Reviews with content warning for Animal death - Emily Wilde's Encyclopaedia of Faeries

Reviews tagging 'Animal death'

Emily Wilde's Encyclopaedia of Faeries by Heather Fawcett

83 reviews

dogoodwithbooks's review against another edition

dark mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

During an expedition to Hrafnsvik, Ljosland, Cambridge professor Emily Wilde uncovers unknown secrets of the fae world she has spent her whole life studying as she tries to save Hrafnsvik from the Hidden Ones alongside her colleague and frenemy Wendell Bambleby.

Emily Wilde's Encyclopaedia of Faeries is an interesting take on the fantasy genre: a low-stakes novel that's not quite so cozy and is a perfect blend of magical realism and Victorian elements. Written entirely from journal entries during Emily's time in Ljosland, the epistolary format works really well for this book as readers are transported in the intricate world-building behind Fawcett's fae world.

Additionally, Emily is such an interesting narrator for this book, and provides a unique POV throughout the book. While Fawcett doesn't say that she's autistic in the book, as an #ActuallyAutistic reviewer, one can notice that there are some of her attributes are similar to other autistic individuals. Regardless of whether Emily is autistic or not, Fawcett does a stellar job with detailing Emily's growth throughout the book as she learns to open herself up to others.

That being said, if you're looking for a low-stakes fantasy novel with fae, cozy aesthetic with dark undertones and a hint of romance, and/or a strong female protagonist (who may be autistic), you would probably enjoy reading Emily Wilde's Encyclopaedia of Faeries.

Content Warnings

aileron's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous lighthearted slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

Content Warnings

tacochelle's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny lighthearted medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Very delightful, the relationship between Emily and Wendell reminds me of Howl and Sophie, from Howl's Moving Castle. Not exactly the same, but enough that it made me happy. It was a bit slow to start, but once they start solving the faerie-related problems of the villagers together, I was hooked. The faeries here are both the household helper/prankster as well as the beautiful and violent high fey types, very traditional folklore. Not the horny Sarah J. Maas ones. Adult, but not that kind of adult. This was just a very nice, folklore-based fantasy.

Content Warnings

flohbeutel's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

Lasst es mich so ausdrücken. Das Hörbuch geht 11 Stunden, und das war etwa 6 Stunden zu lang für den Inhalt.

Ich denke, ich hätte das Buch mehr gemocht, wenn es, wie in etwa die Wayward Children-Reihe von Seannan McGuire, in kleineren Episoden erzählt worden wäre. So war es eher wie eine Aneinanderreihung verschiedener Ereignisse, die nacheinander passiert sind, alleine stehend allerdings viel spannender gewesen wären. So hätte sich auch Bamblebys und Wildes besser als wie aus dem Nichts entwickeln können.

Was ich mochte:
• Der Hund überlebt (falls noch jemand realisiert, dass das Buch viel dunkler ist als erwartet, und mittendrin panisch googelt, ohne eine Antwort zu finden)
• Der Name Bambleby
• Das Buch ist schön Goth und Horror
• Das Kleine Volk ist böse (nach menschlichem Standard. Nach ihrem sind sie nur gelangweilt)

Was ich nicht mochte:
• Soll das eine Liebesgeschichte sein? Weil "Hast du nicht gemerkt, dass ich etwas für dich fühle?" "Ich hatte gehofft, du sprichst es nicht aus", das Ganze ziemlich gut zusammenfasst
• Als KollegInnen und FreundInnen wären sie viel besser gewesen
• Es ist einfach lang
• Und unzusammenhängen

Content Warnings

takarakei's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous lighthearted medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.75

While this isn't my typical cup of tea when it comes to fantasy, I did enjoy this. It's very cozy, a bit funny, and whimsical.
The romance felt a bit lackluster to me - it's a historical kind of setting so in a way it reads like a historical romance in that aspect, where everything is very internal (also because the book is written in journal entries).

Content Warnings

louisallama's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous lighthearted fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

I absolutely loved this book. Emily's socially awkward and slightly curmudgeonly nature and her love for faeries and academia, contrasted with Wendell's charm, chaos, and love for doing as little work as possible were so incredibly lovely. I loved all the villagers, as well as the use of fae as both malevolent and mysterious, and the subject of academic study. Emily and Wendell's banter was just so fun, and

the whole entry around Wendell's declaration of love was so chaotic but romantic, perfect for these two characters!

