Scan barcode
savaging's review
4.0
I like Baudrillard in spite of myself. He is an old curmudgeon, and when I finish reading him I feel hopeless. This is largely because he's very convincing.
The book is a brilliant critique of Marxism. Just as Baudrillard breaks down the distinctions we make between use value and exchange value, revealing the artificiality buried deep in seemingly-natural use-value and need, he likewise fractures the distinction between capitalist and communist markets. I feel relieved up to a point, because I'm also critical of the deep work-ethic and desire to dominate nature at the core of communism. And yet Baudrillard never stops at a point, and he isn't here to relieve anyone.
The aporia that Baudrillard can't move beyond -- the question of our time -- is why voluntary servitude exists. Most leftist theorists try to show that there's nothing "voluntary" about modern servitude. Baudrillard is either too much a contrarian or too dedicated to honesty to take this track: instead he pursues the possibility that voluntary servitude is deep in human desire.
His theories leave nothing to be done, and nothing to be fought for. It is a legitimate criticism to respond that such ideas could only surface in the mind of a man who hadn't ever gone hungry or braved a sweatshop factory collapse every day at work. And yet, even accounting for his privilege, there is something to his ideas that can't be brushed off . . .
The book is a brilliant critique of Marxism. Just as Baudrillard breaks down the distinctions we make between use value and exchange value, revealing the artificiality buried deep in seemingly-natural use-value and need, he likewise fractures the distinction between capitalist and communist markets. I feel relieved up to a point, because I'm also critical of the deep work-ethic and desire to dominate nature at the core of communism. And yet Baudrillard never stops at a point, and he isn't here to relieve anyone.
The aporia that Baudrillard can't move beyond -- the question of our time -- is why voluntary servitude exists. Most leftist theorists try to show that there's nothing "voluntary" about modern servitude. Baudrillard is either too much a contrarian or too dedicated to honesty to take this track: instead he pursues the possibility that voluntary servitude is deep in human desire.
His theories leave nothing to be done, and nothing to be fought for. It is a legitimate criticism to respond that such ideas could only surface in the mind of a man who hadn't ever gone hungry or braved a sweatshop factory collapse every day at work. And yet, even accounting for his privilege, there is something to his ideas that can't be brushed off . . .
garawill's review
challenging
dark
reflective
medium-paced
4.75
Make sure that you're sober for this one.
eiron's review
challenging
informative
reflective
slow-paced
3.5
Content Warnings
Moderate: Body horror, Sexual content, Violence, and Self harm
Included content warnings for inclusion of quotes of passages from J.G. Ballard's Crash.ajmcwhinney's review
3.0
I strongly disagree with Baudrillard's totalizing view of the social as simulacra/ simulation; while he might make some good descriptive claims on the symptoms of postmodernity, he extrapolates them to the entirety of the social. The real still exists, and representation/meaning still operates... Just not everywhere.
The best essay here is "The Animals: Territory and Metamorpheses" (an interesting critique of psychoanalysis in terms of Western conceptions of the animal). Mostly everything else is a nice curiosity and sort of fun to read.
The best essay here is "The Animals: Territory and Metamorpheses" (an interesting critique of psychoanalysis in terms of Western conceptions of the animal). Mostly everything else is a nice curiosity and sort of fun to read.