722 reviews for:

Four Past Midnight

Stephen King

3.8 AVERAGE


3.5

This is a generous 3

I enjoyed this collection of four novellas, but they were not as scary as some of his stories.

Read for the 2015 Reading Challenge: A book that scares you.



The Langoliers.



“The Langoliers” is probably my favourite story of the book. I loved his interpretation of time, and time travel and everything. As a Doctor Who fan, I kept making connections between the book and the TV series,

like the place they were stuck in related to a pocket universe, or the Langoliers connected to either the Vashta Nerada or the Reapers from “Father’s Day”
yet it was nothing like it. So, yes, that was the first element of the story that I loved.


The second one would be the characters. Especially Nick Hopewell. He was by far my favourite character in the entire story. I’m pretty sure I fell in love with him

despite his very, very, very sad ending. I didn’t even notice I was crying until I wiped the tears off my face
. Brian was okay, so were Albert and Bethany. Laurel was interesting, in a way, and Dinah… Well, I think she was one of the most interesting characters of the book. Her blindness combined with her age… I mean, I’m used to children being the more observant ones in fiction, and she was very observant despite her blindness. I think it was her lack of sight that made her more observant. She was the one who noticed danger was coming before anybody else.
To be honest, I was expecting her to die. I don’t know why, but I thought “If anyone will kill a blind little girl in a book, it’s going to be Stephen King. I wasn’t wrong.
Jenkins was probably one of the smartest guys in that plane, even though I pretty much figured things out before him, but that did not make me enjoy the story any less. In fact, it just heightened my stress and fear for the characters.
I was practically yelling at them to fall asleep before they went through the time rip long before he remembered it
And that drunk guy that slept through most of the story made me laugh because, really? He could sleep through the Apocalypse and wake up and be like “Hey, are we in Boston yet?” I’m pretty sure I forgot to mention some of the characters in there, but it was because they didn’t exactly participate much, or did stupid things
like freeing Toomy. I mean, really? The guy’s got mental problems and could kill anyone just to get to Boston, and you free him simply because you think he’s asleep? What’s up with that?


Toomy deserves his own paragraph because yes. He’s not my favourite character of the book. In fact, I’d say he’s the one I disliked the most. But he still deserves his own paragraph, albeit it will probably be rather short. He was interesting, from a psychological point of view, and I can’t exactly blame him for what he was — I suppose many people would turn out the way he did if they lived through the same troubled childhood he had.

I do think he got what he deserved, in the end. One does not simply stab blind little girls and run off. Nuh huh. Then again, Dinah got her revenge by sacrificing him to the Langoliers, so she’s not exactly a saint either. Kids. They get more and more twisted these days.


The ending was brilliant. I was scared the entire way, and pretty much expected everyone to die, to be honest. I mean, it’s Stephen King. What was I supposed to expect? I’d definitely recommend it, to anyone, really.

I kept trying to imagine ways things would’ve happened differently, though. Like Nick not dying. Especially Nick not dying.
I’ll never view planes differently again, though. Especially after what happens in the very first chapter — and no, I’m not talking about the whole time-travel thing.
It’s about the leak. Next time I’ll get on a plane, I’ll be remembering you. Damn you, King.
If I had to rate this story on its own, I’d give it five out of five stars — yes, that much — because I absolutely loved it.



Secret Window, Secret Garden.



“Secret Window, Secret Garden” is fascinating. I already knew who John Shooter was halfway through the book,
the incredible amount of “coincidences” gave it away, and since I love all those psychological thrillers, I considered the possibility that Mort and Shooter might be the same person — and I was right —
yet that didn’t make it any less exciting. For some reason I kept expecting some sort of fantastic element, something that would most definitely not be realistic. If you’re expecting that too, you won’t be disappointed.
I certainly wasn’t expecting Shooter to have become some sort of ghost. A tulpa, actually, according to Supernatural. He thought of Shooter so much, focused on him for so much, he actually became real… That’s creepy. And the note Amy received just made it worse, to be honest.

