Reviews

The Front Runner by Patricia Nell Warren

vomiii's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

In an attempt to gather my thoughts after reading The Front Runner, I have a lot to say but I don’t at the same time.

Billy is one of a kind! He’s ambitious, confident, and intelligent all while standing against what’s considered “normal” in terms of sexuality. Harlan, his coach, is the narrator but Billy is the star of the show.

Harlan and Billy quickly develop feelings for one another and get into a relationship in secret. They mainly do this because 1. The relationship is “unprofessional” (it’s coach x athelete) and 2. They didn’t want to jeopardize Billy’s track career and his dream to go to the ‘70s Olympics.

The author does a very good job on tackling social issues. It sheds light on the importance of human and LGBTQ+ rights in athletic spaces and I enjoyed reading about those who have been silenced fighting their way into being heard.

However, I will admit, this book was a bit of a bore. I think the author dragged the story a little too long and I believe it could’ve been cut the book down to at least 200 pages.

Though the book is marketed as a love story, I feel as if I barely got a glimpse of Harlan and Billy’s relationship other than descriptions of how they’ve spent their time together off-book (which I found kind of annoying).

First off all, Harlan wasn’t a good partner. He was hotheaded, rude, and constantly projected his insecurities onto Billy. For a man his age, you would think he’d be the wiser/mature one but he acted like a 17-year-old (I’m wondering if years of repressing his sexuality plays a part in his childishness). Albeit Billy’s reassurance when Harlan accused him of sleeping with his best friend, Vince, Harlan would continue to put it over his head. Not to mention the constant cases of miscommunication??

To be real, I couldn’t understand what Billy saw in Harlan other than the fact he was an older, taller, and attractive beef-caked ex-Marine. Personality-wise, his sucks ass, and he didn’t even try to improve as the chapters went by (other than fighting for LGBTQ+ rights when it came to his gay runners competing against straight runners).

Billy, on the other hand, was the opposite. He was patient, kind, and always willed himself to see the good in people. I loved that the author made him Buddhist and I had the chance to learn a bit about the religion. He never abided by violence, rather, he followed peace. That’s what I loved the most about him! He was too good for Harlan—for the world even—and it was a shame he was murdered in the
very place he considered his safe place (the track field). I hope Billy thrives wherever his running shoes takes him!

keraashley's review

Go to review page

3.0

Id never heard of this book before it was gifted to me but apparently it’s noted as the first queer novel to reach mainstream success critically and commercially so that’s cool. I have very mixed feelings about it though. 
Pros: I absolutely LOVED Billy’s character, I like that he’s a competitive runner bc it adds suspense but it’s not an overly aggressive sport, I like the way Billy and Harlan are as a couple and the historical aspects and timeframe, the work everyone was going for the queer community, and supporting an openly queer runner. 
Cons: the age gap between Billy Harlan, I know Billy was an adult but Harlan was his coach, still felt weird. Doesn’t age well, written in the 70s, overt transphobia and sexism ABOUNDS. The timeline of the whole story is so rushed, it takes place in under 2 years. And the ending (why is it so graphic omg)  made me so sad and then confused, but a mad confused, so much so that I developed a headache. For historical significance, I’m glad I read it, I’ll hold onto it but idk when I’ll read it again. Maybe some day.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ndizz87's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

So I’m not quite sure how I actually found this book. I think I was just surfing Goodreads and stumbled across it. It’s little blurb had something about it being the first best-seller Queer novel ever. So, naturally, that piqued my interest. I had bought it some time ago and while persuing my bookshelf, stumbled upon it and gave it a chance. It was a serviceable book that delves into the struggles of being gay in the 1970s. However, it bleeds melodrama in a plot not particularly that exciting with an ending that is both odd and farcical.

