Reviews with content warning for Gore - The Vegetarian

Reviews tagging 'Gore'

The Vegetarian by Han Kang

107 reviews

sharnanigans's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.25

Content Warnings

preciousmist's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark sad medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

Meh. Fascinating under a feminist lense, not really impactful in any other aspect.

Slight spoilers below, and brief discussion of sexual abuse.

I think the way this book superimposes body and sexual horror with femininity and social constraints that come with a (cis) feminine body is interesting. I think it's a interesting commentary on Women within Korean society, when I cross reference the little I know of it with the story of this book.

I also think there's some problems with it. For one, the true psychological horror that comes with this book is, funnily enough, in the chapters with male POV's. The way they see women (women as objects, that is, though both male characters we get see this objectivication from different points, one as social value for others, and one as value for his own self-realization and self-worth, in a way) and the way they go unchecked is terrifying because I can see it happening. The rape scenes are brief, but bone-chillingly... normal? If that's a word one can use along with rape. They aren't explored further on the effects they have on the women characters that go through it - though one can say we see the narrative itself being affected for it.

I think what bothers me the most about this book is the emphasis on "strength" of the last, and the only woman who has a POV, character. The sheer will she possesses is what gets her through the days, that and the love for her son - that is what prevents her from succumbing to the strangeness that afflicts her sister. This strength is met with different, and mixed, conclusions at the end:

A) She recognises it was sheer will, and cowardice, that prevented her from going down the same path as her sister. Her sister recognizes this strangeness, in a way, as a strength - the strength to be different.

B) But she continues with the same pattern as before, while as well seeing her sister's "mental illness" as something undesirable. The writing almost insists this endurance is the path to go - survival, not rebellion, is the way. For as feminist this book is, and it is!, somehow I can see a reader coming from this book with the idea that women shouldn't stray too much from the socially accepted roles given to them, because;

C) All this strangeness, all this rebellion, all the suffering endured, is concluded with the afflicted character ultimately dying to the world. Now, I understand why: the Protag has rejected meat, carnality, sexuality, violence. Still, as we see in chapter two, this is imposed on her: through rape, exploration of her body, and the male gaze. Though she has emptied herself of all desire, all the sexual and deviant things inside her, she can't get rid of her *body*, which is why chapter 3 is where we see the Protag's body waste away to nothing, and why there's an insistence in the flora comparison. Trees are not sexual, or better yet, their sexuality is not violent. Is this book implying the only way for an *individual* to be liberated of all the complication that come with a sexual society, a sexual drive, a material life, per se, is to literally become an alien to her own humanity and waste away? One could say yes. In fact, the only way for this to not happen to the one other woman in this book, is for her to connect herself to the social gender roles given to her, that and motherhood.

I think this is an interesting book with a pretty clear message, but I wonder about the ways the message is delivered. I understand the complexity of the topic, which is perhaps why the end of this book can read so differently depending on the reader. Alas, this is a book I'd like to think about more, but certainly not reread.

Also, and perhaps this is a string of unfortunate experiences, but I have yet to read a (translated) korean book whose prose *worked* for me. Is it a translation problem I wonder? Something about the Korean language itself that lends to a translation that seems... Not vague, but certainly seems to leave some sentences incomplete, or weird, gramatically speaking? I can't read Korean, and I've certainly tried to learn it to no avail as I simply cannot compute the alphabet for some reason, but this is the second book I've read in general where I get that feeling.

Oh well. It lends to the strangeness of it all, I guess.

Content Warnings

reader00's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.0

Content Warnings

sk1m086's review

Go to review page

Gross and too graphic. stopped when the dog was clearly about to be tortured and killed

Content Warnings

avrilamber's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

This is a weird story and not what I expected, having not known much about the story.

I have minor issues with this story. The pacing, despite the length of the book, is pretty slow. The story is split into three parts told from the perspective of three people who all have a connection to the “protagonist”. A lot of the novel is based in the characters, and not much plot development which is probably why it felt so slow paced.

It’s a very interesting story about bodily autonomy, and the reaction of others when someone decides to not conform. I liked how each narrator had a completely different perspective on the protagonists choice to become a vegetarian - rage/disgust, lust, jealousy but almost acceptance.

Not a fan of the SA in this, far too much casual r*pe thrown in there without much warning.

If you like a weird, intense novel that isn’t too on the nose then this might be worth a go.

Content Warnings

a_wren_that_reads's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

Content Warnings

pinkiereads's review

Go to review page

challenging dark tense

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

veeeryyyyyy strange... i only really liked the last third, from the sister's perspective. everything else i kinda struggled to get through, and it didn't feel like some of the violence - both real and imagined - was necessary. and i would have loved to know more about the dreams and the wife's perspective! i'm writing this months after reading it so i dont really remember oops

Content Warnings