Grant Morrison's best work? Even better than 'The Invisibles?' Not sure, but it's a phenomenal exploration of Batman and his villains.

The more you read it the better it gets. I love everything in this, not a single complaint.
(well apart wishing the Joker was even more gayer, but alas)

dave mckeans insane art was the best choice to compliment grants insane writing what a fucking collab
challenging dark mysterious reflective tense fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

A true masterpiece. It really captures the spirit of Arkham Asylum and is a love letter to Batman and Joker’s dynamic together. Truly a read that lost me a bit of sanity, but seeing as some of this influenced the Arkham series (especially Asylum) that lost sanity was worth it in order to see the book’s true meaning.

This is probably one of the most confusing and out there Batman graphic novels that I've read but I really like how creepy and off-the-wall it is. There's a reason it's considered one of the Batman must-read comics. The story goes back and forth between Amadeus Arkham establishing Arkham Asylum (where most of Gotham's more interesting villians will be incarcerated) and Batman being forced to enter the Asylum years later after Joker has taken control. The madness inherent in Amadeus' family was fascinating to see unravel and I loved getting the history behind the classic Gotham institution. The Joker in this story is disturbingly sexual and it was almost uncomfortable to see his interactions yet absolutely fascinating. Batman must run a gauntlet through classic Batman villains to get control of Arkham once again and as is common for Grant Morrison, the symbolism and small details mean that it's one that really needs to be read more than once. This was the second time I've read this and I still don't think I fully understand it all. Dave McKean is as brilliant in his artwork as always so if you like creepy, subtle explorations of madness and the darker sides of humanity, it's a good one!
challenging dark tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: No

Very artistic and well drawn. An absolutely beautiful book. But hard to read physically. The story is interesting enough. Nothing really spectacular from my perspective. Then again I'm not a big Batman comic fan. But it was very dark and at times poetic... kinda. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
adventurous dark mysterious tense fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Loveable characters: Yes
adventurous dark tense

Not knowing much about Batman comics generally, I hadn't heard of Arkham Asylum before. When I saw it on the shelf in the library, its look intrigued me, so I grabbed it and checked it out. Having spent some time with it now, I hesitate--as I think anyone should--to say something like "I loved Arkham Asylum!" To love this book would almost be like admitting lunacy or depravity, because it's a nightmarish story that I find easy to admire, but hard to "like."

Most of the time when I read a 1980s/1990s graphic novel that is acclaimed and revered, I am disappointed (yes, I'm including Frank Miller, Alan Moore, and Neil Gaiman). It usually seems that the writer is striving for more depth and substance than he is capable of, or trying to show off some amount of literariness that annoys rather than impresses me. And the art that goes with these stories rarely interests me. With Arkham Asylum, however, I felt that Grant Morrison got a little closer to realizing what's possible in the graphic novel. His ideas and imagery sometimes veer into the "please, could this be any more heavy-handed" territory--but he also keeps a lot of big ideas and themes afloat through the story. Somehow, even with the occasional pretentiousness, he manages to be more compelling than Miller, Moore, or Gaiman. I appreciated the general tone and direction of his story.

There were problems, of course. In particular, I felt that the story would have been more compelling had any of the characters been closer to my reality. For example, Arkham's descent into madness is kept at a great distance from my own questions and fears about slipping into madness. Instead of drawing out my fears, Morrison makes Arkham into a caricature of "insane doctor," with a trajectory that doesn't match anything in my real experience. Batman is a cold, distant figure as well, which doesn't help bring me into his story. I think Arkham Asylum would have been more powerful if it had presented some kind of mirror of the reader's reality.

I rarely find graphic novel artwork that I love, but Dave McKean's work on Arkham Asylum is some of the most interesting I've ever seen. It reminds me of another favorite of mine, Bill Sienkiewicz. The colors, the very abstract imagery, the interesting layout of panels . . . it's all perfect for this story, and I want to see more of this art style. It was interesting to read the script in the back of this volume and see all the ways that McKean brought out the bleakness of the story. There are a number of points where Morrison envisioned more detail that would have made the story slightly more conventional, but McKean repeatedly made it as opaque and abstract and dark as he could.

The redemptive ending, after all the darkness, was a beautiful surprise. Without that, I wouldn't be able to admire the book nearly so much.

As I said, it's not a book I could say I love, but it's a graphic novel that I admire in many ways. I'd like to find more graphic novels that are as satisfyingly complex and intriguing, visually and story-wise.

dark mysterious tense fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character

Expand filter menu Content Warnings