We begin with Harlan Brown, a man on the verge of his forties. He coaches track at a small, private college called Prescott which is insanely liberal. They don’t do grades, it’s strictly pass/fail. They hire their students as faculty. They create programs out of thin air. The campus is the founder’s home he converts due to his wealth. It’s all a little too good to be true. Harlan is a hardened, closeted gay man. He comes from the marines, had an up and coming coaching career which was shattered after a student lied to the Penn State administration about Harlan making an advance on him. Naturally, he is fired. His wife and children leave him. After the Penn State debacle, he heads to New York where he quickly becomes a prostitute of sorts (he admits to getting $200 to whip his clients). However, it’s mentioned and stressed several times that he was a really good prostitute and a high-priced one. Good for him?

After spending some time in New York (purgatory), he is tracked down by Joe Prescott, the founder of the liberal college to teach track. Joe doesn’t care about Harlan’s sexuality. He doesn’t care if he dates his students, provided they’re legal. And so, Harlan goes to teach athletics and coach track at Prescott college in relative peace and quiet for the next four years. That is, until three shaggy looking hippies land at his office door. They’re track runners who have been kicked out of their own college after their sexuality is discovered. Vince, Jacques, and Billy. They want to run and plead with Harlan to give them a chance. Harlan knows this could stir up quite a bit of trouble, but he’s impressed by their running and their records from their previous college.

Naturally, Harlan and one of the boys, Billy, fall in love. It’s definitely a different kind of love from what I’m used to reading about. Harlan is 40 by the middle of the novel. Billy is 22, I believe. Their age difference, while very interesting, doesn’t seem to play a huge factor in the novel which was a little disappointing. Other than the gossip mills making hay out of it, it doesn’t particularly factor into their relationship. Billy is an “old soul” for sure. He’s a buddhist vegetarian that will answer any question you ask honestly and bluntly. He wants to live openly and doesn’t want to hide. He also doesn’t want to seek out attention either. Billy is quite the interesting character. His father is also gay, a constitutional lawyer, and raised Billy on his own. This was a very intriguing idea, but it followed a pretty routine father/son relationship. There could have been a lot to explore there, but the novel’s focus is Harlan so it makes passing references only.

For most of the novel we delve into the Oregon three’s training and competitions as students of Prescott. Their glory gets more and more attention for the small school and soon Harlan and the Oregon three are making the rounds at various meets and ginning up the press. They expect to be found out, so they do their utmost to be above the board on all regulations and policies, lest the biggoted officials sideline the potential of these three very talented runners. I know more about track, how it works, a runner’s body, and the logistics of running an athletics program than I ever wanted to know. This really disengaged me and kept me from really being attached to the novel. I can’t really tell you all the exciting things that happen because they weren’t that exciting to me. I’m sure a runner reading this would say differently. The author tries to make the races stand out moments, but I found my eyes quickly passing over them. They go to Europe and on a few other excursions. That’s about it.

The novel begins to pick up when (surprise, surprise) Billy confesses his love for Harlan. There’s not much build up to it. It just happens and after a few pages their lovers. Billy’s talent has the potential to lead him all the way to the Olympics, but they must overcome discrimination and bigotry in order to do so. I found their relationship to be rushed, the rocky parts to be...well, not that rocky, and their ideas of a relationship to be somewhat conventional. Almost immediately, for Harlan, at least, it’s marriage or nothing. That’s a pretty interesting concept for the 1970s, but also a very conventional one by today’s standards. A little jealousy ensues, especially in regards to Billy’s friend Vince who would have been a really good plot point had he been used. He’s the rebellious, sexy character that could have given the novel a little more pizzazz, but instead he largely enters and exits quickly.

Billy shows his talent in spite of the hardlined track officials and begins getting publicity. Soon everyone knows about Harlan and Billy. They appear in the media and are sidelined every chance the track officials can get. The novel becomes Harlan and Billy hurtling over roadblocks for a bit in order to make it to the Montreal Olympics. By this point, both Harlan and Billy have settled into a rhythm of domesticity. Billy, Vince, and Jacques have graduated and are now faculty working in a newly developed gay studies program. When they’re not teaching, they’re competing in track meets. Slowly, both Vince and Jacques (who are lovers, but it’s not that interesting) leave racing.

