You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Take a photo of a barcode or cover
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
I really was stunned when I read the author’s note and saw this took over seven years to write. When you see that in comparison to the quality of the work, you really start to wonder why and how some authors get book deals. Maybe it’s because this author is self-conflated to be another Sally Rooney type of author, which for me doesn’t gain her any brownie points because frankly I don’t care much for Rooney. Maybe it’s because this work is an outlandish self insert (the main female character has long silky blonde hair, is British, and is a manic artist dream girl? Please spare me). Maybe it’s because it’s trendy to have contemporary literature that parrots pseudo feminism and “complex” relationships as a way of justifying being selfish, cruel, immature, emotional toxic, and draining people to others in your life.
I really struggled with a lot of things in this book, first being the writing quality. I read “Blue Sisters” first before this and I’m glad because had I read this first, I would have never picked up Mellors’ second novel. There are so many hideous little metaphors in this book like “you sound like how biting into an apple sounds,” or “[it] felt like a punch to the vagina.” Dear god, spare me. Also there are syntax and grammatical typos in the copy I read that I am surprised were not picked up sooner by the copy editors for this work.
Secondly, I struggled with the content of the work when it came to characterization. The last conversation between the two protagonists is the only shred of self reflection we get as to why these two incredibly emotionally immature individuals behave the way they do. The reason why? It’s because (surprise, surprise!) they didn’t have a loving father and mother or a stable home environment so they’re always looking to perform for love. This is such a problematic and shallow explanation for people’s behavior that it just really showcases to me the depth of the maturity of the author herself.
Thirdly, and perhaps the most grave issue with this book is the way it treats race, sexuality, and gender. The plot synopsis is extremely misleading, claiming we are going to get a discussion of topics such as gender dysphoria. Instead, that topic is mentioned once and relegated to the back, to be left behind while the trope of drug addiction and internalized misogyny are brought forward. It’s weak and uneducated writing, not to mention an absolutely weak marketing strategy to try and get people to be interested in this book. Additionally, there are extremely tiring racist tropes in this book and microaggressions that just painfully demonstrate to everyone but the author how blindingly white and privileged and sheltered and willfully uneducated she is on these topics. For a book that took over seven years to craft, she somehow forgot to include any social nuance or vantage point beyond her comfortable rich white lifestyle in New York or London.
It’s truly surprising to me sometimes the type of literature that people will call “good,” especially when we’re talking about works like this. Maybe it’s a sign of my age and different interests, but I don’t want to read about two pretentious, selfish, and emotionally immature individuals who desperately need therapy. The writing tropes are overworked and quite frankly lame, the characterization is a joke, and the excessive focus on drug use is just wearisome (and the fact that it’s featured so heavily in “blue sisters” means it’s more of this author’s penchant in her writing). This was very much a massive miss for me and another well deserved lesson on how I am very much not the target audience for this melodramatic and slipshod literature that glorifies emotionally immaturity and self destructive behaviors.
I really struggled with a lot of things in this book, first being the writing quality. I read “Blue Sisters” first before this and I’m glad because had I read this first, I would have never picked up Mellors’ second novel. There are so many hideous little metaphors in this book like “you sound like how biting into an apple sounds,” or “[it] felt like a punch to the vagina.” Dear god, spare me. Also there are syntax and grammatical typos in the copy I read that I am surprised were not picked up sooner by the copy editors for this work.
Secondly, I struggled with the content of the work when it came to characterization. The last conversation between the two protagonists is the only shred of self reflection we get as to why these two incredibly emotionally immature individuals behave the way they do. The reason why? It’s because (surprise, surprise!) they didn’t have a loving father and mother or a stable home environment so they’re always looking to perform for love. This is such a problematic and shallow explanation for people’s behavior that it just really showcases to me the depth of the maturity of the author herself.
Thirdly, and perhaps the most grave issue with this book is the way it treats race, sexuality, and gender. The plot synopsis is extremely misleading, claiming we are going to get a discussion of topics such as gender dysphoria. Instead, that topic is mentioned once and relegated to the back, to be left behind while the trope of drug addiction and internalized misogyny are brought forward. It’s weak and uneducated writing, not to mention an absolutely weak marketing strategy to try and get people to be interested in this book. Additionally, there are extremely tiring racist tropes in this book and microaggressions that just painfully demonstrate to everyone but the author how blindingly white and privileged and sheltered and willfully uneducated she is on these topics. For a book that took over seven years to craft, she somehow forgot to include any social nuance or vantage point beyond her comfortable rich white lifestyle in New York or London.
