Take a photo of a barcode or cover
3.77 AVERAGE
3.77 AVERAGE
mysterious
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
Haiku
...
It begins at night
A curious incident
It ends in green light
.
.
The lady misleads
As she often does, and yet
The mind of a dog
.
.
Special type of love
Like a pet begging for treats
Greedy relations
.
.
In breeding such hate
One's vintage life is at stake
World of mock privilege
...
It begins at night
A curious incident
It ends in green light
.
.
The lady misleads
As she often does, and yet
The mind of a dog
.
.
Special type of love
Like a pet begging for treats
Greedy relations
.
.
In breeding such hate
One's vintage life is at stake
World of mock privilege
mysterious
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
Zupelnie inna, lecz całkiem fajna. Początek lekko nużący. Zgadłem kto, ale nie całkowity proces.
funny
lighthearted
mysterious
relaxing
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
adventurous
mysterious
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
Poirot receives a letter, of course, so he and Hastings travel to a quaint town, of course. There is one obvious clue, and Poirot takes a surprising action to force the killer's hand.
“The dog hunts rabbits. Hercule Poirot hunts murderers.”
Funny how one forgets... I read this two years ago and somehow forgot who the culprit was! Some scenes were clear, but that fact had vanished. Actually, that was excellent - I could re-experience the murder mystery :O)
Once more, we have a totally bad bunch of people, all behaving in the most calculating ways. Who looks the guiltiest? Or perhaps it should be the other way around? Fear not - Poirot and Hastings are on the case.
Another enjoyable read. I think Christie used the dog/ball/accident in another story, a short story. It was found, in her notebooks (if my memory is correct), that she he had several plots, all rather different, that started with this incident. Yep - how did that brain work ;O)
Funny how one forgets... I read this two years ago and somehow forgot who the culprit was! Some scenes were clear, but that fact had vanished. Actually, that was excellent - I could re-experience the murder mystery :O)
Once more, we have a totally bad bunch of people, all behaving in the most calculating ways. Who looks the guiltiest? Or perhaps it should be the other way around? Fear not - Poirot and Hastings are on the case.
Another enjoyable read. I think Christie used the dog/ball/accident in another story, a short story. It was found, in her notebooks (if my memory is correct), that she he had several plots, all rather different, that started with this incident. Yep - how did that brain work ;O)