Reviews

Finnegans Wake by James Joyce

phigerinadon's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? N/A
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

smiths2112's review

Go to review page

slow-paced

5.0

blakezissman's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging funny lighthearted slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

msmagoo502's review against another edition

Go to review page

I have to read audiobooks because I'm blind and the audiobook version that I had was very bad recording and also there's a lot of either Celtic language in this book or it's written like Chaucer and it's just too hard to read or sit through so I'm just choosing not to torture myself with this. If they ever made a version of this without the crazy language that I could understand easier and actually feel like I was accomplishing something I would absolutely read that but the way it stands I can't do that to myself.

drief2001's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging funny reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? N/A
  • Strong character development? N/A
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

artemiscat's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Can i truly claim to have read this book? Yes. No. Yes, out-loud in great detail. No, never entirely. Yes, I've studied it. No, I don't understand most of it. In depth, out of depth.

In Dublin in the store that sells lemon soap we gathered around noon to read Joyce. Sometimes Wake read by experts and actors and analysts and one day of the few days I was there a hapless tourist from Spain who said after, "I'm sorry, my English is normally much better, but I don't understand it."

And everyone, even the professors said "We don't understand it either," and convinced the young man to come back later in the week and read something more accessible, like Dubliners.

I don't think we're supposed to understand it so much as feel it out, I think that's part of the point. But I am always seeking out those books that make me feel like I'm a little girl again, sneaking reading materials off my father's desk and diving in without total comprehension wherever it was the bookmark landed. Swimming towards meaning can be more fulfilling than knowing.

craigwiley89's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging emotional funny hopeful mysterious reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? N/A
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

I’ve never been so frequently annoyed at a book I’ve loved so much. The people who think it’s an infuriating slog are right, it’s just that the people who think it’s a a book with some of the most beautiful stuff ever written are right. There are wonders on every incomprehensible page. 

By the time I was halfway through it felt like different parts of my brain were leaking into each other as I read. It simply does things that other books can’t do, even in principle - the way its language means multiple layers can happen at the same time and mutually interact. But hoo, it’s rough going. 

ajreader's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Read my full thoughts on this book and hundreds more over at Read.Write.Repeat.

If I've learned anything from this challenge, it's that Joyce is simply not for me. I'm not anywhere close to bright enough to decipher his prose.

deandingus1078's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

Gibberish. Stop it.

bgatsch's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I'm struggling a bit here with assigning a star rating to this book. None of the standard metrics seem to apply. Did I like it? I don't know. Would I read it again? Maybe. Is it well-written? I'm not sure I'm qualified to make that judgement. And at this point, I'm glad to just be shelving it as "read." In the end, I'll just conclude that this is a reading experience unlike any other and trying to figure out what this book is about is a little like standing in front of a Rothko asking what it's supposed to be a painting of. Take it for what it is, and beyond anything else, it's an astounding piece of work.

Also, I love the "My review has spoilers" option for this book. What would that even look like? It turns out that Earwicker is the Howth Castle Environs! Oh no. Ruined that one now. And now I can use the spoiler tag, I guess.