You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Take a photo of a barcode or cover
3.33 AVERAGE
3.33 AVERAGE
Bitterly funny and over-the-top, this is very broad Dickens in a short package. He always makes me tear up because I'm a sentimental bozo.
Not the best Dickens, but one of the best of his characters--Mrs. Sparsit is simply perfect.
Not the best Dickens, but one of the best of his characters--Mrs. Sparsit is simply perfect.
After reading this book, I am still not a fan of Dickens. Oh, the perils of required reading.
I FINALLY FINISHED THIS YESSSSSS.
Hard Times was definitely the best of the classics I've read so far. It was a little more stratghtforward and I actually found myself enjoying the events in the story at times.
But I'm so glad I finished it OMG
Hard Times was definitely the best of the classics I've read so far. It was a little more stratghtforward and I actually found myself enjoying the events in the story at times.
But I'm so glad I finished it OMG
Oh, Dickens. What am I going to do with you?
It was a well crafted book from start to finish, full of subtle irony. In fact, I almost missed the irony of the entire ending. The characters were beautiful, diverse, perplexing, infuriating, and dynamic.
Even though some may call it a bleak book, I really enjoyed it. One of the themes Dickens explores, put into simple terms is Fact vs. Fiction. The leading figures in the industrial Coketown are all about fact, figure, and reason. In a sense, they are empiricists. One of these men (Gradgrind) endeavors to raise his two oldest children in a strict, rigid environment, suppressing all emotion and imagination. As Tom and Louisa become adults, their lives fall apart in two very different ways.
Dickens doesn't miss the opportunity to shed light on the social issues at hand. The working class people, although misjudged and mistreated, are usually the most sensible ones, even for lack of proper education.
The female characters in this book were fantastic!
I particularly liked the character of Louisa, who plays a prominent role in the book. She has been raised to suppress her emotions. She learns how to emulate the machine her father wants her to be, but she had to fight her inner spirit for years in order to do it. It leaves her empty and depressed, deciding that life is short and meaningless. She is described as a philosopher and deep thinker, remarkably full of self-possession.
Cecelia Jupe was also striking although she played a much smaller role. In contrast to Louisa's excellence at education, Sissy seems to stumble in her education because of her common sense and compassionate, simple mind. She is idealistic and as she grows older, instead of becoming disillusioned by the world she is moved with compassion to help people. There is a remarkable scene where she confronts a worldly, knowledgeable, man of rank and he is intimidated by her.
And then there is Rachael. She is the quiet, loyal, compassionate companion to the man she can never marry. She makes sacrifices for him without complaining and defends him when he is falsely accused.
None of these women really get what they want. But they all persevered and I was not left with the impression that they were unhappy. (In fact, it is pretty clearly stated that Sissy is happy).
It is also interesting to note that many of the characters find themselves in circumstances they can't change. Stephen has a wife who is a burden to him. Rachael cannot marry the man she loves. Louisa ends up in a loveless marriage. Sissy's father abandons her. And yet it seems like the one character who had the opportunity to better himself, leave his childhood behind, and achieve something is the one who falls the most.
It was a well crafted book from start to finish, full of subtle irony. In fact, I almost missed the irony of the entire ending. The characters were beautiful, diverse, perplexing, infuriating, and dynamic.
Even though some may call it a bleak book, I really enjoyed it. One of the themes Dickens explores, put into simple terms is Fact vs. Fiction. The leading figures in the industrial Coketown are all about fact, figure, and reason. In a sense, they are empiricists. One of these men (Gradgrind) endeavors to raise his two oldest children in a strict, rigid environment, suppressing all emotion and imagination. As Tom and Louisa become adults, their lives fall apart in two very different ways.
Dickens doesn't miss the opportunity to shed light on the social issues at hand. The working class people, although misjudged and mistreated, are usually the most sensible ones, even for lack of proper education.
The female characters in this book were fantastic!
I particularly liked the character of Louisa, who plays a prominent role in the book. She has been raised to suppress her emotions. She learns how to emulate the machine her father wants her to be, but she had to fight her inner spirit for years in order to do it. It leaves her empty and depressed, deciding that life is short and meaningless. She is described as a philosopher and deep thinker, remarkably full of self-possession.
Cecelia Jupe was also striking although she played a much smaller role. In contrast to Louisa's excellence at education, Sissy seems to stumble in her education because of her common sense and compassionate, simple mind. She is idealistic and as she grows older, instead of becoming disillusioned by the world she is moved with compassion to help people. There is a remarkable scene where she confronts a worldly, knowledgeable, man of rank and he is intimidated by her.
And then there is Rachael. She is the quiet, loyal, compassionate companion to the man she can never marry. She makes sacrifices for him without complaining and defends him when he is falsely accused.
None of these women really get what they want. But they all persevered and I was not left with the impression that they were unhappy. (In fact, it is pretty clearly stated that Sissy is happy).
It is also interesting to note that many of the characters find themselves in circumstances they can't change. Stephen has a wife who is a burden to him. Rachael cannot marry the man she loves. Louisa ends up in a loveless marriage. Sissy's father abandons her. And yet it seems like the one character who had the opportunity to better himself, leave his childhood behind, and achieve something is the one who falls the most.
3.5 stars. There were bits I absolutely loved, but I know Dickens can do better than this.
I didn't think I would like it, but it was surprisingly enjoyable. Dickens was really unsubtle in his opinions but I think it worked well for the novel. The only thing missing from this story and the industrial Coketown is the extreme plight of the working class in the urban landscape.
this is what victorian people had to explain utilitarianism because they didn't have the good place on netflix
Dickens will probably never be my favourite writer, but this book did hold some great aspects and it was relatively easy to get through (compared to say, oliver twist, which i dragged through last year).
I enjoyed reading this book but I definitely didn't love it. Hard Times provided an almost dystopian look at what would happen if people managed to purge themselves of emotion.