Reviews

The Dream of the Celt by Mario Vargas Llosa

amelie5m's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark informative sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

teastainsonthepiano's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional informative reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? N/A
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.75

gorskaya's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Потрясающий роман. Путь от идеалиста, юного искателя приключений к человеку, в тюрьме ожидающего помилования или казни за государственную измену. Столько этических вопросов! Интересно, что бы сказал Кейсмент, живи он в наши дни.

melanie_reads's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Eh ... got a lot of historical information regarding Casement's work in the Congo, Brazil and Ireland. However, it was very uneven in that the narrative and historical simply didn't match well from the reader's perspective.

oisin175's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Roger Casement led an interesting life. He traveled the Congo with experienced and famous explorers. He was a Diplomat for Britain and worked on several reports detailing the human rights abuses of colonial powers in rubber plantations. He drew a connection between the plight of the colonized he reported on with the plight of the Irish. During World War I he traveled to Germany in an attempt to gain an allegiance that would help Ireland gain its independence. Despite his work for a free Ireland, he was largely ignored for decades because he was gay.

Despite the large amount of interesting information on Casement's life, this book fails to bring about much excitement. It's well written, though it acts as more of a fictionalized biography. It's written in the second person, though large sections read like a normal biography. This book seems to suffer from a lack of ambition. It's as if the author decided that Casement's life was so interesting he could spend a third of the book dealing with the final few days of Casement's life (which really works to provide information about his life/beliefs that weren't apparent otherwise, kind of like backstory). He then devoted the rest of the book to writing a straight forward biography with digressions into Casement's thoughts/ailments. It felt as thought the author wanted to write a fictional account of Casement's life but was worried about the book being inaccurate at the same time.

All in all, it is a decent book, though it isn't anything special or exciting. Based on the subject, the lack of interest in the reader is a pretty big disappointment.

wittenbergman's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous informative medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5

blackoxford's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Curb Your Enthusiasm

Roger Casement had consistently disappointing experience with modern institutions. His work as a shipping clerk in a private firm in Liverpool had no adventure. His time as an adventurer in the Congo for the Belgian monarch lacked humanity. His diplomatic efforts as part of the British government on behalf of humanity had little practical success. And his association with the ultimately successful 1916 Easter Uprising in Ireland led to his conviction for treason against his country and death by hanging. If he had survived into the Republic, I’m confident he would have found that Eire didn’t meet his expectations either. And incidentally he was gay, which did him little good among many institutions with which he had yet to have contact.

One might accurately call Casement a serial idealist. He moved from one idealistic fantasy to another throughout his life, seeking that true cause within an organization composed of other similarly dedicated true believers. When he failed to find the right ideal or a sufficiently sympathetic organization, he doubled the stakes, plunging into more and more radical causes until he ended up conspiring with Germany to free his native Ireland from British rule. He was, in short, somewhat of a social menace.

There are numerous poems, ballads, and mythical stories about Casement as an Irish national hero. Brian Inglis wrote his biography in 1973; this was republished 20 years later, and then again in 2002. Casement has been the subject of international television documentaries, a stage play, another biographical novel contemporaneous with that of Vargas Llosa, a graphic novel, as well as numerous articles, government reports and literary references. Casement’s memoirs, journals and diaries have been published and extensively analyzed in the popular and academic press. He is even the theme of an American country rock song. The man, in other words, has been well studied.

Therefore it seems to me odd that Vargas Llosa would choose Casement as the subject of this biographical novel. At times it is unclear if Vargas Llosa had decided definitively either to write a biography or a novel. He ends up providing immense amounts of historical detail but very little about what’s going on in Casement’s head, except his progressive disillusion with the way the world had been organized in his absence. There are no innovative insights, no obvious literary themes, no controversial interpretations as there are in his other biographical novel The War of the End of the World. Other than as a somewhat strident cautionary tale for today’s young idealists, therefore, I don’t see the point.

punt11's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark informative slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.25

doireann_ni_chaoimh's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? N/A
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

1.0

I only gave it one star because it made me want to read other books about Roger Casement and the time period. It didn’t make me want to read this book itself. 

It felt like the writer was too afraid to lean into the fictional element of the book, or the factual, so you just kind of get the worst of both. I never connected with Casement’s character as written and I felt the subject matter just wasn’t covered in a meaningful way at all. The whole way through, it felt like a slog so I wasn’t even bothered about getting to the end.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

orestisgeo's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

"I say that Roger Casement
Did what he had to do
He died upon the gallows
But that is nothing new"

- W. B. Yeats

"Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes."

- Walt Whitman, Song of Myself

The book written by Llosa is nothing less than a deep and intense exploration of human existence. The cosmopolitanism and peculiar character of its historical protagonist, Roger Casement, manage to weave together the personal and the global, as Roger travels throughout Africa and Latin America, in an attempt to observe and ameliorate the suffering caused by the authorities of the Crown upon the indigenous populations.

Writing in beautiful prose, the author manages to bring Roger Casement back to life. A brilliant read, all the more so if seen as an attempt to counter the smear campaign initiated by the british authorities a century ago, in order to deface the legacy of one of Ireland's most treasured thinkers and revolutionaries.

This is the way stories and histories should be written.