Reviews

The Waste Land And Other Poems by T.S. Eliot

Only show reviews with written explanations

wileyjuly's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

the whole “and other poems” part was like way better lol

nickleby_shepherd's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Pretty sure this 2Star rating is more of a reflection on me than on T.S. Eliot. Maybe I read these poems too quickly and thusly didn’t savor them properly. The majority of the poems did not grab me, especially Waste Land. Again, it’s a me problem honestly. One of days I’ll return to these poems and sit down and actually take my time with them.

ngordon22293's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

The Love Song of J Alfred Prufrock was one of the best poems I've ever read, and Hollow Men resonated as well. The Waste Land was good, if a bit esoteric, and then no other poem in the book really did it for me. Also - there are entire poems in French so... missed out on those.

profbeards's review

Go to review page

4.0

Decided to re-visit some Eliot for the Literature GRE studying.

klptenn's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I am not a big poetry fan. It was well written, but not my favorite.

rebelbelle13's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I didn't read much poetry in my youth- but the ones I did either spoke of nature (Robert Frost) or were for children (Robert Louis Stevenson, Shel Silverstein). Somehow, I managed to get through college without reading renowned TS Eliot. I am here now, to remedy that oversight. I have mixed feelings about this collection. Certain poems really spoke to me, and brought me into turn-of-the-century America and England. His observations of city life were vivid, dirty, and real. This is where he's at his best. Morning at the Window- although one of his shortest in the collection, was my favorite. I can almost see the city waking, the housemaids already on the streets, the fog covering everything. Just beautiful imagery. The same goes for Preludes parts 1-4. He speaks of dirty, sawdust-filled streets. Of chimneys, of cab-horses. Some of it rhymes, some of it doesn't, and that's okay here- we're catching a glimpse of 1915 city life.
However, there are many things I didn't care for. Some of his poems are just a jumble of nonsense. I read some in-depth reviews to be sure I wasn't missing anything. He's attempting to intelligently comment on certain parts of society- but bounces around so much and twists his verbiage in such a fashion that the meaning gets lost. I didn't care for his major work, The Waste Land, which illustrates my previous complaint. Yes, the man was smart. Yes, he was trying to show that. No, it doesn't help that three of his poems were completely in French. I might be interested in more of his poetry, if he stuck to what he was good at.