It’s truly surprising to me sometimes the type of literature that people will call “good,” especially when we’re talking about works like this. Maybe it’s a sign of my age and different interests, but I don’t want to read about two pretentious, selfish, and emotionally immature individuals who desperately need therapy. The writing tropes are overworked and quite frankly lame, the characterization is a joke, and the excessive focus on drug use is just wearisome (and the fact that it’s featured so heavily in “blue sisters” means it’s more of this author’s penchant in her writing). This was very much a massive miss for me and another well deserved lesson on how I am very much not the target audience for this melodramatic and slipshod literature that glorifies emotionally immaturity and self destructive behaviors.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Adult/minor relationship, Alcoholism, Cursing, Death, Drug abuse, Drug use, Emotional abuse, Infidelity, Mental illness, Misogyny, Self harm, Sexual content, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide, Toxic relationship, Xenophobia, Blood, Vomit, Medical content, Grief, Suicide attempt, Death of parent, Gaslighting, Toxic friendship, Alcohol, Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Addiction, Animal cruelty, Animal death, Body shaming, Eating disorder, Fatphobia, Sexual content, Transphobia, Abandonment, Classism
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
funny
hopeful
inspiring
lighthearted
mysterious
reflective
relaxing
sad
tense
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
There’s racist tropes of angry POC, a LOT of fatphobia, and a wildy misogynistic fantasy rape and murder scene- literally none of this was necessary at all.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Addiction, Alcoholism, Animal cruelty, Animal death, Body horror, Body shaming, Bullying, Cancer, Child abuse, Child death, Chronic illness, Confinement, Cursing, Death, Domestic abuse, Drug abuse, Drug use, Eating disorder, Emotional abuse, Fatphobia, Gore, Hate crime, Homophobia, Infertility, Infidelity, Mental illness, Misogyny, Panic attacks/disorders, Physical abuse, Racism, Rape, Self harm, Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide, Terminal illness, Toxic relationship, Transphobia, Violence, Forced institutionalization, Xenophobia, Blood, Vomit, Medical content, Trafficking, Grief, Medical trauma, Stalking, Suicide attempt, Death of parent, Acephobia/Arophobia, Murder, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Cultural appropriation, Gaslighting, Toxic friendship, Abandonment, Alcohol, Sexual harassment, Colonisation, Dysphoria, Injury/Injury detail, Classism, Deportation
I don't care what will happen with the characters anymore. 😑
Content Warnings
Graphic: Addiction, Alcoholism, Body shaming, Cursing, Drug abuse, Drug use, Eating disorder, Fatphobia, Homophobia, Infidelity, Misogyny, Panic attacks/disorders, Sexism, Suicidal thoughts, Toxic relationship, Xenophobia, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Gaslighting, Toxic friendship, Alcohol, Sexual harassment
dark
emotional
funny
sad
tense
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
Content Warnings
Graphic: Alcoholism, Drug abuse, Drug use, Mental illness, Sexism, Sexual content, Toxic friendship
Moderate: Sexual assault, Sexual violence, Violence
Minor: Animal death, Xenophobia
dark
emotional
hopeful
reflective
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
I enjoyed this book, but I definitely wish I’d known about several big trigger warnings that were complete shocks to me (including multiple graphic animal deaths and transphobia that results in violence—I had no clue that this book involved animals OR queer people before reading). These missing warnings didn’t negatively impact my reading of the book, but they feel symptomatic of what is maybe a larger issue I had with the book: there were a lot of scenes that felt maybe gratuitously violent/detailed in a way that was almost unnecessary for the actual plot.
