3.69 AVERAGE


I just did not "get" this book.

The last quarter of act 2, and the whole of act 3 were great. The writing was pretty incoherent at times but I still enjoyed it a lot.
challenging dark mysterious tense fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Tio ten read.

Never in my life did I think I'd enjoy entire chapters about bugs, sand and more sand.

This was a great break from my only exposure to Japanese literature (Murakami) and it was a fantastic book. Full review to come. First I need to shake off some sand.

Image result for confused screaming

Image result for sand is coarse

Claustrophobic and seething sexuality.
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: No

This book was weird... just weird. Very existential. I would describe the book to others and found myself giving the blandest summary of the book possible... because honestly, not a lot happens. This book is very introspective and because of that, it's probably not universally appealing. I liked it, but I'm not sure what I got out of it. The importance of work, probably... I don't know.

A critique of masculine scientific rationality. While the novel contains misogynistic attitudes and extremely disturbing scenes (CW), it also serves as a penetrating exposition of masculine entitlement and the limitations of purely rational thought that dissects/exposes rather than endorses the protagonist's warped worldview. Also recommend watching the 1964 film adaptation after reading if you can stomach the content.
dark emotional reflective medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
emotional reflective tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes