Take a photo of a barcode or cover
4.02 AVERAGE
4.02 AVERAGE
Overall a good read. Lost a star for rambling a bit, but I'm looking forward to the sequel.
adventurous
challenging
tense
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
adventurous
hopeful
inspiring
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
Fun adventure sci-fi with a hopeful look at the future. I read this book during hurricane Wilma and it was wonderful distraction. Set's up a really big and fun universe that's explored in the Commonwealth series which is then followed up with a number of other series.
A wildly infuriating read. Interesting premise that gets bogged down in too much minutiae.
adventurous
dark
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
I loved this book on the same level as The Unincorporated Man. Fantastic story and universe building, and I loved how all of the character plotlines came together in the end. A bit long winded at parts and a major cliffhanger at the end annoyed me, but not enough to subtract from my rating.
slow-paced
Leyendo "Pandora's Star" me he acordado varias veces de las sensaciones que tuve cuando fui a ver "Apocalypse Now Redux". "Apocalypse Now" es una de mis películas favoritas, así que cuando se estrenó una versión del director con metraje extra supe que tenía que verla. Sin embargo salí del cine decepcionado: cierto que las nuevas escenas ayudaban a situar aún más la historia, pero lo hacían a cambio de romper el ritmo de la narración y conseguir que la película se hiciera pesada a ratos.
¿Y qué tiene que ver esto con "Pandora's Star"? Pues que en demasiadas ocasiones me ha dado la impresión de estar leyendo la versión del director de una gran novela, echada a perder por un afán de abrumar al lector con información. Las introducciones de cada nuevo personaje se me hacían en ocasiones eternas; no es necesario tanto para darnos a entender sus motivaciones, salvo por el mero gusto de describirnos con aún más detalle el universo de la Commonwealth.
Y esto de acuerdo con que precisamente este universo es el auténtico protagonista de la novela, y que en él Hamilton realiza una creación deslumbrante. Pero eso no me ha evitado más de un resoplido cuando, justo después de una escena en la que la acción parecía al fin encarrilarse, todo volvía a detenerse durante 10, 20,... páginas para mostrarnos a un personaje nuevo, describirnos su mundo, hablarnos de su familia y, en definitiva, romper el ritmo de lectura.
Supongo que todos estos circunloquios tendrán su justificación y que "Judas Unchained" tal vez haga que tenga que tragarme mis palabras. Pero lo cierto es que ahora mismo no sé si tengo muchas ganas de empezármela.
¿Y qué tiene que ver esto con "Pandora's Star"? Pues que en demasiadas ocasiones me ha dado la impresión de estar leyendo la versión del director de una gran novela, echada a perder por un afán de abrumar al lector con información. Las introducciones de cada nuevo personaje se me hacían en ocasiones eternas; no es necesario tanto para darnos a entender sus motivaciones, salvo por el mero gusto de describirnos con aún más detalle el universo de la Commonwealth.
Y esto de acuerdo con que precisamente este universo es el auténtico protagonista de la novela, y que en él Hamilton realiza una creación deslumbrante. Pero eso no me ha evitado más de un resoplido cuando, justo después de una escena en la que la acción parecía al fin encarrilarse, todo volvía a detenerse durante 10, 20,... páginas para mostrarnos a un personaje nuevo, describirnos su mundo, hablarnos de su familia y, en definitiva, romper el ritmo de lectura.
Supongo que todos estos circunloquios tendrán su justificación y que "Judas Unchained" tal vez haga que tenga que tragarme mis palabras. Pero lo cierto es que ahora mismo no sé si tengo muchas ganas de empezármela.
This was odd to read at the same time as Otherland by Tad Williams, because they both overwrite things to an almost pathological level. However, all the details in this story, while not, perhaps, always useful, are always consistent and inform the POV we're experiencing.
CONTENT WARNING:
Things that were awesome:
-Scope. There are so many places and times in this book! So many POVs!
-Plotting. I think this is one of the most tightly plotted books I've read in quite some time. Every scene was framed to move the story along. Every POV said something different about the society and the experiences, without retreading old territory. We got some very close, personal moments and understanding of system wide machinations. Brilliant.
-Paula and Adam. I liked their story best, I think.
Things that perhaps were not so awesome:
-Hella long. I'm not sure I needed to know the dimensions of every room everyone walked into or their thoughts on skydiving or being 200. It wasn't bad, my editor's pen didn't jump to my hand, but this is a doorstop and maybe we could have achieved the same ends with a few thousand fewer words.
-How we talk about bodies. Funny, for a book this extensive, it really REALLY wanted everyone to think all the time about slimness. Everyone was either beautiful and fit or about to get "rejuvenated" anyway so they could be a little portly. Bleh.
Definitely going to read on, once I catch my breath from holding this bad boy up for so long.
CONTENT WARNING:
Spoiler
murder, harm to children, cults, misogyny (intentional and casual), cults, inability to consent, medical experimentation, torture, fatphobia/ableism.Things that were awesome:
-Scope. There are so many places and times in this book! So many POVs!
