Reviews

The Course of the Heart by M. John Harrison

dllman05's review

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

hahildebrand's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Eerie and remarkable.

joannaautumn's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

The Course of the Heart - A Wonder of Strange Fiction

The Course of the Heart by John M. Harrison was unlike anything I have come across in fiction, in the sea of almost 1300 books this is a magnificent stand-alone.

The story revolves around three main characters who participated in a nondescript ritual during their college days and its consequences on their adult lives. Harrison pays little attention to the ritual itself, which is out of character for fiction writing that involves such a trope if you are hoping to find a new dark academic book like Tartt’s The Secret History and Rio’s If We Were Liars you will be disappointed. This book is devoid of academic pretense, privileged young intellectuals, and dark topics to which we are accustomed in the genre.

The deconstruction of Holy Grail stories, gnosticism, along with the history of medieval Europe go hand in hand with the exploration of human morality and the loss of the heart. The real question here is where is the heart now, and what is the heart? What is Pleroma? Is it worth the risk to even know the answer to such questions? The case of the characters of the novel provides a negative answer – all of them are haunted by literal demons that have come out of Pleroma. Pam is followed by a white entity resembling a floating couple entangled in eternal lovemaking with wide eyes staring at the observer, Lucas is followed by a wayward dwarvish creature, and the narrator is haunted by the vivid smell of roses, the smell of the Goddess of Pleroma.

Much of the joy of reading this book is in the participation in the Search for the lost heart. Lucas has made a story out of their unfortunate past in order to give sense to the pain they are facing in the present. Lucas and Pam believe in the story: „But he had begun to believe that the historical past of the Coeur was only a kind of involution of his own life, a way of twisting or folding the outside of his experience to imply an inside, a meaning.”

Harrison is bold enough to present us with an almost forgotten viewpoint on faith, humanity, morality, and life. Maybe our views often coming from a place of self-centeredness are limited, at times comical. Our tries to make sense of topics out of the scope of our understanding may only lead to madness. Wrapped up in masterful symbiosis of the poetic beauty of the language with the plain structure of the plot and complex topics discussed, Harrison has made one unique piece of fiction, one that evokes both pleasure and contemplation urging the reader to return to the novel and explore the mystery of Kenoma and Pleroma over again.

„I don’t think it was “wrong” or “evil”. Why should it have been? I think now it was one of those things that life offers you, from which you take the value you expect, or have been encouraged to expect, rather than some intrinsic goodness or badness.“

colinyjchung's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.75

a_monkey's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Don’t get it, really, but well written.

hermestri's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

avalon111's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Some wonderful writing in this. Well, pages and pages of it.

Disturbing sometimes, but never confusing or incoherent. I'd say it's like nothing I've read before, but the reality is most Mike Harrison books are like this.

There's one particular element I love about 'Course; it travels about a bit. That is, quite a few locations are featured, and strangely-enough, I know quite a few of them. Such as Huddersfield, which I visit twice-a-year. Manchester, Carnforth (at the edge of Cumbria) London...When the reader actually knows the locations a writer employs, it does create a special connection with a book.

peapod_boston's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Any book with a character who says, "China's in the heart, Jack" starts out ahead of the game. Another beautiful and disturbing outing from Harrison.

kittenscribble's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

As someone who greatly enjoys both classic literature and speculative fiction, I was greatly disappointed by "The Course of the Heart," which promised to meld the two. The writing is overwrought and frequently incoherent. The reader is given no motivation whatsoever to continue reading the book; the characters are interchangeable madmen, unsympathetic and bereft of will. Their background is withheld throughout in a fashion that would be maddening, if the reader could be brought to care. No foundation is laid, no tension is built, and no conclusion is reached when the characters finally drift offstage at the end.

I have not read anything else by M. John Harrison, who seems to be a well-respected author; for all I know, he could have more than earned his acclaim with other works. I would not recommend this one.

jessriguez's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0