Reviews

Consider Phlebas by Iain M. Banks

elpontir's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated

3.0

timinbc's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I must have read this a LONG time ago, because I barely remembered it as I re-read. Since then I've read all of the Culture series and some of the author's non-SF work. I gave it a C the first time, and now, in context, it's an A-.

This is not perfect, but I wouldn't expect the first book of a planned long series to be. It has groundwork to do. Random thoughts follow.

Culture vs Idirans is good; not Bad Guys vs Good Guys, and even a bit of "are we the baddies?"

The AIs, ships, drones etc are great, We get a gentle intro to the ship names that Banks later went so wonderfully crazy with. An Unaha-Closp may be my favourite out of this book.

Hasn't aged at all in the 31 years since it appeared.

There's all-out action, but also philosophy. Balveda's shifting attitudes are good. Sometimes there's too much explaining, and it's slow in places.

Fat Guy Island? Meh, we didn't need that.

Nor the whole "oh, man, this ultra-giant ringworld is gonna blow in, like, eight minutes; maybe we should go line up at the coat check and think about getting a taxi."

Near the end .. the resolution re the Mind was weak - but really what else could it have been?

And finally, after hundreds of pages of searching Balveda for memoryform things? She produces a near-planet-buster weapon from (not spoiling). OK, we were told how impossibly tiny the interior of a mind gets, and we may well be well past the level at which quarks are considered large, but sheesh.

Still, a good start to a great series.

topfy's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.5

testaroscia's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Another re-read after many years and although excellent I now feel it inferior to Player of Games. I felt I learnt a lot more about the Culture through the latter however this is a fine introduction

cecile87's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I couldn't get past the first third of the book. Once I peaked ahead by reading various synopses of the storyline, I decided it wasn't worth the read. I have to like the main character or at least find him or her intriguing.

squeeb's review

Go to review page

2.75

Slow in places. Relatively dislikeable/shallow characters. 

eirikvii's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

This was a slog. Did not find the main character likeable or relateable, this may have been on purpose. Most infuriating for me was the, oftentimes, absolutely incomprehensible descriptions of places and environments. I expected some techobabble, which was fine, but there were way too many instances of words used to describe things and places that I had to look up. «Learn more english» WELL YEAH. I GUESS. 

kivt's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

this was fine, i guess. i lost interest about halfway through but finished. not a great intro to the culture, i think.

jamesarosen's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Great world-building. Banks is dogged in staying true to the physics of his universe. But the book is both grotesque and boring and the characters are shallow.