Reviews

Cranford by Elizabeth Gaskell

thenovelbook's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

It's been many a year since I've read Cranford, and it's even better than I remembered. Such hilarious episodes and adorable characters, although also mixed with more tragedy than I remembered.

#Victober2021

cattytrona's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

i think this is nice, sweet, kind, an easy, pleasant read. but i struggled a lot to want to pick it up. i crawled through it in 15 page increments right before i went to sleep. so even though, if asked, i would say 'yeah, it was good :)', i fear that pace is a pretty damning and more truthful review.

trin's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

This is all Philip Glenister’s fault. I watched the miniseries because he was in it, and the miniseries reminded me that I’ve been meaning to read more Gaskell ever since I read [b: North and South|156538|North and South|Elizabeth Gaskell|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1349633381l/156538._SY75_.jpg|1016482] while at Trinity. Then it turned out that Glenister’s character isn’t even in this volume, the first in a loose series about the fictional town of Cranford. “Loose” is a good word to describe the book as a whole: it was written in installments (Gaskell was a friend of [a: Charles Dickens|239579|Charles Dickens|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1387078070p2/239579.jpg] and wrote for various publications he edited), and despite some narrative through-threads, it remains mostly a series of vignettes. It’s very funny, though, in that wry, satirical, Victorian way. At the same time, it’s quite sad: full of lost chances at love, which seem especially awful in an era when there were so few opportunities for women outside of marriage. Now, a large part of what Gaskell seems to be arguing is that the women of Cranford do just fine for themselves without any men, and it is indeed the friendship between them that comes to the rescue when one of them encounters trouble. (Well, that and a father swooping in to help and a brother coming home—it’s almost her message, okay?) It just seems, I don’t know, like such a small, lonely life. My modern sensibilities, can I show you them?

ANYWAY, I quite enjoyed reading this, though not as much as North and South, which benefits from social strife, culture clash, and a romance—a real plot, in other words. I may try [b: Cousin Phillis|47655388|Cousin Phillis|Elizabeth Cleghorn Gaskell|https://s.gr-assets.com/assets/nophoto/book/50x75-a91bf249278a81aabab721ef782c4a74.png|72800060] (one of the other Cranford novels) or [b: Mary Barton|54620|Mary Barton|Elizabeth Gaskell|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1298427440l/54620._SX50_.jpg|2887963] next. Anyone familiar with Gaskell have any thoughts?

alyssasshelves's review against another edition

Go to review page

lighthearted slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

susannadkm's review against another edition

Go to review page

Did not get into any of the stories. I was hoping it'd be more like North and South.

sidharthvardhan's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

By far, my favorite Gaskell.

rushda's review against another edition

Go to review page

lighthearted medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

teii's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny lighthearted relaxing slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

phoenix2's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

A good and easy book to read.