Content Warnings

dragonaion's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional funny inspiring mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

At first I was not taken by the "matter of fact" and neutral approach of the story. I thought the first two chapters were dry and simple, but I can attest that is the author writing the world through the eyes of the main character and is very apropos. By chapter three, I was smitten and devoured every page.
As a lover of fae of all kinds, I was tickled and delighted by the smoothness and almost natural involvement of the fae in the story. None of it was out of place (which is saying something, given the nature of some of the scenes) and it all blended and came into place perfectly. With such expressions of high fantasy, it is hard to mistake some parts

like an animal cloak that melts in the heat, but reluctantly gives the wearer what they need

as being absurd and not belonging, like suddenly seeing a majestic and shining pegasus in a normal field. This magic, however, was laced in so naturally that it naturally belonged and was wonderful.

Content Warnings

ymziegler's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark lighthearted medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75

I liked this book. I love the vibe of being in a cottage in a very very snowy town and going out to study fae. The faerie lore is incredibly developed, there are so many details throughout the book and it's explained in a way that fits the tone of Emily, who is writing the book as her research journal. The romance wasn't extremely developed, though I believe that's because there will be a sequel. Wendell was a fun character, I enjoyed how his not-caring and Emily's not-caring kind of worked together but came from different sources. I loved Poe's character, he's just a little faerie who bakes bread in exchange for not having to shovel the snow in front of his tree! Also, once the conflict picked up, I couldn't put the book down. There is also a sapphic couple in the village and their relationship is not a major part of the plotline but they are very sweet. I recommend this book if you enjoy fae, faerie lore, and don't mind a light romance. To be clear, even if the romance wasn't super present in the book, the relationship between Wendell and Emily was incredibly entertaining even without the romance.

Content Warnings

itsnotalakeitsanocean's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

If this is your first time reading a book about fairies, you'll probably like it but there are definitely better books out there. That's not to say this book is bad, however.

Pros

The setting was really unexpected, but I really enjoyed it as someone who has spent several holidays in Norway. The author really captured the vibe of a small, insulated Scandinavian town that is distrusting to outsiders.
On a related note, I really liked Lilja and Margaret. They were a very sweet couple and I'm glad they survived
being taken by fairies
. Aud really grew on me as well.
This is definitely a "your mileage may vary" thing, but I liked the use of footnotes to discuss existing academic texts, their authors and their lives.

Cons

The pacing is a bit all over the place. I felt like it was a very slow start to actually get to the plot it wanted to tell, and then went at haphazard paces when it got there.
The romance felt really half-baked. Emily felt like she went from hating Wendell's guts to entertaining the idea she liked him very suddenly. This isn't to say I don't like slow burn romances, but I think Emily and Wendell lack the chemistry to pull it off. I'm sure this will get fixed in the next book but I'm not particularly itching to read it.
I don't really understand what possessed Emily to
chop down the magic tree and free the king. Especially when all signs pointed it to being a very bad idea and she just went "how about I do it anyway?". I think if Emily and Wendell argued over the merits of doing so, with Emily speculating that maybe freeing the king would stop the children from being spoiled, it would have made more sense.

Amusing tangents

As someone with a queer identity, I always find it unintentionally funny when authors use the word "queer" to mean "strange" when describing abstract or inanimate objects. This book is no exception. Get ready for lots of unexpected queer things!
I'm definitely inclined to think Emily is autistic - intentionally or not.

Content Warnings

emilywemily6's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark lighthearted mysterious slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.5

I really enjoyed this book! It was a cozy historical fantasy- which is the perfect recipe. The book felt slow and meandering with no real plot throughout, only numerous subplots that all resolved rather quickly. Whenever I was reading, I was intrigued and couldn’t put it down. When I wasn’t reading, however, I didn’t feel a particular pull to pick it up. The variety of fae was fascinating and I kept thinking it might just be real. I loved the information Emily was able to glean as well as the unanswered questions. I loved Wendell too and appreciated their relationship. A really delightful book!

Content Warnings

More...