Billy finds himself competing in the Montreal Olympics against all odds after getting “married” to Harlan. He gets a gold medal in the 10,000 and is attempting to get a gold medal in the 5,000 before being gunned down. The novel then takes a bizarre turn by Harlan using Billy’s frozen sperm to inseminate his best female friend in order to produce Billy’s baby. They had talked about having kids and finding a “fox” to have it (code for girl, I guess). Harlan inexplicably falls for Vince and the story ends there.

The writing isn’t particularly spectacular, but serviceable. The more graphic scenes are okay...I guess. I didn’t get giddy for the relationship to develop. I wasn’t feverishly turning the page to see how things evolve. In a few pages the relationship just “was”, and that was that. Not a whole lot of testing or ups/downs. The plot and its main source of inspiration were not inspirational to me. There were definitely some parts that have not aged well. Particularly, Harlan’s toxic masculinity, his views on trasgender people, and a few phrases here and there regarding feminism and racism. There is an extremely bizarre part where a friend keeps a gang-raped 16 year old who he rescues on heroin to dull the pain of his previous life. I still can’t wrap my head around that part.

The ending was the hardest part for me to accept. I mean, there is a lot to unpack there, but the author chooses not to go too far into, what for me, is a vastly more interesting area. Instead, she sticks to the logistics of track and the political and bigotted nature of the organizing bodies. I mean, he literally takes his dead “husband's” sperm, impregnates his bestie, and then they live together raising that child. Then, out of absolutely nowhere, the novel (which hasn’t hinted at any romantic interest whatsoever) suggests that Harlan and Vince have always loved each other. It’s like Harlan is trying to replace Billy any way he can. Through a baby and through his friend, Vince. It’s weird. Lot’s to unpack there, but alas, it doesn’t go that far.

I see the novel’s merits. Maybe if it had been on a subject that I’m interested in I would have cared more. However, the relationships are melodramatic and flatlined. I was more interested in Billy’s perspective, but we’re in Harlan’s head which isn’t a very interesting place to be. There’s more track in his book than there is gay romance. Like I said, serviceable. There’s a sequel, but I’m hesitant to revisit.

edgarito's review

Go to review page

challenging emotional hopeful sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

dianametzger's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Read it for my book club. Quite dated, which is to be expected. The astrological sign references are tedious and more interesting characters' stories don't play out. Some of the erotic writing was overdone and laughable...this all being said, I devoured this book quickly. It's melodramatic and a fun read.

scottlovestoread's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Love, love, love!

ridhimacha's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I really enjoyed this book. Coming after the Stonewall Riot, it talks a lot about injustice and the way the straight world reacts to the gay world in the context of running. I felt seen and there were lots of moments that was mentioned about gay love that I felt were especially special. A bittersweet ending but understandable. Overall, a very easy and fast read that keeps you engaged.

moogen's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

This book hasn't aged very well and it's actually not very well written. But in its time it would have been ground breaking. 2 stars for the courage to write it.

kristianalace's review

Go to review page

medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.75

Interesanti, ka grāmata, kura  tiek uzskatīta par vienu no svarīgākajiem 20. gadsimta romāniem 21. gadsimtā tiek ignorēta.   Par to nerunā ne mūsdienās tik daudzie un dažadie kvīru mediji, ne tā saucamie “pareizie”, kas jau sen solījās no romāna motīviem izveidot filmu,taču nekad to nepaveica. 
Kaut arī  brīžiem grāmata un tās varoņi likās parlieku seksuāli, tomēr nevar aizmirst, ka gan tajā laikā, gan  mūsdienās liela daļa no daiļliteratūras,kuras centrā ir homoseksuāļi, tiek seksualizēta, jo daudzi vēljoprājām uz šāda veida attiecībām skatās caur fetiša brillēm.
      Patrīcijas Nellas Vorenas  darbs nav labākais vai pat viens no labākajiem, taču tas ir  viens no svarīgākajiem, jo tas deva iespēju citiem rakstīt vēl labākus , patiesākus romānus, kas šāda veida mīlestību parāda, kā ne tikai skaistu, bet arī pilnīgi normālu.

joe2d2's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

once groundbreaking, pedestrian melodrama that has not aged well.