-Plotting. I think this is one of the most tightly plotted books I've read in quite some time. Every scene was framed to move the story along. Every POV said something different about the society and the experiences, without retreading old territory. We got some very close, personal moments and understanding of system wide machinations. Brilliant.
-Paula and Adam. I liked their story best, I think.
Things that perhaps were not so awesome:
-Hella long. I'm not sure I needed to know the dimensions of every room everyone walked into or their thoughts on skydiving or being 200. It wasn't bad, my editor's pen didn't jump to my hand, but this is a doorstop and maybe we could have achieved the same ends with a few thousand fewer words.
-How we talk about bodies. Funny, for a book this extensive, it really REALLY wanted everyone to think all the time about slimness. Everyone was either beautiful and fit or about to get "rejuvenated" anyway so they could be a little portly. Bleh.
Definitely going to read on, once I catch my breath from holding this bad boy up for so long.
During a lunch break between classes, sharing all-you-can-eat sushi with my friend Ather, we shared the book series we've been reading: I told him about Red Rising, and he introduced me to the Commonwealth series!
Emotional Impact: 4/5
'Pandora's Star' creates tension and emotional resonance through various masterfully crafted scenarios. From high-stakes court trials to heart-pounding crime chases and the looming dread of alien invasion, I was kept heavily invested. Although few and far in-between there are also touching moments such as the whimsical journey of Ozzie with his unlikely companions, a young boy and an alien with whom communication is barely possible. Hamilton does a great job of evoking an array of emotions that draws readers deep into the story's vast universe.
Thought Provokingness: 4/5
'Pandora's Star' poses profound questions about human nature and our species' destiny among the stars. The most compelling theme centers on human individuality in an era of interstellar expansion. If given the ability to spread across multiple solar systems, would humanity pack itself in to isolated bubbles, losing our ability to unite against common threats? This issue is brought to the forefront when faced with the existential threat of MorningLightMountain, forcing us to question whether our tendency toward independence, or to form opposing groups with one another, could become our greatest vulnerability and lead to our demise. The book also prompts reflection on immortality - both through the lens of human rejuvenation technology, and through the terrifying perspective of an alien consciousness so obsessed with its own eternal existence that it views all other life as an inherent threat. These themes resonate with discussions about human unity in the face of global challenges and our own species' drive for longevity.
Characters: 4/5
'Pandora's Star' shines in its portrayal of complex, and multifaceted characters who challenge our expectations. Paula Myo stands out as a particularly fascinating character, being a detective genetically engineered for absolute devotion to justice, abducted to live in to a society that doesn't share her rigid moral framework. Her struggle to navigate this cultural disconnect invokves her to question whether her core identity is a leash that guides or restricts her, creating a compelling internal conflict. Then there's Ozzie, who subverts all expectations of what a wealthy, genius inventor should be. Despite being the architect of humanity's greatest technological achievement, the wormhole, he chooses a spiritual rather than scientific path in search for understanding alien life. Then comes the chilling MorningLightMountain, an antagonist that is quite terrifying because of its complete alienness. Its single-minded focus on survival and inability to conceive of coexistence makes it a unique and frightening adversary that defies traditional villain tropes. These characters, among many others, populate the vast Commonwealth universe with distinct personalities that feel both believable and instrumental to the story.
Plot: 4/5
'Pandora's Star' employs a measured pace that might initially challenge some readers, but this careful build-up serves a greater purpose. Hamilton begins by painting detailed portraits of , sometimes seemingly mundane, small moments - family barbecues, daily routines, personal relationships - that later prove integral to the larger narrative. As the story progresses, these separate threads begin to interweave more tightly, and the pace accelerates tenfold. When the true scope of the threat becomes clear, the earlier worldbuilding pays off as we see this carefully constructed society turned upside down. The transformation from peaceful expansion to existential crisis is particularly effective because we've spent so much time understanding what's at stake.
Prose: 4/5
Hamilton's writing achieves an impressive balance between complexity and accessibility. This versatility in his writing allows him to maintain clarity even when juggling multiple storylines and complex technological concepts, which made the sophisticated world of the Commonwealth digestible and incredibly engaging for me.
Worldbuilding: 5/5
The worldbuilding in 'Pandora's Star' is nothing short of masterful. Hamilton constructs a future human civilization that spans multiple solar systems, connected by wormhole technology, yet he never loses sight of the details that make each world feel real. His ability to shift between macro and micro perspectives, from the grand scale of interstellar politics and wormhole networks, to the intimate details of how this technology affects daily life in a single neighborhood based on their planet in relation to the Commonwealth, has been the reason why I can't put the book down. The Commonwealth itself is a fascinating creation, showing how humanity might evolve when given access to instantaneous travel and immortality. The alien civilizations are equally well done, particularly the Primes, whose completely foreign biology and psychology give them a completely different line of reasoning. Every aspect of the world feels thoroughly considered, from the economic implications of nearly-immortal humans to the social impact of memory crystal technology.
