3.53 AVERAGE

challenging dark emotional reflective sad medium-paced
challenging slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Loveable characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
dark emotional slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Good metaphors - but sometimes convoluted.

The dynamic between her and her mother and how it affected her was interesting to read. Everything else wasn't for me.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
adventurous challenging dark emotional funny informative mysterious reflective sad tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Interestingly this stands out to me more than anything as an original and imperfect read. Jelinek writes in such a lyrical and conversational manner it is breathtaking, spellbinding at times. But her metaphors and abstraction do skew a tad too much at points forcing the meaning to be lost or grappled with, diluting its power. 

“No artist tolerates anything incomplete or half baked in his work”

“A world opens up to HER… the pustules with which the world can be joined together release an equally tiny world of music.”

“Health-how disgusting. Health is the transfiguration of the status quo… well, health always sides with the victors; the weak fall away”

I could spend hours typing out quotes I highlighted or finding ones I couldn’t highlight because I didn’t have a pen with me and fell ill about leaving behind as I turned the page on my commute. 

It is such a considered and harrowing piece of work that doesn’t shy away from its horror. And even in rereading lines from the earlier half of the book the foreshadowing and inevitability of Erika’s fate - deemed not by her but by Klemmer’s hidden nature of cruelty and narcissism only rocks me more. 

I held back from reading the final few pages because I wanted clarification on what the characters were thinking to compare to the later scenes of the film and was almost scared to be proven right but also scared to be proven wrong. 

The piano teacher is about abuse. It is about art as shelter and romance as a “Trojan horse.” It is characterised by Erika, whose earnest and repressed longing for mutuality and dictated tenderness, after years of parental imprisonment and arrested development, is met with misunderstanding, cowardice, unwarranted humiliation and abuse. 

“If you weren’t a victim, you couldn’t become one.” 



Both book and film have taken over my entire January and though it wasn’t exactly “fun” or entertaining to engage with and pick apart, it was necessary.

korrick's review

4.0

Show, not tell. The eternal plaint of literature. Do not tell us of the parade; bleed our ears to the beat of cacophony. Do not list out the throes of death; pierce our lungs and tie them up behind our backs. Do not speak of emotions with a single word; grip our hearts and plunge them into the carefully calibrated abyss.

Well, alright. Let me give that a try.

People say, oh, the joys of music! People sigh, oh, the mystic devotion of motherhood! People scream, oh, the sacrilegious desensitization of modern society! People mutter, oh, the banal unknowns of sexual proclivity. People think, oh, the place for man, and the place for woman.

Align yourself in pursuit of Art, snip and stretch and crack the lazy spine into proper positioning till you soar high, high above the masses in your ability to listen, replicate, understand. Seek meaning in every pain and pain in every meaning, and you will begin to perceive the discontent that drove the masters, those divinities so much better than the uncouth animals slobbering over the music they left behind. Throw your all into it, gild and grate your sanity into perfect form, and laugh at those whose pitiful minds cannot handle the wondrous Truth. Never mind the banalities of evil that crop up in the beginning, those will soon recede before the tide of the Greater Things in Life. In awareness, at least.

There is a singular feeling to be found in those who know their mother well, well enough to register their status as a financial investment in her eyes. Step to the beat, clap to the rhythm, and she will assume you functional; a working appliance does not require attention. Break from the track, run around on newfound legs and divest yourself in dividends undesirable to the maternal streak, and watch as the furious threats and emotional gutting chases after the errant child, determined to slap and beat and bunch it back into shape. How embarrassing! It seems, despite all that she has given it in the form of monetary stimulation and business schedule counseling and a dash of 'Iloveyous' when a debt needs to be filled, it has not yet been housebroken. Back to the pruning it goes, fill its head with thoughts of homelessness and disgrace, then place a sack of cash at the end of the track. Who wouldn't do anything for money? Those who value healthy emotional rapport over commercial value? Ha ha, nonsense! Mommie knows best.

Society isn't desensitized. The social construct is simply content with its vague descriptions of horrors in a meaningless void of sound and fury, its fuzzy images that fetishize the physical antagonist, its panderings at atrocious thrills that spawn emulation rather than disgust. Because as soon as a book like this comes along that portrays verbal abuse, emotional manipulation, casual rape, and so many more of the dregs in full relief, in lurid detail lit not by candlelight but a spotlight seeking out the drippings and punctures of every orifice, many shy away. Show, not tell, remember? Careful that you don't eat your words in panicked offense. No one said you were allowed to comfortably watch from the fully furnished box, high up in the usual lofty assuredness of the Reader-God, sanitized and sanctified by virtue of distance. No one said you weren't going to participate.

That includes the sex, and the sexual build up, and the sexual reasoning, and the sexual genders, and the sexual expectations of said genders, and the sexual expectations of who controls whom, and for how long, and what goes where, and how the violence is to be rendered, and the methods by which the violations are to be conducted, and what gets mixed up in the mind and sludges itself down into the genitals, and the pain. Above all, the pain. Who plays, whom they play, and how.

Human being, so confident in your non-objectified status, so content in the unexamined life, so ignorant of your inner mechanisms where bone runs to blood and nurture squares off with nature on the battlefield of desire, rampant where limits are a thing unknown for all the audience may shrill and bleat. Are you sure?

I was curious because I'd seen the movie. I can see why Jelinek's writing is well-regarded, but every last character is repellent.

3.8

There's some great writing here. Requires a re-read.

Ugh. Maybe something was lost in the translation. This book just felt really uneven to me. It was a jumble of unnecessary metaphors, and too much description, and referring to the lead character sometimes by her first name, sometimes her last, and sometimes just an initial made no sense to me. To be perfectly honest, I skimmed through large chunks of this, and it still felt interminable. Next time I need to give up once I realize I hate what I'm reading. Life is too short for bad literature.
jazzylemon's profile picture

jazzylemon's review

3.0

This is the story of a piano teacher in her mid-late 30s who has lived her life in the shadow of her over-bearing mother. She is violent, self-harming, and has extreme latent sexual fantasies. She is attracted to one of her charming young students in his early 20s who exhibits a desire for her as well.

Not for prudes, this book has graphic and deviant sexual text.