, Plagiarists, Phonies, Post-Facts, and Fake News
Kevin Young
3.34 AVERAGE
69 reviews for:
Bunk: The Rise of Hoaxes, Humbug, Plagiarists, Phonies, Post-Facts, and Fake News
Kevin Young
3.34 AVERAGE
medium-paced
slow-paced
Would be best for someone who already has a good history of hoaxes. This is just discussion and a lot of it will be confusing if you have no background knowledge of famous hoaxes. Or you'll have to do a lot of outside reading while reading this to get a full picture.
Did not finish, but got as far through it as I could before I just gave up. This is such an interesting topic - scams - so why was it soooooo boring. And why was it organised so weirdly - it seemed to jump forward from the 1920s to 1990s in a mere sentence. I don't know if it goes back in time after that, cos you'd hope a book on scams would want to spend some time talking patent medicine. This book feels suspiciously like it started as an article specifically about a few modern scams (mostly the million little pieces guy that is gone on about forever) and other material was dragged out to make it book length.
informative
slow-paced
challenging
informative
slow-paced
challenging
medium-paced
zzzzzzzzzz
i'm sorry what was that i couldn't hear you over my snoring
i'm sorry what was that i couldn't hear you over my snoring
3.75 stars. A lot of mixed feelings here, but reading this was overall a very positive, thought-provoking experience. There is so much research here about the history of hoaxes, and the (not) surprising thing is how much all the fakery is steeped in race and racism. That this book looks at hoaxes through a racial lens really elevates it to the "essential reading" category and provokes a more nuanced discussion of the subject. I think there's something in here that will interest everybody...personally, I enjoyed the later chapters on journalism and literature.
That said, Bunk is not at all a casual read. It caught my eye mostly because of my interest in Kevin Young's work as a poet...also because it's called Bunk, how can you not want to read a book with that kind of title? In any case, I kind of jumped into it on a whim and wasn't altogether prepared for the undertaking. The subject may suggest a fun, pop-psychology leaning, but this book is long and sort of dry and dense as hell. I'm never one to shy away from big books, but a stronger editorial hand would have benefited Bunk - cutting down on less relevant information, structuring it in a less scatterbrained way, and yes (sadly) correcting typos. It's painfully obvious, for instance, that the chapter on Rachel Dolezal was a last-minute addition, as it's stylistically and formally inconsistent with the rest of the book. Dolezal is definitely a vital addition to this conversation, and Young's commentary on her is otherwise on point.
So, tl;dr, I enthusiastically recommend this book for its cultural and historical relevance and intrigue, but be prepared to commit to some heavy lifting.
That said, Bunk is not at all a casual read. It caught my eye mostly because of my interest in Kevin Young's work as a poet...also because it's called Bunk, how can you not want to read a book with that kind of title? In any case, I kind of jumped into it on a whim and wasn't altogether prepared for the undertaking. The subject may suggest a fun, pop-psychology leaning, but this book is long and sort of dry and dense as hell. I'm never one to shy away from big books, but a stronger editorial hand would have benefited Bunk - cutting down on less relevant information, structuring it in a less scatterbrained way, and yes (sadly) correcting typos. It's painfully obvious, for instance, that the chapter on Rachel Dolezal was a last-minute addition, as it's stylistically and formally inconsistent with the rest of the book. Dolezal is definitely a vital addition to this conversation, and Young's commentary on her is otherwise on point.
So, tl;dr, I enthusiastically recommend this book for its cultural and historical relevance and intrigue, but be prepared to commit to some heavy lifting.
informative
slow-paced