Overall: 4/5
'Pandora's Star' rewards patient readers with an epic story of humanity's future. While Herbert's 'Dune' shows humanity constrained by scarce resources, Hamilton presents an equally compelling opposite, humanity with unlimited room to expand. From its thoughtful exploration of human individuality versus collective survival, to its complex characters like Paula Myo and Ozzie, to its alien antagonist in MorningLightMountain, the novel delivers on multiple levels. The worldbuilding is particularly outstanding, creating a future that feels both fantastical and eerily plausible. What began as a casual recommendation over sushi became an all-consuming journey through one of science fiction's most meticulously crafted universes :]
Emotional Impact: 4/5
'Pandora's Star' creates tension and emotional resonance through various masterfully crafted scenarios. From high-stakes court trials to heart-pounding crime chases and the looming dread of alien invasion, I was kept heavily invested. Although few and far in-between there are also touching moments such as the whimsical journey of Ozzie with his unlikely companions, a young boy and an alien with whom communication is barely possible. Hamilton does a great job of evoking an array of emotions that draws readers deep into the story's vast universe.
Thought Provokingness: 4/5
'Pandora's Star' poses profound questions about human nature and our species' destiny among the stars. The most compelling theme centers on human individuality in an era of interstellar expansion. If given the ability to spread across multiple solar systems, would humanity pack itself in to isolated bubbles, losing our ability to unite against common threats? This issue is brought to the forefront when faced with the existential threat of MorningLightMountain, forcing us to question whether our tendency toward independence, or to form opposing groups with one another, could become our greatest vulnerability and lead to our demise. The book also prompts reflection on immortality - both through the lens of human rejuvenation technology, and through the terrifying perspective of an alien consciousness so obsessed with its own eternal existence that it views all other life as an inherent threat. These themes resonate with discussions about human unity in the face of global challenges and our own species' drive for longevity.
Characters: 4/5
'Pandora's Star' shines in its portrayal of complex, and multifaceted characters who challenge our expectations. Paula Myo stands out as a particularly fascinating character, being a detective genetically engineered for absolute devotion to justice, abducted to live in to a society that doesn't share her rigid moral framework. Her struggle to navigate this cultural disconnect invokves her to question whether her core identity is a leash that guides or restricts her, creating a compelling internal conflict. Then there's Ozzie, who subverts all expectations of what a wealthy, genius inventor should be. Despite being the architect of humanity's greatest technological achievement, the wormhole, he chooses a spiritual rather than scientific path in search for understanding alien life. Then comes the chilling MorningLightMountain, an antagonist that is quite terrifying because of its complete alienness. Its single-minded focus on survival and inability to conceive of coexistence makes it a unique and frightening adversary that defies traditional villain tropes. These characters, among many others, populate the vast Commonwealth universe with distinct personalities that feel both believable and instrumental to the story.
Plot: 4/5
'Pandora's Star' employs a measured pace that might initially challenge some readers, but this careful build-up serves a greater purpose. Hamilton begins by painting detailed portraits of , sometimes seemingly mundane, small moments - family barbecues, daily routines, personal relationships - that later prove integral to the larger narrative. As the story progresses, these separate threads begin to interweave more tightly, and the pace accelerates tenfold. When the true scope of the threat becomes clear, the earlier worldbuilding pays off as we see this carefully constructed society turned upside down. The transformation from peaceful expansion to existential crisis is particularly effective because we've spent so much time understanding what's at stake.
Prose: 4/5
Hamilton's writing achieves an impressive balance between complexity and accessibility. This versatility in his writing allows him to maintain clarity even when juggling multiple storylines and complex technological concepts, which made the sophisticated world of the Commonwealth digestible and incredibly engaging for me.
Worldbuilding: 5/5
The worldbuilding in 'Pandora's Star' is nothing short of masterful. Hamilton constructs a future human civilization that spans multiple solar systems, connected by wormhole technology, yet he never loses sight of the details that make each world feel real. His ability to shift between macro and micro perspectives, from the grand scale of interstellar politics and wormhole networks, to the intimate details of how this technology affects daily life in a single neighborhood based on their planet in relation to the Commonwealth, has been the reason why I can't put the book down. The Commonwealth itself is a fascinating creation, showing how humanity might evolve when given access to instantaneous travel and immortality. The alien civilizations are equally well done, particularly the Primes, whose completely foreign biology and psychology give them a completely different line of reasoning. Every aspect of the world feels thoroughly considered, from the economic implications of nearly-immortal humans to the social impact of memory crystal technology.
Overall: 4/5
'Pandora's Star' rewards patient readers with an epic story of humanity's future. While Herbert's 'Dune' shows humanity constrained by scarce resources, Hamilton presents an equally compelling opposite, humanity with unlimited room to expand. From its thoughtful exploration of human individuality versus collective survival, to its complex characters like Paula Myo and Ozzie, to its alien antagonist in MorningLightMountain, the novel delivers on multiple levels. The worldbuilding is particularly outstanding, creating a future that feels both fantastical and eerily plausible. What began as a casual recommendation over sushi became an all-consuming journey through one of science fiction's most meticulously crafted universes :]