Just like with “The Langoliers”, this story was packed with suspense, and kept me wanting to keep reading, just to find out the truth. I found it a little harder to read than the first story, though, but that doesn’t mean I enjoyed it less. I like the idea of the writer that has to face “his worse nightmare”

and that, in the end, he’s just punishing himself for that one story he stole and used to start his professional career. I think that’s the thing I love the most about this book. Justice that manifests through self-punishment, because his wrongs were never righted. Well, now they certainly are
.


The interactions between the characters were well-done. I like how the divorce is handled in it, too. There are too many divorces out there that don’t end well, and these are the ones that are often depicted in stories. So we fail to remember that there are divorces that don’t necessarily end horribly, and you can still be on good terms with the other, despite some obvious tensions that will arise, like pretty much every moment where Amy, Mort and Ted are together.


And don’t get me started on the names. Let’s just start with Mort’s, okay? Mort, in French, means death. Ever since I saw what his nickname was, I had a feeling he would die — else he wouldn’t have been named that way. The names of characters in fiction don’t always mean anything related to the story, but in this case, it definitely did. Else, why “Mort”, which turns out to be death in another language? Yes, this definitely creeped me out, and I wasn’t surprised by his death at the end, even though I didn’t really expect him to die.


The entire story made me think of the film The Uninvited, which, granted, came out in 2009 (and is the remake of a film released in 2003). The film and the story share some central themes, like jealousy and, most importantly, a mental illness that ends with many deaths. If you haven’t seen the film, sorry for the spoiler.


This story was brilliant, which is why I’ll give it four stars out of five. Why not the five? I suppose because, even though I liked it very much, it wasn’t exactly what I was expecting — but then again, what I was expecting was very weird. That and, well, I found it too predictable for me, although it might not be for others. Nevertheless, it’s still a very good story, and I recommend it to people who like Stephen King’s books, or simply fans of thriller stories

especially psychological thrillers
.



The Library Policeman.



I laughed with the very first sentence of “The Library Policeman”. Stephen King writes very funny first sentences. I think I’ve never laughed so much at the start of anyone’s books. In fact, I’ve laughed a lot with this story, perhaps more than with “Secret Window, Secret Garden”. Setting the comic aspect of this story aside, I don’t think I’ll ever view Libraries in the same way ever again. Which is actually quite horrible for me, because I love books, and libraries. Damn you, Stephen King.


I liked many things about it. One, the characters are perfectly ordinary. I mean, in “The Langoliers”, you had some special people

Nick, for starters. And then there’s Toomy, with his mental problems, and the blind little girl that can sense more than she should be able to. Here, the characters are so ordinary, they even have completely unextraordinary problems, like alcoholism
, but here, you have some very ordinary ones that are thrust into a very extraordinary situation — and I don’t mean that in a good way. So that’s something pretty important to me. Besides, they’re not famous, like the main character in “Secret Window, Secret Garden”. They’re just, you know, there. Like so many of us. And I like a good anti-hero as much as the next person — if the next person likes anti-heroes.


The other thing I absolutely loved about it was its creepiness. That might sound strange, but I was stressed out — hell, I was afraid during the entire story, wanting to see how it ended.

If you like a happy ending, you won’t be disappointed. Well, at least I see it as a happy ending. And this is rather weird, considering it’s a Stephen King book. I mean Christine’s happy ending was fucked up, and Misery did not exactly have a happy ending in my mind. “The Langoliers” does not have a happy ending for me — yes, because of Nick; no, I’m still not over it — and “Secret Window, Secret Garden” does not exactly qualify as a “happy ending” for me. I mean, the guy died, for fuck’s sake. Even if I’d been expecting it, it’s not exactly “happy”. In “The Library Policeman”, sure, Dave dies, but Sam and Naomi live, and they get together and are happy and whatnot. This didn’t happen in other books or stories I’ve read by Stephen King. Not at all.
I was on the edge of my seat most of the time, and that bloody policeman scared me enough. Now, I’ll be sure never to bring books back late at my school’s library, even if they don’t send policemen after you. But then again, rational thinking isn’t exactly helpful when you’re reading a Stephen King book.
Considering the fact that Ardelia wasn’t even human, I’d say rational thinking is the complete opposite of helpful.


