challenging informative

The description of capitalist realism and the analysis of capitalism was really well-done. However, it fell short for me because some of the other elements he tried to incorperate were not done with the same analysis or rigor. There was a bit on technology as well as some critique/analysis of various parts of leftism that just did not have enough backing in the text or depth of analysis. In order to bring in those elements, I think the book needed to be at least twice as long (and some of the assertions, I'm not sure would stand up -- or certainly would have more nuance -- if more analysis was done). I think the main focus was really great and absolutely worth reading -- the concept of capitalist realism and a lot of the points he makes about it are spot on and very important. However, I think he tried to do too much with other elements for such a short work.
challenging hopeful informative reflective

reread after reading more philsophy
challenging dark informative slow-paced
challenging dark hopeful informative inspiring medium-paced
challenging informative medium-paced
slow-paced

I’m really sad l.this could’ve been such an interesting read, but the unnecessary academic jargon is way beyond my reading level it gave me a headache 

not sure anyone captures the zeitgeist better than you did, Mark.

Rest in power.
challenging hopeful informative reflective medium-paced
challenging informative fast-paced
challenging inspiring reflective medium-paced