Cleopatra and Frankenstein is pretty much what it says on the tin (and the plot summary): a book about a couple with a large age gap who are both deeply flawed individuals, and the ways their relationship affects the people in their lives as well as how their lives are affected in turn. I didn’t expect this book to have shifting perspectives in each chapter and to focus so heavily on characters aside from the two titular protagonists, but I actually found myself preferring the chapters that gave us insight into the larger context of Cleo and Frank’s relationship. Although I wish I could get more context for certain characters and the changes in their lives, it almost felt true to life: sometimes the people you care about extremely deeply will have major life changes that you know almost nothing about, and you don’t get closure. This also felt like it was reflective of how self-absorbed Cleo and Frank were, in that their friends like Quentin and Zoe were going through some significant life changes and crises of their own, but by the end of the book we get little to no information on the outcomes of these events. From a realism standpoint, this was amazing… but from a reader’s standpoint, I definitely felt sad that the most of an ending I could get for my favorite characters was “They hopefully aren’t dead in a ditch.” On the other hand, during each characters’ respective chapter, we got a significant amount of insight into their personal lives with only limited references to the titular characters in a way that felt kind of unnecessary to the plot; sure, I get that pointing out the irony of an overweight culinary master who’s on a pretty strict diet is Fun Social Commentary™ and the fact that Cleo and Frank barely know about this characters’ struggle or reference it during their chapters is reflective of their self-involvement, but like… again, as a reader, part of me feels like these scenes are such unnecessary tangents to the protagonists’ actual character arcs. Most of the changes and “growth” that Cleo and Frank have and go through feel random and unearned, like the novel has to explicitly tell us that they’ve changed because we spent so much time focusing on Anders’s strained relationship with his son.
Relatedly, the dialogue in this book gets kinda silly. I listened to the audiobook so my impressions of certain scenes might be very different than those of a reader of a physical copy, but there were several bits of dialogue that had me rolling my eyes. Chapter 13 is one particularly example of this issue: somehow, the dialogue between Cleo and Frank felt simultaneously too realistic and too forced, like the author couldn’t decide if she wanted to capture what arguments were actually like (including the awkward pauses, the ways people cut each other off) or what arguments felt like (focusing on the inner turmoil of each character between the lines or the minute cues of body language to show how they feel). The characters constantly talked around their issues, which is again, true to life, but unfortunately the nothing-dialogue can lead to some pretty lackluster “big fight” scenes.
There are lots of stereotypes abound in a way that is almost maybe social commentary until you look up the author and see that she is a conventionally attractive cis blonde woman and suddenly you go, “Wow, this is a book that has a lot of transphobia during the narration from a character who is heavily implied if not outright stated to be a trans woman, and while it’s positioned in a way that feels like it’s supposed to be representative of internalized transphobia, this does maybe feel weird in the broader context of this being a book about the relationship between two flawed mostly-heterosexual cisgender people!” Likewise, LOTS of really random comments about race and ethnic stereotypes that feel like they should maybe be satire except that they’re completely unchallenged… or challenged in a way that the book immediately mocks. Maybe there’s an argument that the book as a whole is satirical, and while it does have moments where that feels clear, it often clumsily treads the fine line between making fun of stereotypes and perpetuating those same stereotypes.
Despite everything, though, I was totally wrapped up in this book. I binged the whole audiobook during a knitting-induced frenzy (which resulted in an all-nighter) and still felt so awed by how beautiful certain parts of the prose sounded, especially during Santiago and Eleanor’s chapters, and the philosophical ideas explored during Zoe’s chapters. I became emotionally invested in these somewhat stereotypical characters for an evening, and I truly do feel like there are moments and scenes from this book that will stay with me even now that I’ve finished it.
Overall, this was a pretty standard entry in the subcategory of litfic about beautiful yet waifish blondes who do a lot of drugs in New York and feel miserable about the older men and so-called friends with which they surround themselves. Somehow, the hype is completely understandable and yet overdone in a way that’s to be expected for this type of novel. (There’s always hype around books about sad beautiful women with addictions living in big cities, even if those books are mostly the same.) Despite my many criticisms and the fact that this book isn’t particularly unique in its plot or commentary, I still mostly enjoyed this and would (VERY VERY tentatively and with many caveats and warnings) recommend this to others, if only to discuss some of the things I might take issue with in the book.
Cleopatra and Frankenstein is pretty much what it says on the tin (and the plot summary): a book about a couple with a large age gap who are both deeply flawed individuals, and the ways their relationship affects the people in their lives as well as how their lives are affected in turn. I didn’t expect this book to have shifting perspectives in each chapter and to focus so heavily on characters aside from the two titular protagonists, but I actually found myself preferring the chapters that gave us insight into the larger context of Cleo and Frank’s relationship. Although I wish I could get more context for certain characters and the changes in their lives, it almost felt true to life: sometimes the people you care about extremely deeply will have major life changes that you know almost nothing about, and you don’t get closure. This also felt like it was reflective of how self-absorbed Cleo and Frank were, in that their friends like Quentin and Zoe were going through some significant life changes and crises of their own, but by the end of the book we get little to no information on the outcomes of these events. From a realism standpoint, this was amazing… but from a reader’s standpoint, I definitely felt sad that the most of an ending I could get for my favorite characters was “They hopefully aren’t dead in a ditch.” On the other hand, during each characters’ respective chapter, we got a significant amount of insight into their personal lives with only limited references to the titular characters in a way that felt kind of unnecessary to the plot; sure, I get that pointing out the irony of an overweight culinary master who’s on a pretty strict diet is Fun Social Commentary™ and the fact that Cleo and Frank barely know about this characters’ struggle or reference it during their chapters is reflective of their self-involvement, but like… again, as a reader, part of me feels like these scenes are such unnecessary tangents to the protagonists’ actual character arcs. Most of the changes and “growth” that Cleo and Frank have and go through feel random and unearned, like the novel has to explicitly tell us that they’ve changed because we spent so much time focusing on Anders’s strained relationship with his son.