This story was amazing. I’d give it five stars out of five, because it’s bloody brilliant. It’s certainly my second-favourite story in this entire book — almost the first, almost — and probably the scariest one in it. I’m writing his review (‘cos I wrote them as I finished each story), and I still feel that uneasy feeling in my stomach. I’d definitely recommend it if you like this sort of thing. I promise you one thing, though: you’ll never see a Library in the same way ever again.



The Sun Dog.



“The Sun Dog” was my least favourite story out of the four. I don’t know why, but I just couldn’t read it like the other ones: I had to make a lot of pauses and practically force myself to read again — after all, I still have 20 books to read for the Reading Challenge before the year ends. The story is good, the characters are well-done, and the idea is brilliant. I suppose I just didn’t like the way it was carried out.


Sure, I could recognise Stephen King’s writing in any sentence, and I think that’s what made it rather enjoyable, but still. I found it was too descriptive at times, or focused on parts of the story that, to me, were rather uninteresting. I did like the ending, though. And I like that we’re able to see the contrast between the beginning of the book and the end.


I wouldn’t necessarily recommend this story, but if you want to read it, knock yourself out. If you enjoyed it, good for you. I’m glad somebody else liked it, even if it wasn’t me. Because it wasn’t necessarily a bad story, I’d give this three stars out of five.


Langoliers was definitely my favorite of the collection, it's so strong. I hope that gets a fun updated adaptation sometime soon because I feel like filmmaking has caught up to make that story possible. I also just adore the interlude/introductions by King. There's something very cozy and a bit Rod Serling-ish about King setting up his own stories for you.

I’m just a girl, reading through found owned books, chasing the high of reading-The-Shining-for-the-first-time.

‘Bout to give up, to be honest.

Grouping this with “It,” and other wastes of time.

I thoroughly enjoyed every single one of these!

I would definitely recommend this along with Different Seasons for anyone who is starting of with Stephen King. This collection is definitely all horror, but covers a variety of other genres as well (sci-fi, paranormal etc). The stories were all quite creepy especially book #4 The Sundog, which made something as innocuous as a camera disturbing. I also enjoyed hearing about familiar characters and happenings from other stories that were referenced in here (The Dark Half, Needful Things, Cujo) and also seeing a familiar type of villain in The Library Policeman (It, The Dark Tower).

Some really great stories from King. Well, three great stories and one horrible one. I recommend skipping "The Library Policeman," which starts from a boring and not-very-scary premise and digs itself into a hole trying to explain why the characters are motivated to do what they do. And in which (spoiler alert!) the rape of a child is used as a convenient plot twist.

3.5

I really like the stories The Langoliers as I love the classic The Mist, Library Policeman was also creepy to me. Secret Window, Secret Garden was okay. And the last story wasn’t the best to me.

Not my favourite collection but still great and well-written!

The Langoliers - 3 stars
Secret Window, Secret Garden - 4 stars (cw pet violence)
The Library Policeman - 4 stars (cw molestation on page)
The Sun Dog - 3 stars (Cujo spoilers included, and this is the 2nd installment in a loose Castle Rock trilogy)

Rounding down to 3 overall because I had issues with the writing for various reasons in all stories, with the exception of SWSG whose downfall was only being extremely dated. (There is also some sexism/misogyny involved but the perspective allows it to feel like a reflection of the character rather than the writer, which I found more tolerable.) But those are pretty normal issues for SK, especially in his older works, and actually I had a pretty great time reading all of these. They're a great length, the concepts are really intriguing, the level of suspense and pacing is handled so well in all but The Langoliers. This a really consistent collection. I'd probably recommend it to people who've read SK's most popular works and aren't sure where to start with his lesser known stuff, as long as you go in knowing there are (as usual) some unsavory details.