Scan barcode
wellreadandhalfdead's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Graphic: Torture, Violence, and Blood
Moderate: Sexual content
booksdogsandcoffee's review against another edition
5.0
Graphic: Violence, Blood, Vomit, Murder, and Gaslighting
Moderate: Sexual content and Grief
mtorma13's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Moderate: Gore, Violence, and Blood
Minor: Child abuse and Child death
not_another_ana's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.25
"The girl, the King..." I breathed. The Nightmare's voice burned through my mind. And the monster they became.
The city of Blunder is cursed. Not only is it surrounded by a mist that drives people mad, but its inhabitants also have to contend with "the fever", an ailment that either kills the child that contracts it or bestows upon them magic. However, all magic has a price, and anyone who survives this is bound to "degenerate" in violent or fatal ways. For this reason, all magic is forbidden, except for the use of these magic cards (in possession of the nobles) that keep the user safe from degeneration, and any survivor of the fever must be executed.
Elspeth Spindle survived this illness and managed to hide this fact from the public. She now lives a mostly normal life and is seemingly powerless, except for the Nightmare, a shadowy monster that lives in her head and lends her his strength in times of need. One day she runs into the king's nephew and, when her secret partially gets out, is dragged into a mission that could potentially cure her as long as she manages to collect all the magic cards before the solstice. But magic always comes with a price and the degeneration might find her first.
Is this book good? Debatable. Did it keep me reading? Yes, I will give it that. The action in this is very compelling and something is always happening, forcing the reader to keep turning the pages. At the same time it's a plot that is both contained and empty. If I had to describe this book in one word, I would say it's serviceable, it knows exactly what it is and executes it in a sufficient way. The plot is a vehicle for the romance so a lot of world building and interesting ideas get sidelined in favor of the relationship between Elspeth and Ravyn. This brings me to my first point: everyone's names were soooo bad, I wrote "unmoanable" in my notes. Is this a petty grievance? Yes, but it did bother me.
Now to my biggest gripe: the world building. As I mentioned before, the author didn't put any care into weaving the setting of this book. I have no idea what Blunder looked like or its geography, somehow they were able to quickly travel from the King's castle to any other place on the map by riding a horse really fast. It seems like the setting is vaguely medieval, at least culturally, yet Elspeth (the oldest daughter of a noble) walks alone in the middle of the night, stays at her suitor's estate without any sort of maid or chaperone, and spends time alone with men who aren't related to her, with no damage to her honor. We see almost nothing of the average citizen's experience, it's all from the noble's point of view, and this makes the environment feel fake like a Hollywood set. I also find it odd that in a place with magic and superstition there doesn't seem to be any kind of organized religion around either the providence cards or the spirit of the woods.
The romance was fine, a bit instalove-y but not the worst thing I've come across. Ravyn is a bit of a generic dark haired love interest, but I did like their interactions and at least they had something in common.
Was the prose flat? Yes. Did the rhymes suck? Absolutely. Is the author quite heavy handed with what she's trying to say? Correct. And yet I read this whole thing in like a week, and I just started reading book two, so she won and I'm a fool.
Graphic: Body horror and Blood
Moderate: Child death
neffypants's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Graphic: Violence and Blood
payton_layne's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
Graphic: Violence and Blood
Moderate: Death and Murder
Minor: Sexual content
gracemcbee's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
Graphic: Death, Gore, Violence, Blood, and Injury/Injury detail
amy14's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Graphic: Child death, Death, Sexual content, Blood, Death of parent, and Abandonment
alba_1994's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
Graphic: Violence and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Child abuse, Child death, Death, Emotional abuse, Genocide, Sexual content, Blood, Death of parent, and Murder
abbyweber's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Child death, Death, Mental illness, Forced institutionalization, and Blood
Moderate: Sexual content