Relatedly, the dialogue in this book gets kinda silly. I listened to the audiobook so my impressions of certain scenes might be very different than those of a reader of a physical copy, but there were several bits of dialogue that had me rolling my eyes. Chapter 13 is one particularly example of this issue: somehow, the dialogue between Cleo and Frank felt simultaneously too realistic and too forced, like the author couldn’t decide if she wanted to capture what arguments were actually like (including the awkward pauses, the ways people cut each other off) or what arguments felt like (focusing on the inner turmoil of each character between the lines or the minute cues of body language to show how they feel). The characters constantly talked around their issues, which is again, true to life, but unfortunately the nothing-dialogue can lead to some pretty lackluster “big fight” scenes.
There are lots of stereotypes abound in a way that is almost maybe social commentary until you look up the author and see that she is a conventionally attractive cis blonde woman and suddenly you go, “Wow, this is a book that has a lot of transphobia during the narration from a character who is heavily implied if not outright stated to be a trans woman, and while it’s positioned in a way that feels like it’s supposed to be representative of internalized transphobia, this does maybe feel weird in the broader context of this being a book about the relationship between two flawed mostly-heterosexual cisgender people!” Likewise, LOTS of really random comments about race and ethnic stereotypes that feel like they should maybe be satire except that they’re completely unchallenged… or challenged in a way that the book immediately mocks. Maybe there’s an argument that the book as a whole is satirical, and while it does have moments where that feels clear, it often clumsily treads the fine line between making fun of stereotypes and perpetuating those same stereotypes.
Despite everything, though, I was totally wrapped up in this book. I binged the whole audiobook during a knitting-induced frenzy (which resulted in an all-nighter) and still felt so awed by how beautiful certain parts of the prose sounded, especially during Santiago and Eleanor’s chapters, and the philosophical ideas explored during Zoe’s chapters. I became emotionally invested in these somewhat stereotypical characters for an evening, and I truly do feel like there are moments and scenes from this book that will stay with me even now that I’ve finished it.
Overall, this was a pretty standard entry in the subcategory of litfic about beautiful yet waifish blondes who do a lot of drugs in New York and feel miserable about the older men and so-called friends with which they surround themselves. Somehow, the hype is completely understandable and yet overdone in a way that’s to be expected for this type of novel. (There’s always hype around books about sad beautiful women with addictions living in big cities, even if those books are mostly the same.) Despite my many criticisms and the fact that this book isn’t particularly unique in its plot or commentary, I still mostly enjoyed this and would (VERY VERY tentatively and with many caveats and warnings) recommend this to others, if only to discuss some of the things I might take issue with in the book.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Addiction, Alcoholism, Animal death, Death, Drug abuse, Drug use, Eating disorder, Emotional abuse, Fatphobia, Gore, Hate crime, Infidelity, Mental illness, Physical abuse, Self harm, Sexism, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide, Toxic relationship, Transphobia, Violence, Xenophobia, Dementia, Grief, Suicide attempt, Death of parent, Outing, Toxic friendship, Abandonment, Alcohol, Dysphoria, Injury/Injury detail, Classism
challenging
dark
funny
sad
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
Content Warnings
Graphic: Addiction, Alcoholism, Drug abuse, Toxic relationship, Transphobia, Xenophobia, Blood, Suicide attempt, Death of parent
Moderate: Adult/minor relationship
dark
emotional
funny
reflective
tense
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
so exhausting yet so immersive. I yearn for the characters, I want to know more about them, I wish I never knew them. couldn't care less yet have never cared so much.
Content Warnings
Moderate: Self harm, Suicide attempt
Minor: Racism, Xenophobia, Sexual harassment