Take a photo of a barcode or cover
laurenology's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
It takes a while (like 60% of the way through) for anything that noticable to happen, but I found the premise and characters intriguing enough to keep on going. Glad I did.
Graphic: Chronic illness, Confinement, Transphobia, Blood, Outing, and Dysphoria
Moderate: Suicidal thoughts and Car accident
elenavarg's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.75
The whole book felt like a collection of interesting themes and ideas, but none of those themes and ideas get fully explored, except for the romance, which is very insta-lovey, which is not really my thing.
The dialogue also feels kinda off to me. I can’t quite explain it, but Sol talks like an MCU character (derogatory) and it really took me out of the story!
Moderate: Ableism, Chronic illness, Confinement, Emotional abuse, Hate crime, Infidelity, Mental illness, Panic attacks/disorders, Sexual content, Terminal illness, Toxic relationship, Transphobia, Violence, Blood, Medical content, Grief, Medical trauma, Car accident, Outing, Dysphoria, and Classism
mgpalpha's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Also the
Graphic: Sexual content
Moderate: Grief
Minor: Transphobia
anxieteaisme's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Overall it was pretty good, just not my favourite.
Graphic: Infidelity, Panic attacks/disorders, Physical abuse, Sexual content, Toxic relationship, Transphobia, and Grief
anna_hepworth's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Having read the blurb, I knew going in that Sol is a vampire, and the world building around this is wonderful. That vampirism is used as a treatment for otherwise fatal diseases, that there is a network of services, that it is the cause of issues with HR were all wonderful details that interrogated the vampire tropes from a disability perspective.
There were other things that I didn't know, which I did really love. Sol's relationship with gender, and then their relationship with Elise, and how gender was both fundamental and a tiny part of their relationship were beautifully done. And, as mentioned, fan culture and fanfiction played an important role.
Moderate: Transphobia
bacteriosage's review
0.5
the last thing i’ll say is HOWWW are these characters in their FORTIES???? they read like teenagers steeped in the deepest trenches of tumblr discourse. almost DNF’d at finding out the love interest works for AO3, then again with supernatural fanfic jokes, then again with an “assigned cop at birth” joke. admittedly i don’t tend to enjoy when books date themselves, just a personal preference, but i absolutely loved tamsyn muir’s pop culture references in tlt — this felt like a horribly ham-fisted version of that.
maybe i will try to put together a more coherent review later because i think what sucks (pun intended) the most is that the concept of a transmasc, vampire archivist is SO COOL and there were even a few pages that connnected those themes in really interesting ways, but the overall thread of them was totally lost in the story as a whole for me and i just felt like i was stuck listening to the two most obnoxious characters on earth talk ad nauseum and still say absolutely nothing. i couldn’t even tell the difference in character voices honestly, they all just felt like different vessels for the author because they all speak the same. i don’t think i’ve ever finished a book so quickly just because i needed it to be over.
okay TRULY the last thing i’ll say but there was absolutely no trans joy in this book that was not in some way connected to dysphoria, and i think we deserve better than that, especially when the book is written by a trans author.
Graphic: Deadnaming, Homophobia, Transphobia, and Lesbophobia
Moderate: Car accident
the d*ke slur is used repeatedly in this book, it does not appear to be used as a slur in the context but given the overall deeply lesbophobic themes in the book it does read that way in my opinionc_alexander's review against another edition
The description of women, physically, in general was a little uncomfortable. Some parts
parts also read like the author just found out about the word “dyke” and was excited to show it off, yet despite that there wasn’t really exploration into the experience or even existence of transmasc lesbians? Which seemed a bit antithetical
Also struggled with the reliance on fanfiction + ao3 as a plot device. It’s clear this was written by an archivist who has a deep passion for the craft, but the particular way fandom was used to explore this really fell flat. The TV show the protagonist is involved in the fandom of also had a LOT of excerpts and long descriptions of what happened in it - it felt very much like that was a seperate story the author also wanted to tell, but it didn’t run parallel to the story of Dead Collections, we just got random chunks of it
It definitely read like the love interest was going to realise they’re genderqueer and the joking/hinting about this was really stale/stunted/awkward
Usually love work that is queer in structure/form/style as well as in storytelling, and the autobiographical feel of the narrative was interesting, but found I was forcing myself to get through each chapter of this
Moderate: Sexual content
Minor: Death, Transphobia, and Injury/Injury detail
elxla's review
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
As a queer archivist, I had really high hopes for this book! It was written well, and I enjoyed the various epistle episodes and in world interludes. unfortunately, I struggled with the vampirism metaphor and like many of the reviewers, felt that the exploration of gender and sexuality was difficult to navigate (and leaned into stereotypes and vague lesphobia and transphobia). I wish the pacing had been a little more consistent- much of the book felt rushed, but all in separate ways. Fellman presents a very melancholic view of the archives.
Moderate: Homophobia, Transphobia, and Blood
soggycedar's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
Graphic: Violence
Moderate: Hate crime, Sexual content, and Transphobia
Minor: Addiction, Suicidal thoughts, Medical content, and Outing
buttermellow's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
3.0
Graphic: Ableism
Moderate: Infidelity, Suicidal thoughts, Transphobia, Car accident, and Dysphoria